Cargando…

Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter

BACKGROUND: Twitter offers opportunities to share resources, engage in online discussions, and network with other professionals. In medical education, Twitter is also being used for professional development. Little is known about the level of engagement in topical chats related to medical education....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Binbin, Beck Dallaghan, Gary, Gomez, Michael, Holihan, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211072723
_version_ 1784652927978176512
author Zheng, Binbin
Beck Dallaghan, Gary
Gomez, Michael
Holihan, Stephen
author_facet Zheng, Binbin
Beck Dallaghan, Gary
Gomez, Michael
Holihan, Stephen
author_sort Zheng, Binbin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Twitter offers opportunities to share resources, engage in online discussions, and network with other professionals. In medical education, Twitter is also being used for professional development. Little is known about the level of engagement in topical chats related to medical education. This study explores how medical educators participated and engaged in Twitter-facilitated discussion activity using #MedEdChat. METHODS: All twitter chat transcripts using the hashtag #MedEdChat from Thursday night synchronous discussions were collected between January and December 2019. A total of 37 discussion topics were included. To answer the first research question about the overall participation, descriptive statistics were used to analyze the number of participants, posts, retweets, and interactions for each week's discussion. To answer the second question about types of discussion participants engaged in during weekly chats, a combination of top-down and bottom-up coding strategy was adopted with three categories: functional, social, and content. RESULTS: This study identified five themes from #MedEdChat discussions: curriculum, faculty development, scholarship, assessment, and general medical education topics. All discussions had an average of 26 participants, with an average of 145 total posts, including 37 original posts, 52 retweets, and 56 interactions (mentions or replies using @). In terms of types of discussion, content-related tweets were most frequently posted, followed by functional and social tweets. CONCLUSION: By identifying the patterns of participation and content of discussions, preliminary findings suggest implications for future study to further explore the social interactions and knowledge building processes among online participants in the Twitter-facilitated medical education online community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8851928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88519282022-02-18 Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter Zheng, Binbin Beck Dallaghan, Gary Gomez, Michael Holihan, Stephen J Med Educ Curric Dev Short Report BACKGROUND: Twitter offers opportunities to share resources, engage in online discussions, and network with other professionals. In medical education, Twitter is also being used for professional development. Little is known about the level of engagement in topical chats related to medical education. This study explores how medical educators participated and engaged in Twitter-facilitated discussion activity using #MedEdChat. METHODS: All twitter chat transcripts using the hashtag #MedEdChat from Thursday night synchronous discussions were collected between January and December 2019. A total of 37 discussion topics were included. To answer the first research question about the overall participation, descriptive statistics were used to analyze the number of participants, posts, retweets, and interactions for each week's discussion. To answer the second question about types of discussion participants engaged in during weekly chats, a combination of top-down and bottom-up coding strategy was adopted with three categories: functional, social, and content. RESULTS: This study identified five themes from #MedEdChat discussions: curriculum, faculty development, scholarship, assessment, and general medical education topics. All discussions had an average of 26 participants, with an average of 145 total posts, including 37 original posts, 52 retweets, and 56 interactions (mentions or replies using @). In terms of types of discussion, content-related tweets were most frequently posted, followed by functional and social tweets. CONCLUSION: By identifying the patterns of participation and content of discussions, preliminary findings suggest implications for future study to further explore the social interactions and knowledge building processes among online participants in the Twitter-facilitated medical education online community. SAGE Publications 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8851928/ /pubmed/35187263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211072723 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Short Report
Zheng, Binbin
Beck Dallaghan, Gary
Gomez, Michael
Holihan, Stephen
Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter
title Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter
title_full Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter
title_fullStr Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter
title_short Exploring Online Participation and Discussion in an Online Professional Learning Activity on Twitter
title_sort exploring online participation and discussion in an online professional learning activity on twitter
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211072723
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengbinbin exploringonlineparticipationanddiscussioninanonlineprofessionallearningactivityontwitter
AT beckdallaghangary exploringonlineparticipationanddiscussioninanonlineprofessionallearningactivityontwitter
AT gomezmichael exploringonlineparticipationanddiscussioninanonlineprofessionallearningactivityontwitter
AT holihanstephen exploringonlineparticipationanddiscussioninanonlineprofessionallearningactivityontwitter