Cargando…
Sense and Sensibility: Characterizing Social Media Users Regarding the Use of Controversial Terms for COVID-19
With the world-wide development of 2019 novel coronavirus, although WHO has officially announced the disease as COVID-19, one controversial term - “Chinese Virus” is still being used by a great number of people. In the meantime, global online media coverage about COVID-19-related racial attacks incr...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IEEE
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2020.2996401 |
Sumario: | With the world-wide development of 2019 novel coronavirus, although WHO has officially announced the disease as COVID-19, one controversial term - “Chinese Virus” is still being used by a great number of people. In the meantime, global online media coverage about COVID-19-related racial attacks increases steadily, most of which are anti-Chinese or anti-Asian. As this pandemic becomes increasingly severe, more people start to talk about it on social media platforms such as Twitter. When they refer to COVID-19, there are mainly two ways: using controversial terms like “Chinese Virus” or “Wuhan Virus”, or using non-controversial terms like “Coronavirus”. In this article, we attempt to characterize the Twitter users who use controversial terms and those who use non-controversial terms. We use the Tweepy API to retrieve 17 million related tweets and the information of their authors. We find the significant differences between these two groups of Twitter users across their demographics, user-level features like the number of followers, political following status, as well as their geo-locations. Moreover, we apply classification models to predict Twitter users who are more likely to use controversial terms. To our best knowledge, this is the first large-scale social media-based study to characterize users with respect to their usage of controversial terms during a major crisis. |
---|