Cargando…

Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change

BACKGROUND: The Amazon region of Brazil is known both for its significant biological and cultural diversity. It is also a region, like many parts of the country, marked by food insecurity, even amongst its rural agricultural populations. In a novel approach, this paper addresses the networks of exch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schramski, Sam, Barbosa de Lima, Ana Carolina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00342-5
_version_ 1784653211715502080
author Schramski, Sam
Barbosa de Lima, Ana Carolina
author_facet Schramski, Sam
Barbosa de Lima, Ana Carolina
author_sort Schramski, Sam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Amazon region of Brazil is known both for its significant biological and cultural diversity. It is also a region, like many parts of the country, marked by food insecurity, even amongst its rural agricultural populations. In a novel approach, this paper addresses the networks of exchanges of local food and their relationship to the agrobiodiversity of traditional riverine peoples’ (ribeirinho) households in the Central Amazon. Methodologically, it involves mapping the social networks and affinities between households, inventories of known species, and, finally, statistical tests of the relationships between network and subsequent agrobiodiversity. RESULTS: The diversity per area of each land type where food cultivation or management takes place shows how home gardens, fields and orchards are areas of higher diversity and intense cultivation compared to fallow areas. Our findings, however, indicate that a household’s income does appear to be strongly associated with the total agrobiodiversity across cultivation areas. In addition, a household’s agrobiodiversity is significantly associated with the frequency and intensity of food exchanges between households. CONCLUSIONS: Agrobiodiversity cannot be considered separate from the breadth of activities focused on sustenance and yields from the cash economy, which riverine people engage in daily. It seems to be connected to quotidian social interactions and exchanges in both predictable and occasionally subtler ways. Those brokers who serve as prominent actors in rural communities may not always be the most productive or in possession of the largest landholdings, although in some cases they are. Their proclivity for cultivating and harvesting a wide diversity of produce may be equally important if not more so. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-021-00342-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8853342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88533422022-02-18 Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change Schramski, Sam Barbosa de Lima, Ana Carolina Agric Food Secur Research BACKGROUND: The Amazon region of Brazil is known both for its significant biological and cultural diversity. It is also a region, like many parts of the country, marked by food insecurity, even amongst its rural agricultural populations. In a novel approach, this paper addresses the networks of exchanges of local food and their relationship to the agrobiodiversity of traditional riverine peoples’ (ribeirinho) households in the Central Amazon. Methodologically, it involves mapping the social networks and affinities between households, inventories of known species, and, finally, statistical tests of the relationships between network and subsequent agrobiodiversity. RESULTS: The diversity per area of each land type where food cultivation or management takes place shows how home gardens, fields and orchards are areas of higher diversity and intense cultivation compared to fallow areas. Our findings, however, indicate that a household’s income does appear to be strongly associated with the total agrobiodiversity across cultivation areas. In addition, a household’s agrobiodiversity is significantly associated with the frequency and intensity of food exchanges between households. CONCLUSIONS: Agrobiodiversity cannot be considered separate from the breadth of activities focused on sustenance and yields from the cash economy, which riverine people engage in daily. It seems to be connected to quotidian social interactions and exchanges in both predictable and occasionally subtler ways. Those brokers who serve as prominent actors in rural communities may not always be the most productive or in possession of the largest landholdings, although in some cases they are. Their proclivity for cultivating and harvesting a wide diversity of produce may be equally important if not more so. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-021-00342-5. BioMed Central 2022-02-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8853342/ /pubmed/35194513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00342-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schramski, Sam
Barbosa de Lima, Ana Carolina
Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change
title Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change
title_full Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change
title_fullStr Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change
title_full_unstemmed Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change
title_short Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change
title_sort fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00342-5
work_keys_str_mv AT schramskisam fruitfulexchangessocialnetworksandfoodresourcesamidstchange
AT barbosadelimaanacarolina fruitfulexchangessocialnetworksandfoodresourcesamidstchange