Cargando…
Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review
BACKGROUND: Hearing loss affects 1 in 5 people worldwide and is estimated to affect 1 in 4 by 2050. Treatment relies on the accurate diagnosis of hearing loss; however, this first step is out of reach for >80% of those affected. Increasingly automated approaches are being developed for self-admin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919056 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32581 |
_version_ | 1784652804140302336 |
---|---|
author | Wasmann, Jan-Willem Pragt, Leontien Eikelboom, Robert Swanepoel, De Wet |
author_facet | Wasmann, Jan-Willem Pragt, Leontien Eikelboom, Robert Swanepoel, De Wet |
author_sort | Wasmann, Jan-Willem |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hearing loss affects 1 in 5 people worldwide and is estimated to affect 1 in 4 by 2050. Treatment relies on the accurate diagnosis of hearing loss; however, this first step is out of reach for >80% of those affected. Increasingly automated approaches are being developed for self-administered digital hearing assessments without the direct involvement of professionals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide an overview of digital approaches in automated and machine learning assessments of hearing using pure-tone audiometry and to focus on the aspects related to accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency. This review is an extension of a 2013 systematic review. METHODS: A search across the electronic databases of PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant reports from the peer-reviewed literature. Key information about each report’s scope and details was collected to assess the commonalities among the approaches. RESULTS: A total of 56 reports from 2012 to June 2021 were included. From this selection, 27 unique automated approaches were identified. Machine learning approaches require fewer trials than conventional threshold-seeking approaches, and personal digital devices make assessments more affordable and accessible. Validity can be enhanced using digital technologies for quality surveillance, including noise monitoring and detecting inconclusive results. CONCLUSIONS: In the past 10 years, an increasing number of automated approaches have reported similar accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency as manual hearing assessments. New developments, including machine learning approaches, offer features, versatility, and cost-effectiveness beyond manual audiometry. Used within identified limitations, automated assessments using digital devices can support task-shifting, self-care, telehealth, and clinical care pathways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8851345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88513452022-03-10 Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review Wasmann, Jan-Willem Pragt, Leontien Eikelboom, Robert Swanepoel, De Wet J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Hearing loss affects 1 in 5 people worldwide and is estimated to affect 1 in 4 by 2050. Treatment relies on the accurate diagnosis of hearing loss; however, this first step is out of reach for >80% of those affected. Increasingly automated approaches are being developed for self-administered digital hearing assessments without the direct involvement of professionals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide an overview of digital approaches in automated and machine learning assessments of hearing using pure-tone audiometry and to focus on the aspects related to accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency. This review is an extension of a 2013 systematic review. METHODS: A search across the electronic databases of PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant reports from the peer-reviewed literature. Key information about each report’s scope and details was collected to assess the commonalities among the approaches. RESULTS: A total of 56 reports from 2012 to June 2021 were included. From this selection, 27 unique automated approaches were identified. Machine learning approaches require fewer trials than conventional threshold-seeking approaches, and personal digital devices make assessments more affordable and accessible. Validity can be enhanced using digital technologies for quality surveillance, including noise monitoring and detecting inconclusive results. CONCLUSIONS: In the past 10 years, an increasing number of automated approaches have reported similar accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency as manual hearing assessments. New developments, including machine learning approaches, offer features, versatility, and cost-effectiveness beyond manual audiometry. Used within identified limitations, automated assessments using digital devices can support task-shifting, self-care, telehealth, and clinical care pathways. JMIR Publications 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8851345/ /pubmed/34919056 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32581 Text en ©Jan-Willem Wasmann, Leontien Pragt, Robert Eikelboom, De Wet Swanepoel. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 02.02.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Wasmann, Jan-Willem Pragt, Leontien Eikelboom, Robert Swanepoel, De Wet Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review |
title | Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review |
title_full | Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review |
title_short | Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review |
title_sort | digital approaches to automated and machine learning assessments of hearing: scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919056 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wasmannjanwillem digitalapproachestoautomatedandmachinelearningassessmentsofhearingscopingreview AT pragtleontien digitalapproachestoautomatedandmachinelearningassessmentsofhearingscopingreview AT eikelboomrobert digitalapproachestoautomatedandmachinelearningassessmentsofhearingscopingreview AT swanepoeldewet digitalapproachestoautomatedandmachinelearningassessmentsofhearingscopingreview |