Cargando…

Bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2

Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is widely employed as point-of-care tests (POCT) for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. The accuracy of LFIA largely depends on the quality of the immunoreagents used. Typical LFIAs to reveal the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cavalera, Simone, Di Nardo, Fabio, Chiarello, Matteo, Serra, Thea, Colitti, Barbara, Guiotto, Cristina, Fagioli, Franca, Cagnazzo, Celeste, Denina, Marco, Palazzo, Annagloria, Artusio, Fiora, Pisano, Roberto, Rosati, Sergio, Baggiani, Claudio, Anfossi, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35149878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-03939-2
_version_ 1784653158890340352
author Cavalera, Simone
Di Nardo, Fabio
Chiarello, Matteo
Serra, Thea
Colitti, Barbara
Guiotto, Cristina
Fagioli, Franca
Cagnazzo, Celeste
Denina, Marco
Palazzo, Annagloria
Artusio, Fiora
Pisano, Roberto
Rosati, Sergio
Baggiani, Claudio
Anfossi, Laura
author_facet Cavalera, Simone
Di Nardo, Fabio
Chiarello, Matteo
Serra, Thea
Colitti, Barbara
Guiotto, Cristina
Fagioli, Franca
Cagnazzo, Celeste
Denina, Marco
Palazzo, Annagloria
Artusio, Fiora
Pisano, Roberto
Rosati, Sergio
Baggiani, Claudio
Anfossi, Laura
author_sort Cavalera, Simone
collection PubMed
description Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is widely employed as point-of-care tests (POCT) for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. The accuracy of LFIA largely depends on the quality of the immunoreagents used. Typical LFIAs to reveal the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) employ anti-human immunoglobulin (hIG) antibodies and recombinant viral antigens, which usually are unstable and poorly soluble. Broad selective bacterial proteins, such as Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) and Streptococcal protein G (SpG) can be considered alternatives to anti-hIG to increase versatility and sensitivity of serological LFIAs because of their high binding capacity, interspecies reactivity, and robustness. We developed two colorimetric LFA devices including SpA and SpG linked to gold nanoparticles (GNP) as detectors and explored the use of a specific, stable, and soluble immunodominant fraction of the nucleocapsid protein from SARS-CoV-2 as the capturing agent. The optimal amount of SpA-GNP and SpG-GNP conjugates and the protein-to-GNP ratios were defined through a full factorial experimental design to maximize the diagnostic sensitivity of the LFIAs. The new LFA devices were applied to analyze 105 human serum samples (69 positive and 36 negatives according to reference molecular diagnostic methods). The results showed higher sensitivity (89.9%, 95% CI 82.7–97.0) and selectivity (91.7%, 82.6–100) for the SpA-based compared to the SpG-based LFA. In addition, 18 serum samples from cats and dogs living with COVID-19 patients were analyzed and 14 showed detectable levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, thus illustrating the flexibility of the SpA- and SpG-based LFAs. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-022-03939-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8853073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88530732022-02-18 Bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Cavalera, Simone Di Nardo, Fabio Chiarello, Matteo Serra, Thea Colitti, Barbara Guiotto, Cristina Fagioli, Franca Cagnazzo, Celeste Denina, Marco Palazzo, Annagloria Artusio, Fiora Pisano, Roberto Rosati, Sergio Baggiani, Claudio Anfossi, Laura Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is widely employed as point-of-care tests (POCT) for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. The accuracy of LFIA largely depends on the quality of the immunoreagents used. Typical LFIAs to reveal the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) employ anti-human immunoglobulin (hIG) antibodies and recombinant viral antigens, which usually are unstable and poorly soluble. Broad selective bacterial proteins, such as Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) and Streptococcal protein G (SpG) can be considered alternatives to anti-hIG to increase versatility and sensitivity of serological LFIAs because of their high binding capacity, interspecies reactivity, and robustness. We developed two colorimetric LFA devices including SpA and SpG linked to gold nanoparticles (GNP) as detectors and explored the use of a specific, stable, and soluble immunodominant fraction of the nucleocapsid protein from SARS-CoV-2 as the capturing agent. The optimal amount of SpA-GNP and SpG-GNP conjugates and the protein-to-GNP ratios were defined through a full factorial experimental design to maximize the diagnostic sensitivity of the LFIAs. The new LFA devices were applied to analyze 105 human serum samples (69 positive and 36 negatives according to reference molecular diagnostic methods). The results showed higher sensitivity (89.9%, 95% CI 82.7–97.0) and selectivity (91.7%, 82.6–100) for the SpA-based compared to the SpG-based LFA. In addition, 18 serum samples from cats and dogs living with COVID-19 patients were analyzed and 14 showed detectable levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, thus illustrating the flexibility of the SpA- and SpG-based LFAs. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-022-03939-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8853073/ /pubmed/35149878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-03939-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Paper
Cavalera, Simone
Di Nardo, Fabio
Chiarello, Matteo
Serra, Thea
Colitti, Barbara
Guiotto, Cristina
Fagioli, Franca
Cagnazzo, Celeste
Denina, Marco
Palazzo, Annagloria
Artusio, Fiora
Pisano, Roberto
Rosati, Sergio
Baggiani, Claudio
Anfossi, Laura
Bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2
title Bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2
title_full Bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2
title_short Bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2
title_sort bacterial ligands as flexible and sensitive detectors in rapid tests for antibodies to sars-cov-2
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35149878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-03939-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cavalerasimone bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT dinardofabio bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT chiarellomatteo bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT serrathea bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT colittibarbara bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT guiottocristina bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT fagiolifranca bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT cagnazzoceleste bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT deninamarco bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT palazzoannagloria bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT artusiofiora bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT pisanoroberto bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT rosatisergio bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT baggianiclaudio bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2
AT anfossilaura bacterialligandsasflexibleandsensitivedetectorsinrapidtestsforantibodiestosarscov2