Cargando…
Evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella
Understanding the global burden of enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) and Shigella diarrhea as well as estimating the cost effectiveness of vaccines to control these two significant pathogens have been hindered by the lack of a diagnostic test that is rapid, simple, sensitive, and can be applied to the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010192 |
_version_ | 1784653273839435776 |
---|---|
author | Connor, Sean Velagic, Mirza Zhang, Xueyan Johura, Fatema-Tuz Chowdhury, Goutam Mukhopadhyay, Asish K. Dutta, Shanta Alam, Munirul Sack, David A. Wierzba, Thomas F. Chakraborty, Subhra |
author_facet | Connor, Sean Velagic, Mirza Zhang, Xueyan Johura, Fatema-Tuz Chowdhury, Goutam Mukhopadhyay, Asish K. Dutta, Shanta Alam, Munirul Sack, David A. Wierzba, Thomas F. Chakraborty, Subhra |
author_sort | Connor, Sean |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding the global burden of enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) and Shigella diarrhea as well as estimating the cost effectiveness of vaccines to control these two significant pathogens have been hindered by the lack of a diagnostic test that is rapid, simple, sensitive, and can be applied to the endemic countries. We previously developed a simple and rapid assay, Rapid Loop mediated isothermal amplification based Diagnostic Test (RLDT) for the detection of ETEC and Shigella spp. (Shigella). In this study, the RLDT assay was evaluated in comparison with quantitative PCR (qPCR), culture and conventional PCR for the detection of ETEC and Shigella. This validation was performed using previously collected stool samples from endemic countries, from the travelers to the endemic countries, as well as samples from a controlled human infection model study of ETEC. The performance of RLDT from dried stool spots was also validated. RLDT resulted in excellent sensitivity and specificity compared to qPCR (99% and 99.2% respectively) ranging from 92.3 to 100% for the individual toxin genes of ETEC and 100% for Shigella. Culture was less sensitive compared to RLDT. No significant differences were noted in the performance of RLDT using samples from various sources or stool samples from moderate to severe diarrhea or asymptomatic infections. RLDT performed equally well in detection of ETEC and Shigella from the dried stool samples on filter papers. This study established that RLDT is sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used as a simple and rapid diagnostic assay to detect ETEC and Shigella in endemic countries to determine disease burden of these pathogens in the national and subnational levels. This information will be important to guide public health and policy makers to prioritize resources for accelerating the development and introduction of effective preventative and/or treatment interventions against these enteric infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8853640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88536402022-02-18 Evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella Connor, Sean Velagic, Mirza Zhang, Xueyan Johura, Fatema-Tuz Chowdhury, Goutam Mukhopadhyay, Asish K. Dutta, Shanta Alam, Munirul Sack, David A. Wierzba, Thomas F. Chakraborty, Subhra PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article Understanding the global burden of enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) and Shigella diarrhea as well as estimating the cost effectiveness of vaccines to control these two significant pathogens have been hindered by the lack of a diagnostic test that is rapid, simple, sensitive, and can be applied to the endemic countries. We previously developed a simple and rapid assay, Rapid Loop mediated isothermal amplification based Diagnostic Test (RLDT) for the detection of ETEC and Shigella spp. (Shigella). In this study, the RLDT assay was evaluated in comparison with quantitative PCR (qPCR), culture and conventional PCR for the detection of ETEC and Shigella. This validation was performed using previously collected stool samples from endemic countries, from the travelers to the endemic countries, as well as samples from a controlled human infection model study of ETEC. The performance of RLDT from dried stool spots was also validated. RLDT resulted in excellent sensitivity and specificity compared to qPCR (99% and 99.2% respectively) ranging from 92.3 to 100% for the individual toxin genes of ETEC and 100% for Shigella. Culture was less sensitive compared to RLDT. No significant differences were noted in the performance of RLDT using samples from various sources or stool samples from moderate to severe diarrhea or asymptomatic infections. RLDT performed equally well in detection of ETEC and Shigella from the dried stool samples on filter papers. This study established that RLDT is sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used as a simple and rapid diagnostic assay to detect ETEC and Shigella in endemic countries to determine disease burden of these pathogens in the national and subnational levels. This information will be important to guide public health and policy makers to prioritize resources for accelerating the development and introduction of effective preventative and/or treatment interventions against these enteric infections. Public Library of Science 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8853640/ /pubmed/35130310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010192 Text en © 2022 Connor et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Connor, Sean Velagic, Mirza Zhang, Xueyan Johura, Fatema-Tuz Chowdhury, Goutam Mukhopadhyay, Asish K. Dutta, Shanta Alam, Munirul Sack, David A. Wierzba, Thomas F. Chakraborty, Subhra Evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella |
title | Evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella |
title_full | Evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella |
title_short | Evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella |
title_sort | evaluation of a simple, rapid and field-adapted diagnostic assay for enterotoxigenic e. coli and shigella |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT connorsean evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT velagicmirza evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT zhangxueyan evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT johurafatematuz evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT chowdhurygoutam evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT mukhopadhyayasishk evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT duttashanta evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT alammunirul evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT sackdavida evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT wierzbathomasf evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella AT chakrabortysubhra evaluationofasimplerapidandfieldadapteddiagnosticassayforenterotoxigenicecoliandshigella |