Cargando…
Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals. METHODS: Sixty‐one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 ye...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12665 |
_version_ | 1784652848335683584 |
---|---|
author | Rowe, Matthew K. Claughton, Andrew Davis, Jason Yee, Lauren Kaye, Gerald C. Dauber, Kieran Hill, John Gould, Paul A. |
author_facet | Rowe, Matthew K. Claughton, Andrew Davis, Jason Yee, Lauren Kaye, Gerald C. Dauber, Kieran Hill, John Gould, Paul A. |
author_sort | Rowe, Matthew K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals. METHODS: Sixty‐one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 years) with CTI‐dependent AFL underwent ablation using a maximum voltage‐guided approach, randomized to either standard 8 mm non‐irrigated catheter with bipolar signals or IntellaTip MiFi catheter using ME signals alone. RESULTS: Acute bidirectional block was achieved in 97%. Mean follow‐up was 16.7 ± 10 months. The median number of ablation lesions was 13 in both groups (range 3–62 vs. 1–43, p = .85). No significant differences were observed in AFL recurrences (17% vs. 11%, p = .7), median procedure durations (97 min [interquartile range (IQR), 71–121] vs. 87 min [IQR, 72–107], p = .55) or fluoroscopy times (31 min [IQR, 21–52] vs. 38 min [IQR, 25–70], p = .56). Amplitudes of ME signals were on average 160% greater than blinded bipolar signals. In 23.7% of lesions where bipolar signals were difficult to interpret, 13.6% showed a clear ME signal. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the effectiveness of CTI ablation guided by ME signals, compared with using bipolar signals from a standard 8 mm ablation catheter. While ME signal amplitudes were larger and sometimes present when the bipolar signal was unclear, this did not improve procedural characteristics or outcomes. The results suggest future research should focus on lesion integrity rather than signal sensing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8851573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88515732022-02-25 Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial Rowe, Matthew K. Claughton, Andrew Davis, Jason Yee, Lauren Kaye, Gerald C. Dauber, Kieran Hill, John Gould, Paul A. J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals. METHODS: Sixty‐one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 years) with CTI‐dependent AFL underwent ablation using a maximum voltage‐guided approach, randomized to either standard 8 mm non‐irrigated catheter with bipolar signals or IntellaTip MiFi catheter using ME signals alone. RESULTS: Acute bidirectional block was achieved in 97%. Mean follow‐up was 16.7 ± 10 months. The median number of ablation lesions was 13 in both groups (range 3–62 vs. 1–43, p = .85). No significant differences were observed in AFL recurrences (17% vs. 11%, p = .7), median procedure durations (97 min [interquartile range (IQR), 71–121] vs. 87 min [IQR, 72–107], p = .55) or fluoroscopy times (31 min [IQR, 21–52] vs. 38 min [IQR, 25–70], p = .56). Amplitudes of ME signals were on average 160% greater than blinded bipolar signals. In 23.7% of lesions where bipolar signals were difficult to interpret, 13.6% showed a clear ME signal. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the effectiveness of CTI ablation guided by ME signals, compared with using bipolar signals from a standard 8 mm ablation catheter. While ME signal amplitudes were larger and sometimes present when the bipolar signal was unclear, this did not improve procedural characteristics or outcomes. The results suggest future research should focus on lesion integrity rather than signal sensing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8851573/ /pubmed/35222756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12665 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rowe, Matthew K. Claughton, Andrew Davis, Jason Yee, Lauren Kaye, Gerald C. Dauber, Kieran Hill, John Gould, Paul A. Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial |
title | Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial |
title_full | Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial |
title_short | Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial |
title_sort | ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: a randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rowematthewk ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT claughtonandrew ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT davisjason ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yeelauren ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kayegeraldc ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dauberkieran ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hilljohn ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gouldpaula ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial |