Cargando…
3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial
In this randomized controlled pilot trial, we compared three-dimensional (3D)-printed made-to-measure splints to conventional custom-made thermoplastic splints. In a clinical setting, we evaluated their general applicability and possible benefits for immobilization in hand surgical patients. We incl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187278 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.474 |
_version_ | 1784652989867229184 |
---|---|
author | Waldburger, Leonie Schaller, Romain Furthmüller, Christina Schrepfer, Lorena Schaefer, Dirk J. Kaempfen, Alexandre |
author_facet | Waldburger, Leonie Schaller, Romain Furthmüller, Christina Schrepfer, Lorena Schaefer, Dirk J. Kaempfen, Alexandre |
author_sort | Waldburger, Leonie |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this randomized controlled pilot trial, we compared three-dimensional (3D)-printed made-to-measure splints to conventional custom-made thermoplastic splints. In a clinical setting, we evaluated their general applicability and possible benefits for immobilization in hand surgical patients. We included 20 patients with an indication for immobilization of at least 4 weeks, regardless of the splint design. Patient comfort and satisfaction were assessed with questionnaires at splint fitting, as well as 2 and 4–6 weeks later. The 3D splints were designed and printed in-house with polylactic acid from a 3D surface scan. Our data suggest that 3D-printed splinting is feasible, and patient satisfaction ratings were similar for 3D-printed and thermoplastic splints. The 3D splint production process needs to be optimized and other materials need to be tested before routine implementation is possible or more patients can be enrolled in further studies. Validated quality assessment tools for current splinting are lacking, and further investigation is necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8852196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88521962022-02-18 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial Waldburger, Leonie Schaller, Romain Furthmüller, Christina Schrepfer, Lorena Schaefer, Dirk J. Kaempfen, Alexandre Int J Bioprint RESEARCH article In this randomized controlled pilot trial, we compared three-dimensional (3D)-printed made-to-measure splints to conventional custom-made thermoplastic splints. In a clinical setting, we evaluated their general applicability and possible benefits for immobilization in hand surgical patients. We included 20 patients with an indication for immobilization of at least 4 weeks, regardless of the splint design. Patient comfort and satisfaction were assessed with questionnaires at splint fitting, as well as 2 and 4–6 weeks later. The 3D splints were designed and printed in-house with polylactic acid from a 3D surface scan. Our data suggest that 3D-printed splinting is feasible, and patient satisfaction ratings were similar for 3D-printed and thermoplastic splints. The 3D splint production process needs to be optimized and other materials need to be tested before routine implementation is possible or more patients can be enrolled in further studies. Validated quality assessment tools for current splinting are lacking, and further investigation is necessary. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8852196/ /pubmed/35187278 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.474 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Waldburger, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH article Waldburger, Leonie Schaller, Romain Furthmüller, Christina Schrepfer, Lorena Schaefer, Dirk J. Kaempfen, Alexandre 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial |
title | 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial |
title_full | 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial |
title_fullStr | 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial |
title_short | 3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial |
title_sort | 3d-printed hand splints versus thermoplastic splints: a randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial |
topic | RESEARCH article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187278 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waldburgerleonie 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial AT schallerromain 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial AT furthmullerchristina 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial AT schrepferlorena 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial AT schaeferdirkj 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial AT kaempfenalexandre 3dprintedhandsplintsversusthermoplasticsplintsarandomizedcontrolledpilotfeasibilitytrial |