Cargando…
Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35176099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264068 |
_version_ | 1784653233543708672 |
---|---|
author | Lago, Alessandra Fabiane Basile-Filho, Anibal de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira Gastaldi, Ada Clarice |
author_facet | Lago, Alessandra Fabiane Basile-Filho, Anibal de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira Gastaldi, Ada Clarice |
author_sort | Lago, Alessandra Fabiane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative to mobilise these patients early. This study aims to identify whether NMES performed within the first 72 hours of septic shock diagnosis or later is safe from a metabolic perspective. METHODS: This is the analysis of two randomised controlled crossover studies. Patients with acute septic shock (within the first 72 hours of diagnosis) and sepsis and septic shock in the late phase (after 72 hours of diagnosis) were eligible. Patients were submitted in a random order to the intervention protocol (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised and NMES) and control (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised without NMES). The patients were allocated in group 1 (intervention and control) or group 2 (control and intervention) with a wash-out period of 4 to 6 hours. Metabolic variables were evaluated by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were analysed in the acute septic shock study and 21 in the late sepsis/septic shock study. There were no significant differences between Oxygen Consumption (VO(2)) values in the acute phase of septic shock when the baseline period, intervention, and control protocols were compared (186.59 ± 46.10; 183.64 ± 41.39; 188.97 ± 44.88, p>0.05- expressed in mL/Kg/min). The same was observed when the VO(2) values in the late phase were compared (224.22 ± 53.09; 226.20 ± 49.64; 226.79 ± 58.25, p>0.05). The other metabolic variables followed the same pattern, with no significant differences between the protocols. When metabolic variables were compared between acute to late phase, significant differences were observed (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As metabolic rates in septic shock patients had no increase during NMES, either in the first 72 hours of diagnosis or later, NMES can be considered safe from a metabolic viewpoint, even despite the higher metabolic demand in the acute phase of shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03193164; NCT03815994. Registered on June 5, 2017; November 13, 2018 (clinicaltrials.gov/). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8853464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88534642022-02-18 Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial Lago, Alessandra Fabiane Basile-Filho, Anibal de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira Gastaldi, Ada Clarice PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative to mobilise these patients early. This study aims to identify whether NMES performed within the first 72 hours of septic shock diagnosis or later is safe from a metabolic perspective. METHODS: This is the analysis of two randomised controlled crossover studies. Patients with acute septic shock (within the first 72 hours of diagnosis) and sepsis and septic shock in the late phase (after 72 hours of diagnosis) were eligible. Patients were submitted in a random order to the intervention protocol (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised and NMES) and control (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised without NMES). The patients were allocated in group 1 (intervention and control) or group 2 (control and intervention) with a wash-out period of 4 to 6 hours. Metabolic variables were evaluated by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were analysed in the acute septic shock study and 21 in the late sepsis/septic shock study. There were no significant differences between Oxygen Consumption (VO(2)) values in the acute phase of septic shock when the baseline period, intervention, and control protocols were compared (186.59 ± 46.10; 183.64 ± 41.39; 188.97 ± 44.88, p>0.05- expressed in mL/Kg/min). The same was observed when the VO(2) values in the late phase were compared (224.22 ± 53.09; 226.20 ± 49.64; 226.79 ± 58.25, p>0.05). The other metabolic variables followed the same pattern, with no significant differences between the protocols. When metabolic variables were compared between acute to late phase, significant differences were observed (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As metabolic rates in septic shock patients had no increase during NMES, either in the first 72 hours of diagnosis or later, NMES can be considered safe from a metabolic viewpoint, even despite the higher metabolic demand in the acute phase of shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03193164; NCT03815994. Registered on June 5, 2017; November 13, 2018 (clinicaltrials.gov/). Public Library of Science 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8853464/ /pubmed/35176099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264068 Text en © 2022 Lago et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lago, Alessandra Fabiane Basile-Filho, Anibal de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira Gastaldi, Ada Clarice Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial |
title | Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial |
title_full | Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial |
title_short | Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial |
title_sort | effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: a randomised crossover clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35176099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lagoalessandrafabiane effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT basilefilhoanibal effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT deoliveiraanamariasiriani effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT desouzahugocelsodutra effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT dossantosdanieleoliveira effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT gastaldiadaclarice effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial |