Cargando…
Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter
BACKGROUND: Twitter offers opportunities to share resources, engage in online discussions, and network with other professionals. In medical education, Twitter is also being used for professional development. Little is known about the level of engagement in topical chats related to medical education....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211072723 |
_version_ | 1784652927978176512 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Binbin Beck Dallaghan, Gary Gomez, Michael Holihan, Stephen |
author_facet | Zheng, Binbin Beck Dallaghan, Gary Gomez, Michael Holihan, Stephen |
author_sort | Zheng, Binbin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Twitter offers opportunities to share resources, engage in online discussions, and network with other professionals. In medical education, Twitter is also being used for professional development. Little is known about the level of engagement in topical chats related to medical education. This study explores how medical educators participated and engaged in Twitter-facilitated discussion activity using #MedEdChat. METHODS: All twitter chat transcripts using the hashtag #MedEdChat from Thursday night synchronous discussions were collected between January and December 2019. A total of 37 discussion topics were included. To answer the first research question about the overall participation, descriptive statistics were used to analyze the number of participants, posts, retweets, and interactions for each week's discussion. To answer the second question about types of discussion participants engaged in during weekly chats, a combination of top-down and bottom-up coding strategy was adopted with three categories: functional, social, and content. RESULTS: This study identified five themes from #MedEdChat discussions: curriculum, faculty development, scholarship, assessment, and general medical education topics. All discussions had an average of 26 participants, with an average of 145 total posts, including 37 original posts, 52 retweets, and 56 interactions (mentions or replies using @). In terms of types of discussion, content-related tweets were most frequently posted, followed by functional and social tweets. CONCLUSION: By identifying the patterns of participation and content of discussions, preliminary findings suggest implications for future study to further explore the social interactions and knowledge building processes among online participants in the Twitter-facilitated medical education online community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8851928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88519282022-02-18 Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter Zheng, Binbin Beck Dallaghan, Gary Gomez, Michael Holihan, Stephen J Med Educ Curric Dev Short Report BACKGROUND: Twitter offers opportunities to share resources, engage in online discussions, and network with other professionals. In medical education, Twitter is also being used for professional development. Little is known about the level of engagement in topical chats related to medical education. This study explores how medical educators participated and engaged in Twitter-facilitated discussion activity using #MedEdChat. METHODS: All twitter chat transcripts using the hashtag #MedEdChat from Thursday night synchronous discussions were collected between January and December 2019. A total of 37 discussion topics were included. To answer the first research question about the overall participation, descriptive statistics were used to analyze the number of participants, posts, retweets, and interactions for each week's discussion. To answer the second question about types of discussion participants engaged in during weekly chats, a combination of top-down and bottom-up coding strategy was adopted with three categories: functional, social, and content. RESULTS: This study identified five themes from #MedEdChat discussions: curriculum, faculty development, scholarship, assessment, and general medical education topics. All discussions had an average of 26 participants, with an average of 145 total posts, including 37 original posts, 52 retweets, and 56 interactions (mentions or replies using @). In terms of types of discussion, content-related tweets were most frequently posted, followed by functional and social tweets. CONCLUSION: By identifying the patterns of participation and content of discussions, preliminary findings suggest implications for future study to further explore the social interactions and knowledge building processes among online participants in the Twitter-facilitated medical education online community. SAGE Publications 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8851928/ /pubmed/35187263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211072723 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Short Report Zheng, Binbin Beck Dallaghan, Gary Gomez, Michael Holihan, Stephen Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter |
title | Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter |
title_full | Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter |
title_fullStr | Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter |
title_short | Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter |
title_sort | exploring online participation and discussion in an online professional learning activity on twitter |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211072723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengbinbin exploringonlineparticipationanddiscussioninanonlineprofessionallearningactivityontwitter AT beckdallaghangary exploringonlineparticipationanddiscussioninanonlineprofessionallearningactivityontwitter AT gomezmichael exploringonlineparticipationanddiscussioninanonlineprofessionallearningactivityontwitter AT holihanstephen exploringonlineparticipationanddiscussioninanonlineprofessionallearningactivityontwitter |