Cargando…

Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals. METHODS: Sixty‐one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rowe, Matthew K., Claughton, Andrew, Davis, Jason, Yee, Lauren, Kaye, Gerald C., Dauber, Kieran, Hill, John, Gould, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12665
_version_ 1784652848335683584
author Rowe, Matthew K.
Claughton, Andrew
Davis, Jason
Yee, Lauren
Kaye, Gerald C.
Dauber, Kieran
Hill, John
Gould, Paul A.
author_facet Rowe, Matthew K.
Claughton, Andrew
Davis, Jason
Yee, Lauren
Kaye, Gerald C.
Dauber, Kieran
Hill, John
Gould, Paul A.
author_sort Rowe, Matthew K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals. METHODS: Sixty‐one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 years) with CTI‐dependent AFL underwent ablation using a maximum voltage‐guided approach, randomized to either standard 8 mm non‐irrigated catheter with bipolar signals or IntellaTip MiFi catheter using ME signals alone. RESULTS: Acute bidirectional block was achieved in 97%. Mean follow‐up was 16.7 ± 10 months. The median number of ablation lesions was 13 in both groups (range 3–62 vs. 1–43, p = .85). No significant differences were observed in AFL recurrences (17% vs. 11%, p = .7), median procedure durations (97 min [interquartile range (IQR), 71–121] vs. 87 min [IQR, 72–107], p = .55) or fluoroscopy times (31 min [IQR, 21–52] vs. 38 min [IQR, 25–70], p = .56). Amplitudes of ME signals were on average 160% greater than blinded bipolar signals. In 23.7% of lesions where bipolar signals were difficult to interpret, 13.6% showed a clear ME signal. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the effectiveness of CTI ablation guided by ME signals, compared with using bipolar signals from a standard 8 mm ablation catheter. While ME signal amplitudes were larger and sometimes present when the bipolar signal was unclear, this did not improve procedural characteristics or outcomes. The results suggest future research should focus on lesion integrity rather than signal sensing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8851573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88515732022-02-25 Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial Rowe, Matthew K. Claughton, Andrew Davis, Jason Yee, Lauren Kaye, Gerald C. Dauber, Kieran Hill, John Gould, Paul A. J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals. METHODS: Sixty‐one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 years) with CTI‐dependent AFL underwent ablation using a maximum voltage‐guided approach, randomized to either standard 8 mm non‐irrigated catheter with bipolar signals or IntellaTip MiFi catheter using ME signals alone. RESULTS: Acute bidirectional block was achieved in 97%. Mean follow‐up was 16.7 ± 10 months. The median number of ablation lesions was 13 in both groups (range 3–62 vs. 1–43, p = .85). No significant differences were observed in AFL recurrences (17% vs. 11%, p = .7), median procedure durations (97 min [interquartile range (IQR), 71–121] vs. 87 min [IQR, 72–107], p = .55) or fluoroscopy times (31 min [IQR, 21–52] vs. 38 min [IQR, 25–70], p = .56). Amplitudes of ME signals were on average 160% greater than blinded bipolar signals. In 23.7% of lesions where bipolar signals were difficult to interpret, 13.6% showed a clear ME signal. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the effectiveness of CTI ablation guided by ME signals, compared with using bipolar signals from a standard 8 mm ablation catheter. While ME signal amplitudes were larger and sometimes present when the bipolar signal was unclear, this did not improve procedural characteristics or outcomes. The results suggest future research should focus on lesion integrity rather than signal sensing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8851573/ /pubmed/35222756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12665 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rowe, Matthew K.
Claughton, Andrew
Davis, Jason
Yee, Lauren
Kaye, Gerald C.
Dauber, Kieran
Hill, John
Gould, Paul A.
Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial
title Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial
title_full Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial
title_short Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial
title_sort ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage‐guided ablation: a randomized, controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12665
work_keys_str_mv AT rowematthewk ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT claughtonandrew ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT davisjason ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yeelauren ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kayegeraldc ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dauberkieran ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hilljohn ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gouldpaula ablationoftypicalatrialflutterusingminielectrodemeasurementsformaximumvoltageguidedablationarandomizedcontrolledtrial