Cargando…

Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas

BACKGROUND: Femoral arteriovenous grafts are rarely used to provide vascular access for dialysis patients. This is likely due, in part, to historically high rates of graft loss from infection and thrombosis. However, for selected patients who have exhausted all access options in the upper extremity,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumaine, Chance, Espino-Hernandez, Gabriela, Romann, Alexandra, Luscombe, Rick, Kiaii, Mercedeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358117719747
_version_ 1784652757414707200
author Dumaine, Chance
Espino-Hernandez, Gabriela
Romann, Alexandra
Luscombe, Rick
Kiaii, Mercedeh
author_facet Dumaine, Chance
Espino-Hernandez, Gabriela
Romann, Alexandra
Luscombe, Rick
Kiaii, Mercedeh
author_sort Dumaine, Chance
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Femoral arteriovenous grafts are rarely used to provide vascular access for dialysis patients. This is likely due, in part, to historically high rates of graft loss from infection and thrombosis. However, for selected patients who have exhausted all access options in the upper extremity, femoral grafts can provide additional sites for access creation and may be preferred over central venous catheters. OBJECTIVE: We sought to demonstrate that femoral grafts can provide a reliable and safe alternative to central venous catheters for selected patients. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review in Vancouver, Canada, from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2012, was conducted. All patients with new arteriovenous access (grafts and fistulas) created during the study period were included in the study population and followed for a minimum of 2 years. Comparisons of patency (primary, secondary, and functional) and complications (infectious and noninfectious) were made between the different access types. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with femoral grafts were compared with 22 patients with arm grafts and 384 patients with fistulas. Femoral grafts had higher rates of thrombosis (46% with a thrombotic event) and a higher requirement for interventions (1.3 angioplasties and 0.12 thrombolytic procedures per patient per year). However, compared with arm grafts, femoral grafts had superior secondary and functional patency. No difference in patency was seen when comparing femoral grafts with upper extremity fistulas. Only 2 patients with femoral grafts required antibiotics for infection, and no grafts were lost to infection. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with limited access options remaining, femoral grafts may provide an additional form of vascular access before resorting to catheter use. Our study shows that with appropriate patient selection, femoral grafts have low infection rates and patency that is comparable with other access types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8851105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88511052022-02-18 Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas Dumaine, Chance Espino-Hernandez, Gabriela Romann, Alexandra Luscombe, Rick Kiaii, Mercedeh Can J Kidney Health Dis Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Femoral arteriovenous grafts are rarely used to provide vascular access for dialysis patients. This is likely due, in part, to historically high rates of graft loss from infection and thrombosis. However, for selected patients who have exhausted all access options in the upper extremity, femoral grafts can provide additional sites for access creation and may be preferred over central venous catheters. OBJECTIVE: We sought to demonstrate that femoral grafts can provide a reliable and safe alternative to central venous catheters for selected patients. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review in Vancouver, Canada, from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2012, was conducted. All patients with new arteriovenous access (grafts and fistulas) created during the study period were included in the study population and followed for a minimum of 2 years. Comparisons of patency (primary, secondary, and functional) and complications (infectious and noninfectious) were made between the different access types. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with femoral grafts were compared with 22 patients with arm grafts and 384 patients with fistulas. Femoral grafts had higher rates of thrombosis (46% with a thrombotic event) and a higher requirement for interventions (1.3 angioplasties and 0.12 thrombolytic procedures per patient per year). However, compared with arm grafts, femoral grafts had superior secondary and functional patency. No difference in patency was seen when comparing femoral grafts with upper extremity fistulas. Only 2 patients with femoral grafts required antibiotics for infection, and no grafts were lost to infection. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with limited access options remaining, femoral grafts may provide an additional form of vascular access before resorting to catheter use. Our study shows that with appropriate patient selection, femoral grafts have low infection rates and patency that is comparable with other access types. SAGE Publications 2017-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8851105/ /pubmed/35186301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358117719747 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Dumaine, Chance
Espino-Hernandez, Gabriela
Romann, Alexandra
Luscombe, Rick
Kiaii, Mercedeh
Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas
title Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas
title_full Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas
title_fullStr Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas
title_full_unstemmed Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas
title_short Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas
title_sort femoral arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis: retrospective comparison with upper extremity grafts and fistulas
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358117719747
work_keys_str_mv AT dumainechance femoralarteriovenousgraftsforhemodialysisretrospectivecomparisonwithupperextremitygraftsandfistulas
AT espinohernandezgabriela femoralarteriovenousgraftsforhemodialysisretrospectivecomparisonwithupperextremitygraftsandfistulas
AT romannalexandra femoralarteriovenousgraftsforhemodialysisretrospectivecomparisonwithupperextremitygraftsandfistulas
AT luscomberick femoralarteriovenousgraftsforhemodialysisretrospectivecomparisonwithupperextremitygraftsandfistulas
AT kiaiimercedeh femoralarteriovenousgraftsforhemodialysisretrospectivecomparisonwithupperextremitygraftsandfistulas