Cargando…

Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning

BACKGROUND: Surgeons have widely adopted endoscopic suturing techniques using conventional laparoscopic instruments and the more advanced robotic systems. The FlexDex is a novel articulating laparoscopic needle driver providing enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates and com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voskens, F. J., van der Schans, E. M., Ruurda, J. P., Broeders, I. A. M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2
_version_ 1784652891209859072
author Voskens, F. J.
van der Schans, E. M.
Ruurda, J. P.
Broeders, I. A. M. J.
author_facet Voskens, F. J.
van der Schans, E. M.
Ruurda, J. P.
Broeders, I. A. M. J.
author_sort Voskens, F. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgeons have widely adopted endoscopic suturing techniques using conventional laparoscopic instruments and the more advanced robotic systems. The FlexDex is a novel articulating laparoscopic needle driver providing enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates and compares the learning curve of endoscopic suturing with conventional laparoscopy, the FlexDex and robotic suturing in novices. METHODS: Participants performed a minimal invasive suturing task in three different ways in a randomized order: with a conventional laparoscopic needle driver, using the FlexDex needle driver and third, using the Da Vinci Si surgical system. Primary outcome was suturing task time. Secondary outcome parameters were assessment of suturing quality and workload perception. RESULTS: A total of 10 novice participants were included and completed a total of 300 sessions. Median (IQR) suturing time of the first 5 sessions was 231 s (188–291) in the laparoscopic group versus 378 s (282–471) in the FlexDex group versus 189 s (160–247) in the DaVinci Si group. The last 5 sessions showed significant reduction of median suturing time of 143 s (120–190), 232 s (180–265) and 172 s (134–199) respectively. Analysis identified that the learning curve for the laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si was reached in 5 sessions, compared to 8 sessions for the Flexdex. The laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si showed a significant shorter median suturing time compared to the FlexDex (p = 0.00). The FlexDex quality assessment scores were significantly lower compared to the laparoscopic (p = 0.00) and robotic (p = 0.00) scores and perceived workload remains high for the FlexDex users. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo endoscopic suturing with the FlexDex demonstrated a prolonged learning curve compared to laparoscopic and robotic suturing. The learning curve of the FlexDex is fundamentally different from conventional laparoscopic and robotic instruments. This study provides further insights in the implementation and training of endoscopic suturing techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8851769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88517692022-02-22 Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning Voskens, F. J. van der Schans, E. M. Ruurda, J. P. Broeders, I. A. M. J. BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgeons have widely adopted endoscopic suturing techniques using conventional laparoscopic instruments and the more advanced robotic systems. The FlexDex is a novel articulating laparoscopic needle driver providing enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates and compares the learning curve of endoscopic suturing with conventional laparoscopy, the FlexDex and robotic suturing in novices. METHODS: Participants performed a minimal invasive suturing task in three different ways in a randomized order: with a conventional laparoscopic needle driver, using the FlexDex needle driver and third, using the Da Vinci Si surgical system. Primary outcome was suturing task time. Secondary outcome parameters were assessment of suturing quality and workload perception. RESULTS: A total of 10 novice participants were included and completed a total of 300 sessions. Median (IQR) suturing time of the first 5 sessions was 231 s (188–291) in the laparoscopic group versus 378 s (282–471) in the FlexDex group versus 189 s (160–247) in the DaVinci Si group. The last 5 sessions showed significant reduction of median suturing time of 143 s (120–190), 232 s (180–265) and 172 s (134–199) respectively. Analysis identified that the learning curve for the laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si was reached in 5 sessions, compared to 8 sessions for the Flexdex. The laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si showed a significant shorter median suturing time compared to the FlexDex (p = 0.00). The FlexDex quality assessment scores were significantly lower compared to the laparoscopic (p = 0.00) and robotic (p = 0.00) scores and perceived workload remains high for the FlexDex users. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo endoscopic suturing with the FlexDex demonstrated a prolonged learning curve compared to laparoscopic and robotic suturing. The learning curve of the FlexDex is fundamentally different from conventional laparoscopic and robotic instruments. This study provides further insights in the implementation and training of endoscopic suturing techniques. BioMed Central 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8851769/ /pubmed/35172810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Voskens, F. J.
van der Schans, E. M.
Ruurda, J. P.
Broeders, I. A. M. J.
Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
title Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
title_full Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
title_fullStr Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
title_short Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
title_sort endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2
work_keys_str_mv AT voskensfj endoscopicsurgerysuturingtechniquesarandomizedstudyonlearning
AT vanderschansem endoscopicsurgerysuturingtechniquesarandomizedstudyonlearning
AT ruurdajp endoscopicsurgerysuturingtechniquesarandomizedstudyonlearning
AT broedersiamj endoscopicsurgerysuturingtechniquesarandomizedstudyonlearning