Cargando…
Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
BACKGROUND: Surgeons have widely adopted endoscopic suturing techniques using conventional laparoscopic instruments and the more advanced robotic systems. The FlexDex is a novel articulating laparoscopic needle driver providing enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates and com...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2 |
_version_ | 1784652891209859072 |
---|---|
author | Voskens, F. J. van der Schans, E. M. Ruurda, J. P. Broeders, I. A. M. J. |
author_facet | Voskens, F. J. van der Schans, E. M. Ruurda, J. P. Broeders, I. A. M. J. |
author_sort | Voskens, F. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgeons have widely adopted endoscopic suturing techniques using conventional laparoscopic instruments and the more advanced robotic systems. The FlexDex is a novel articulating laparoscopic needle driver providing enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates and compares the learning curve of endoscopic suturing with conventional laparoscopy, the FlexDex and robotic suturing in novices. METHODS: Participants performed a minimal invasive suturing task in three different ways in a randomized order: with a conventional laparoscopic needle driver, using the FlexDex needle driver and third, using the Da Vinci Si surgical system. Primary outcome was suturing task time. Secondary outcome parameters were assessment of suturing quality and workload perception. RESULTS: A total of 10 novice participants were included and completed a total of 300 sessions. Median (IQR) suturing time of the first 5 sessions was 231 s (188–291) in the laparoscopic group versus 378 s (282–471) in the FlexDex group versus 189 s (160–247) in the DaVinci Si group. The last 5 sessions showed significant reduction of median suturing time of 143 s (120–190), 232 s (180–265) and 172 s (134–199) respectively. Analysis identified that the learning curve for the laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si was reached in 5 sessions, compared to 8 sessions for the Flexdex. The laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si showed a significant shorter median suturing time compared to the FlexDex (p = 0.00). The FlexDex quality assessment scores were significantly lower compared to the laparoscopic (p = 0.00) and robotic (p = 0.00) scores and perceived workload remains high for the FlexDex users. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo endoscopic suturing with the FlexDex demonstrated a prolonged learning curve compared to laparoscopic and robotic suturing. The learning curve of the FlexDex is fundamentally different from conventional laparoscopic and robotic instruments. This study provides further insights in the implementation and training of endoscopic suturing techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8851769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88517692022-02-22 Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning Voskens, F. J. van der Schans, E. M. Ruurda, J. P. Broeders, I. A. M. J. BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgeons have widely adopted endoscopic suturing techniques using conventional laparoscopic instruments and the more advanced robotic systems. The FlexDex is a novel articulating laparoscopic needle driver providing enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates and compares the learning curve of endoscopic suturing with conventional laparoscopy, the FlexDex and robotic suturing in novices. METHODS: Participants performed a minimal invasive suturing task in three different ways in a randomized order: with a conventional laparoscopic needle driver, using the FlexDex needle driver and third, using the Da Vinci Si surgical system. Primary outcome was suturing task time. Secondary outcome parameters were assessment of suturing quality and workload perception. RESULTS: A total of 10 novice participants were included and completed a total of 300 sessions. Median (IQR) suturing time of the first 5 sessions was 231 s (188–291) in the laparoscopic group versus 378 s (282–471) in the FlexDex group versus 189 s (160–247) in the DaVinci Si group. The last 5 sessions showed significant reduction of median suturing time of 143 s (120–190), 232 s (180–265) and 172 s (134–199) respectively. Analysis identified that the learning curve for the laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si was reached in 5 sessions, compared to 8 sessions for the Flexdex. The laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si showed a significant shorter median suturing time compared to the FlexDex (p = 0.00). The FlexDex quality assessment scores were significantly lower compared to the laparoscopic (p = 0.00) and robotic (p = 0.00) scores and perceived workload remains high for the FlexDex users. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo endoscopic suturing with the FlexDex demonstrated a prolonged learning curve compared to laparoscopic and robotic suturing. The learning curve of the FlexDex is fundamentally different from conventional laparoscopic and robotic instruments. This study provides further insights in the implementation and training of endoscopic suturing techniques. BioMed Central 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8851769/ /pubmed/35172810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Voskens, F. J. van der Schans, E. M. Ruurda, J. P. Broeders, I. A. M. J. Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning |
title | Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning |
title_full | Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning |
title_short | Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning |
title_sort | endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voskensfj endoscopicsurgerysuturingtechniquesarandomizedstudyonlearning AT vanderschansem endoscopicsurgerysuturingtechniquesarandomizedstudyonlearning AT ruurdajp endoscopicsurgerysuturingtechniquesarandomizedstudyonlearning AT broedersiamj endoscopicsurgerysuturingtechniquesarandomizedstudyonlearning |