Cargando…

Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lago, Alessandra Fabiane, Basile-Filho, Anibal, de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani, de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra, dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira, Gastaldi, Ada Clarice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35176099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264068
_version_ 1784653233543708672
author Lago, Alessandra Fabiane
Basile-Filho, Anibal
de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani
de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra
dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira
Gastaldi, Ada Clarice
author_facet Lago, Alessandra Fabiane
Basile-Filho, Anibal
de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani
de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra
dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira
Gastaldi, Ada Clarice
author_sort Lago, Alessandra Fabiane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative to mobilise these patients early. This study aims to identify whether NMES performed within the first 72 hours of septic shock diagnosis or later is safe from a metabolic perspective. METHODS: This is the analysis of two randomised controlled crossover studies. Patients with acute septic shock (within the first 72 hours of diagnosis) and sepsis and septic shock in the late phase (after 72 hours of diagnosis) were eligible. Patients were submitted in a random order to the intervention protocol (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised and NMES) and control (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised without NMES). The patients were allocated in group 1 (intervention and control) or group 2 (control and intervention) with a wash-out period of 4 to 6 hours. Metabolic variables were evaluated by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were analysed in the acute septic shock study and 21 in the late sepsis/septic shock study. There were no significant differences between Oxygen Consumption (VO(2)) values in the acute phase of septic shock when the baseline period, intervention, and control protocols were compared (186.59 ± 46.10; 183.64 ± 41.39; 188.97 ± 44.88, p>0.05- expressed in mL/Kg/min). The same was observed when the VO(2) values in the late phase were compared (224.22 ± 53.09; 226.20 ± 49.64; 226.79 ± 58.25, p>0.05). The other metabolic variables followed the same pattern, with no significant differences between the protocols. When metabolic variables were compared between acute to late phase, significant differences were observed (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As metabolic rates in septic shock patients had no increase during NMES, either in the first 72 hours of diagnosis or later, NMES can be considered safe from a metabolic viewpoint, even despite the higher metabolic demand in the acute phase of shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03193164; NCT03815994. Registered on June 5, 2017; November 13, 2018 (clinicaltrials.gov/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8853464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88534642022-02-18 Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial Lago, Alessandra Fabiane Basile-Filho, Anibal de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira Gastaldi, Ada Clarice PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with sepsis and immobility in the intensive care unit are associated with muscle weakness, and early mobilisation can counteract it. However, during septic shock, mobilisation is often delayed due to the severity of the illness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative to mobilise these patients early. This study aims to identify whether NMES performed within the first 72 hours of septic shock diagnosis or later is safe from a metabolic perspective. METHODS: This is the analysis of two randomised controlled crossover studies. Patients with acute septic shock (within the first 72 hours of diagnosis) and sepsis and septic shock in the late phase (after 72 hours of diagnosis) were eligible. Patients were submitted in a random order to the intervention protocol (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised and NMES) and control (dorsal decubitus position with the lower limbs raised without NMES). The patients were allocated in group 1 (intervention and control) or group 2 (control and intervention) with a wash-out period of 4 to 6 hours. Metabolic variables were evaluated by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were analysed in the acute septic shock study and 21 in the late sepsis/septic shock study. There were no significant differences between Oxygen Consumption (VO(2)) values in the acute phase of septic shock when the baseline period, intervention, and control protocols were compared (186.59 ± 46.10; 183.64 ± 41.39; 188.97 ± 44.88, p>0.05- expressed in mL/Kg/min). The same was observed when the VO(2) values in the late phase were compared (224.22 ± 53.09; 226.20 ± 49.64; 226.79 ± 58.25, p>0.05). The other metabolic variables followed the same pattern, with no significant differences between the protocols. When metabolic variables were compared between acute to late phase, significant differences were observed (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As metabolic rates in septic shock patients had no increase during NMES, either in the first 72 hours of diagnosis or later, NMES can be considered safe from a metabolic viewpoint, even despite the higher metabolic demand in the acute phase of shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03193164; NCT03815994. Registered on June 5, 2017; November 13, 2018 (clinicaltrials.gov/). Public Library of Science 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8853464/ /pubmed/35176099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264068 Text en © 2022 Lago et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lago, Alessandra Fabiane
Basile-Filho, Anibal
de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani
de Souza, Hugo Celso Dutra
dos Santos, Daniele Oliveira
Gastaldi, Ada Clarice
Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial
title Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial
title_full Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial
title_fullStr Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial
title_short Effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: A randomised crossover clinical trial
title_sort effects of physical therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute and late septic shock patients: a randomised crossover clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35176099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264068
work_keys_str_mv AT lagoalessandrafabiane effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT basilefilhoanibal effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT deoliveiraanamariasiriani effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT desouzahugocelsodutra effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT dossantosdanieleoliveira effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT gastaldiadaclarice effectsofphysicaltherapywithneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinacuteandlatesepticshockpatientsarandomisedcrossoverclinicaltrial