Cargando…

Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study

To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block (GNB) and physical therapy (PT) in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis. A prospective randomised study with 102 patients (45–70 years) was performed wherein the patients received ultrasound-guided GNB (n = 51) and PT (n = ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güler, Tuba, Yurdakul, Fatma Gül, Önder, Mustafa Erkut, Erdoğan, Faruk, Yavuz, Kaan, Becenen, Elif, Uçkun, Aslı, Bodur, Hatice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05101-8
_version_ 1784653137083105280
author Güler, Tuba
Yurdakul, Fatma Gül
Önder, Mustafa Erkut
Erdoğan, Faruk
Yavuz, Kaan
Becenen, Elif
Uçkun, Aslı
Bodur, Hatice
author_facet Güler, Tuba
Yurdakul, Fatma Gül
Önder, Mustafa Erkut
Erdoğan, Faruk
Yavuz, Kaan
Becenen, Elif
Uçkun, Aslı
Bodur, Hatice
author_sort Güler, Tuba
collection PubMed
description To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block (GNB) and physical therapy (PT) in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis. A prospective randomised study with 102 patients (45–70 years) was performed wherein the patients received ultrasound-guided GNB (n = 51) and PT (n = 51) along with a standard home exercise programme. Scores for pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and 6-min walking test (6MWT) were assessed pre-treatment and at 2- and 12-weeks post-treatment. Both groups were comparable for sociodemographic characteristics. VAS scores (in mm) in the ultrasound-guided GNB group at 0, 2 and 12 weeks were 7.01 ± 1.36; 3.71 ± 2.18; 5.08 ± 2.22 (p < 0.001) and 6.64 ± 1.99; 4.35 ± 1.09; 5.25 ± 1.33, (p < 0.001) in the PT group. While the increase in the 6MWT test in the 2nd week was similar for both groups (p = 0.073), the increase in walking distance was greater in the ultrasound-guided GNB group at 12 weeks (p = 0.046). As compared to PT, ultrasound-guided GNB is beneficial in reducing pain and increasing functional and physical capacity, with greater retention of effects on the physical capacity seen at 12 weeks. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04782401).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8852952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88529522022-02-18 Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study Güler, Tuba Yurdakul, Fatma Gül Önder, Mustafa Erkut Erdoğan, Faruk Yavuz, Kaan Becenen, Elif Uçkun, Aslı Bodur, Hatice Rheumatol Int Clinical Trials To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block (GNB) and physical therapy (PT) in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis. A prospective randomised study with 102 patients (45–70 years) was performed wherein the patients received ultrasound-guided GNB (n = 51) and PT (n = 51) along with a standard home exercise programme. Scores for pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and 6-min walking test (6MWT) were assessed pre-treatment and at 2- and 12-weeks post-treatment. Both groups were comparable for sociodemographic characteristics. VAS scores (in mm) in the ultrasound-guided GNB group at 0, 2 and 12 weeks were 7.01 ± 1.36; 3.71 ± 2.18; 5.08 ± 2.22 (p < 0.001) and 6.64 ± 1.99; 4.35 ± 1.09; 5.25 ± 1.33, (p < 0.001) in the PT group. While the increase in the 6MWT test in the 2nd week was similar for both groups (p = 0.073), the increase in walking distance was greater in the ultrasound-guided GNB group at 12 weeks (p = 0.046). As compared to PT, ultrasound-guided GNB is beneficial in reducing pain and increasing functional and physical capacity, with greater retention of effects on the physical capacity seen at 12 weeks. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04782401). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8852952/ /pubmed/35165769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05101-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials
Güler, Tuba
Yurdakul, Fatma Gül
Önder, Mustafa Erkut
Erdoğan, Faruk
Yavuz, Kaan
Becenen, Elif
Uçkun, Aslı
Bodur, Hatice
Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study
title Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study
title_full Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study
title_short Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study
title_sort ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus physical therapy for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised study
topic Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8852952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05101-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gulertuba ultrasoundguidedgenicularnerveblockversusphysicaltherapyforchronickneeosteoarthritisaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT yurdakulfatmagul ultrasoundguidedgenicularnerveblockversusphysicaltherapyforchronickneeosteoarthritisaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT ondermustafaerkut ultrasoundguidedgenicularnerveblockversusphysicaltherapyforchronickneeosteoarthritisaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT erdoganfaruk ultrasoundguidedgenicularnerveblockversusphysicaltherapyforchronickneeosteoarthritisaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT yavuzkaan ultrasoundguidedgenicularnerveblockversusphysicaltherapyforchronickneeosteoarthritisaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT becenenelif ultrasoundguidedgenicularnerveblockversusphysicaltherapyforchronickneeosteoarthritisaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT uckunaslı ultrasoundguidedgenicularnerveblockversusphysicaltherapyforchronickneeosteoarthritisaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT bodurhatice ultrasoundguidedgenicularnerveblockversusphysicaltherapyforchronickneeosteoarthritisaprospectiverandomisedstudy