Cargando…

Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis

BACKGROUND: Web-based mental health interventions offer a novel, accessible, and self-paced approach to care delivery to family carers (ie, relatives and close friends who support a loved one with psychosis). We coproduced COPe-support (Carers fOr People with Psychosis e-support), a psychoeducationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batchelor, Rachel, Gulshan, Sarah, Shritharan, Halpana, Williams, Elen, Henderson, Claire, Gillard, Steve, Woodham, Luke A, Cornelius, Victoria, Elkes, Jack, Sin, Jacqueline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107439
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27781
_version_ 1784652801920466944
author Batchelor, Rachel
Gulshan, Sarah
Shritharan, Halpana
Williams, Elen
Henderson, Claire
Gillard, Steve
Woodham, Luke A
Cornelius, Victoria
Elkes, Jack
Sin, Jacqueline
author_facet Batchelor, Rachel
Gulshan, Sarah
Shritharan, Halpana
Williams, Elen
Henderson, Claire
Gillard, Steve
Woodham, Luke A
Cornelius, Victoria
Elkes, Jack
Sin, Jacqueline
author_sort Batchelor, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Web-based mental health interventions offer a novel, accessible, and self-paced approach to care delivery to family carers (ie, relatives and close friends who support a loved one with psychosis). We coproduced COPe-support (Carers fOr People with Psychosis e-support), a psychoeducational intervention delivered via an enriched web-based learning environment with network support from professionals and peers. In addition to the rigorous investigation of the effectiveness of COPe-support on the well-being of carers and mental health outcomes, it is imperative to understand the experiences of using the web-based intervention by carers and its associated web-based implementation and facilitation strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the experiences of carers and perceived acceptability of COPe-support and its different components, how carers found engagement with COPe-support affected their own well-being and caregiving, and the ideas of carers for improving COPe-support and its delivery to inform any future wider implementation. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study, individually interviewing 35 carers, following their use of COPe-support for 8 months through a web-based, randomized controlled trial across England. A semistructured guide with open-ended questions was used to explore the experiences of carers and perceived acceptability of the intervention and their ideas to improve the provision. All interviews were conducted remotely through mobile phones or internet communication media, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used a thematic analysis framework to analyze the data. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified: remote, flexible, and personalized support; impacts on well-being and outlook on caregiving; and future implementation and integration with existing services. Overall, carers found COPe-support a flexible source of knowledge and support from professionals and peers that they could personalize to suit their own needs and convenience. Participants described gaining self-confidence, hope, and a sense of connectivity with others in a similar situation, which helped ameliorate isolation and perceived stigma. Most importantly, COPe-support promoted self-care among the carers themselves. Participants’ experiences, use, and activity on COPe-support varied greatly and differed among carers of various ages and levels of computer literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all participants had a positive experience with COPe-support and supported its wider implementation as a beneficial adjunctive support resource for carers in the future. Any future scale-up of such an intervention needs to consider feedback from carers and suggestions for further improvement. These included having more graphics and audiovisual content materials, improving the navigation, and building in more interactional and customization options to suit various user styles, such as emoji reactions, live web-based chat, opting in and out of updates, and choosing the frequency of reminders. To ensure successful implementation, we should also consider factors pertinent to reaching more carers and integrating the web-based resources with other conventional services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 89563420; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89563420 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12888-020-02528-w
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8851336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88513362022-03-10 Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis Batchelor, Rachel Gulshan, Sarah Shritharan, Halpana Williams, Elen Henderson, Claire Gillard, Steve Woodham, Luke A Cornelius, Victoria Elkes, Jack Sin, Jacqueline J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Web-based mental health interventions offer a novel, accessible, and self-paced approach to care delivery to family carers (ie, relatives and close friends who support a loved one with psychosis). We coproduced COPe-support (Carers fOr People with Psychosis e-support), a psychoeducational intervention delivered via an enriched web-based learning environment with network support from professionals and peers. In addition to the rigorous investigation of the effectiveness of COPe-support on the well-being of carers and mental health outcomes, it is imperative to understand the experiences of using the web-based intervention by carers and its associated web-based implementation and facilitation strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the experiences of carers and perceived acceptability of COPe-support and its different components, how carers found engagement with COPe-support affected their own well-being and caregiving, and the ideas of carers for improving COPe-support and its delivery to inform any future wider implementation. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study, individually interviewing 35 carers, following their use of COPe-support for 8 months through a web-based, randomized controlled trial across England. A semistructured guide with open-ended questions was used to explore the experiences of carers and perceived acceptability of the intervention and their ideas to improve the provision. All interviews were conducted remotely through mobile phones or internet communication media, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used a thematic analysis framework to analyze the data. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified: remote, flexible, and personalized support; impacts on well-being and outlook on caregiving; and future implementation and integration with existing services. Overall, carers found COPe-support a flexible source of knowledge and support from professionals and peers that they could personalize to suit their own needs and convenience. Participants described gaining self-confidence, hope, and a sense of connectivity with others in a similar situation, which helped ameliorate isolation and perceived stigma. Most importantly, COPe-support promoted self-care among the carers themselves. Participants’ experiences, use, and activity on COPe-support varied greatly and differed among carers of various ages and levels of computer literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all participants had a positive experience with COPe-support and supported its wider implementation as a beneficial adjunctive support resource for carers in the future. Any future scale-up of such an intervention needs to consider feedback from carers and suggestions for further improvement. These included having more graphics and audiovisual content materials, improving the navigation, and building in more interactional and customization options to suit various user styles, such as emoji reactions, live web-based chat, opting in and out of updates, and choosing the frequency of reminders. To ensure successful implementation, we should also consider factors pertinent to reaching more carers and integrating the web-based resources with other conventional services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 89563420; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89563420 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12888-020-02528-w JMIR Publications 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8851336/ /pubmed/35107439 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27781 Text en ©Rachel Batchelor, Sarah Gulshan, Halpana Shritharan, Elen Williams, Claire Henderson, Steve Gillard, Luke A Woodham, Victoria Cornelius, Jack Elkes, Jacqueline Sin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 02.02.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Batchelor, Rachel
Gulshan, Sarah
Shritharan, Halpana
Williams, Elen
Henderson, Claire
Gillard, Steve
Woodham, Luke A
Cornelius, Victoria
Elkes, Jack
Sin, Jacqueline
Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis
title Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis
title_full Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis
title_fullStr Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis
title_full_unstemmed Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis
title_short Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis
title_sort perceived acceptability and experiences of a digital psychoeducation and peer support intervention (cope-support): interview study with carers supporting individuals with psychosis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107439
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27781
work_keys_str_mv AT batchelorrachel perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT gulshansarah perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT shritharanhalpana perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT williamselen perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT hendersonclaire perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT gillardsteve perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT woodhamlukea perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT corneliusvictoria perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT elkesjack perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis
AT sinjacqueline perceivedacceptabilityandexperiencesofadigitalpsychoeducationandpeersupportinterventioncopesupportinterviewstudywithcarerssupportingindividualswithpsychosis