Cargando…

3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial

In this randomized controlled pilot trial, we compared three-dimensional (3D)-printed made-to-measure splints to conventional custom-made thermoplastic splints. In a clinical setting, we evaluated their general applicability and possible benefits for immobilization in hand surgical patients. We incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waldburger, Leonie, Schaller, Romain, Furthmüller, Christina, Schrepfer, Lorena, Schaefer, Dirk J., Kaempfen, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187278
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.474
_version_ 1784652989867229184
author Waldburger, Leonie
Schaller, Romain
Furthmüller, Christina
Schrepfer, Lorena
Schaefer, Dirk J.
Kaempfen, Alexandre
author_facet Waldburger, Leonie
Schaller, Romain
Furthmüller, Christina
Schrepfer, Lorena
Schaefer, Dirk J.
Kaempfen, Alexandre
author_sort Waldburger, Leonie
collection PubMed
description In this randomized controlled pilot trial, we compared three-dimensional (3D)-printed made-to-measure splints to conventional custom-made thermoplastic splints. In a clinical setting, we evaluated their general applicability and possible benefits for immobilization in hand surgical patients. We included 20 patients with an indication for immobilization of at least 4 weeks, regardless of the splint design. Patient comfort and satisfaction were assessed with questionnaires at splint fitting, as well as 2 and 4–6 weeks later. The 3D splints were designed and printed in-house with polylactic acid from a 3D surface scan. Our data suggest that 3D-printed splinting is feasible, and patient satisfaction ratings were similar for 3D-printed and thermoplastic splints. The 3D splint production process needs to be optimized and other materials need to be tested before routine implementation is possible or more patients can be enrolled in further studies. Validated quality assessment tools for current splinting are lacking, and further investigation is necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8852196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88521962022-02-18 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial Waldburger, Leonie Schaller, Romain Furthmüller, Christina Schrepfer, Lorena Schaefer, Dirk J. Kaempfen, Alexandre Int J Bioprint RESEARCH article In this randomized controlled pilot trial, we compared three-dimensional (3D)-printed made-to-measure splints to conventional custom-made thermoplastic splints. In a clinical setting, we evaluated their general applicability and possible benefits for immobilization in hand surgical patients. We included 20 patients with an indication for immobilization of at least 4 weeks, regardless of the splint design. Patient comfort and satisfaction were assessed with questionnaires at splint fitting, as well as 2 and 4–6 weeks later. The 3D splints were designed and printed in-house with polylactic acid from a 3D surface scan. Our data suggest that 3D-printed splinting is feasible, and patient satisfaction ratings were similar for 3D-printed and thermoplastic splints. The 3D splint production process needs to be optimized and other materials need to be tested before routine implementation is possible or more patients can be enrolled in further studies. Validated quality assessment tools for current splinting are lacking, and further investigation is necessary. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8852196/ /pubmed/35187278 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.474 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Waldburger, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH article
Waldburger, Leonie
Schaller, Romain
Furthmüller, Christina
Schrepfer, Lorena
Schaefer, Dirk J.
Kaempfen, Alexandre
3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial
title 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial
title_full 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial
title_fullStr 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial
title_full_unstemmed 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial
title_short 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial
title_sort 3d-printed hand splints versus thermoplastic splints: a randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial
topic RESEARCH article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187278
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.474
work_keys_str_mv AT waldburgerleonie 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial
AT schallerromain 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial
AT furthmullerchristina 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial
AT schrepferlorena 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial
AT schaeferdirkj 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial
AT kaempfenalexandre 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial