Cargando…

NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update

OBJECTIVE: To update a rapid review published in 2017, which evaluated the NHS Health Check programme. METHODS: An enlarged body of evidence was used to readdress six research objectives from a rapid review published in 2017, relating to the uptake, patient experiences and effectiveness of the NHS H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanner, L, Kenny, RPW, Still, M, Ling, J, Pearson, F, Thompson, K, Bhardwaj-Gosling, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052832
_version_ 1784653086673862656
author Tanner, L
Kenny, RPW
Still, M
Ling, J
Pearson, F
Thompson, K
Bhardwaj-Gosling, R
author_facet Tanner, L
Kenny, RPW
Still, M
Ling, J
Pearson, F
Thompson, K
Bhardwaj-Gosling, R
author_sort Tanner, L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To update a rapid review published in 2017, which evaluated the NHS Health Check programme. METHODS: An enlarged body of evidence was used to readdress six research objectives from a rapid review published in 2017, relating to the uptake, patient experiences and effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme. Data sources included MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Global Health, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, Google Scholar, Google, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, The Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, OpenGrey and hand searching article reference lists. These searches identified records from between January 1996 and December 2019. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal using the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme checklists were performed in duplicate. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations was implemented. Data were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: 697 studies were identified, and 29 new studies included in the review update. The number of published studies on the uptake, patient experiences and effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme has increased by 43% since the rapid review published in 2017. However, findings from the original review remain largely unchanged. NHS Health Checks led to an overall increase in the detection of raised risk factors and morbidities including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, raised blood pressure, cholesterol and chronic kidney disease. Individuals most likely to attend the NHS Health Check programme included women, persons aged ≥60 years and those from more socioeconomically advantaged backgrounds. Opportunistic invitations increased uptake among men, younger persons and those with a higher deprivation level. CONCLUSIONS: Although results are inconsistent between studies, the NHS Health Check programme is associated with increased detection of heightened cardiovascular disease risk factors and diagnoses. Uptake varied between population subgroups. Opportunistic invitations may increase uptake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8852663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88526632022-03-03 NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update Tanner, L Kenny, RPW Still, M Ling, J Pearson, F Thompson, K Bhardwaj-Gosling, R BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To update a rapid review published in 2017, which evaluated the NHS Health Check programme. METHODS: An enlarged body of evidence was used to readdress six research objectives from a rapid review published in 2017, relating to the uptake, patient experiences and effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme. Data sources included MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Global Health, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, Google Scholar, Google, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, The Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, OpenGrey and hand searching article reference lists. These searches identified records from between January 1996 and December 2019. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal using the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme checklists were performed in duplicate. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations was implemented. Data were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: 697 studies were identified, and 29 new studies included in the review update. The number of published studies on the uptake, patient experiences and effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme has increased by 43% since the rapid review published in 2017. However, findings from the original review remain largely unchanged. NHS Health Checks led to an overall increase in the detection of raised risk factors and morbidities including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, raised blood pressure, cholesterol and chronic kidney disease. Individuals most likely to attend the NHS Health Check programme included women, persons aged ≥60 years and those from more socioeconomically advantaged backgrounds. Opportunistic invitations increased uptake among men, younger persons and those with a higher deprivation level. CONCLUSIONS: Although results are inconsistent between studies, the NHS Health Check programme is associated with increased detection of heightened cardiovascular disease risk factors and diagnoses. Uptake varied between population subgroups. Opportunistic invitations may increase uptake. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8852663/ /pubmed/35172998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052832 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Tanner, L
Kenny, RPW
Still, M
Ling, J
Pearson, F
Thompson, K
Bhardwaj-Gosling, R
NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update
title NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update
title_full NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update
title_fullStr NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update
title_full_unstemmed NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update
title_short NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update
title_sort nhs health check programme: a rapid review update
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052832
work_keys_str_mv AT tannerl nhshealthcheckprogrammearapidreviewupdate
AT kennyrpw nhshealthcheckprogrammearapidreviewupdate
AT stillm nhshealthcheckprogrammearapidreviewupdate
AT lingj nhshealthcheckprogrammearapidreviewupdate
AT pearsonf nhshealthcheckprogrammearapidreviewupdate
AT thompsonk nhshealthcheckprogrammearapidreviewupdate
AT bhardwajgoslingr nhshealthcheckprogrammearapidreviewupdate