Cargando…

Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive, battery-powered drilling systems have become the preferred tool for obtaining representative samples from bone lesions. However, the heat generated during battery-powered bone drilling for bone biopsies has not yet been sufficiently investigated. Thermal necrosis can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niehues, Stefan M., Elezkurtaj, Sefer, Bresssem, Keno K., Hamm, Bernd, Erxleben, Christoph, Vahldiek, Janis, Adams, Lisa C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8854298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34462782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03890-w
_version_ 1784653418373054464
author Niehues, Stefan M.
Elezkurtaj, Sefer
Bresssem, Keno K.
Hamm, Bernd
Erxleben, Christoph
Vahldiek, Janis
Adams, Lisa C.
author_facet Niehues, Stefan M.
Elezkurtaj, Sefer
Bresssem, Keno K.
Hamm, Bernd
Erxleben, Christoph
Vahldiek, Janis
Adams, Lisa C.
author_sort Niehues, Stefan M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive, battery-powered drilling systems have become the preferred tool for obtaining representative samples from bone lesions. However, the heat generated during battery-powered bone drilling for bone biopsies has not yet been sufficiently investigated. Thermal necrosis can occur if the bone temperature exceeds a critical threshold for a certain period of time. PURPOSE: To investigate heat production as a function of femur temperature during and after battery-powered percutaneous bone drilling in a porcine in vivo model. METHODS: We performed 16 femur drillings in 13 domestic pigs with an average age of 22 weeks and an average body temperature of 39.7 °C, using a battery-powered drilling system and an intraosseous temperature monitoring device. The standardized duration of the drilling procedure was 20 s. The bone core specimens obtained were embedded in 4% formalin, stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and sent for pathological analysis of tissue quality and signs of thermal damage. RESULTS: No significant changes in the pigs’ local temperature were observed after bone drilling with a battery-powered drill device. Across all measurements, the median change in temperature between the initial measurement and the temperature measured after drilling (at 20 s) was 0.1 °C. Histological examination of the bone core specimens revealed no signs of mechanical or thermal damage. CONCLUSION: Overall, this preliminary study shows that battery-powered, drill-assisted harvesting of bone core specimens does not appear to cause mechanical or thermal damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8854298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88542982022-02-23 Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study Niehues, Stefan M. Elezkurtaj, Sefer Bresssem, Keno K. Hamm, Bernd Erxleben, Christoph Vahldiek, Janis Adams, Lisa C. Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive, battery-powered drilling systems have become the preferred tool for obtaining representative samples from bone lesions. However, the heat generated during battery-powered bone drilling for bone biopsies has not yet been sufficiently investigated. Thermal necrosis can occur if the bone temperature exceeds a critical threshold for a certain period of time. PURPOSE: To investigate heat production as a function of femur temperature during and after battery-powered percutaneous bone drilling in a porcine in vivo model. METHODS: We performed 16 femur drillings in 13 domestic pigs with an average age of 22 weeks and an average body temperature of 39.7 °C, using a battery-powered drilling system and an intraosseous temperature monitoring device. The standardized duration of the drilling procedure was 20 s. The bone core specimens obtained were embedded in 4% formalin, stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and sent for pathological analysis of tissue quality and signs of thermal damage. RESULTS: No significant changes in the pigs’ local temperature were observed after bone drilling with a battery-powered drill device. Across all measurements, the median change in temperature between the initial measurement and the temperature measured after drilling (at 20 s) was 0.1 °C. Histological examination of the bone core specimens revealed no signs of mechanical or thermal damage. CONCLUSION: Overall, this preliminary study shows that battery-powered, drill-assisted harvesting of bone core specimens does not appear to cause mechanical or thermal damage. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8854298/ /pubmed/34462782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03890-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Niehues, Stefan M.
Elezkurtaj, Sefer
Bresssem, Keno K.
Hamm, Bernd
Erxleben, Christoph
Vahldiek, Janis
Adams, Lisa C.
Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study
title Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study
title_full Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study
title_fullStr Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study
title_short Evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study
title_sort evaluation of potential tissue heating during percutaneous drill-assisted bone sampling in an in vivo porcine study
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8854298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34462782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03890-w
work_keys_str_mv AT niehuesstefanm evaluationofpotentialtissueheatingduringpercutaneousdrillassistedbonesamplinginaninvivoporcinestudy
AT elezkurtajsefer evaluationofpotentialtissueheatingduringpercutaneousdrillassistedbonesamplinginaninvivoporcinestudy
AT bresssemkenok evaluationofpotentialtissueheatingduringpercutaneousdrillassistedbonesamplinginaninvivoporcinestudy
AT hammbernd evaluationofpotentialtissueheatingduringpercutaneousdrillassistedbonesamplinginaninvivoporcinestudy
AT erxlebenchristoph evaluationofpotentialtissueheatingduringpercutaneousdrillassistedbonesamplinginaninvivoporcinestudy
AT vahldiekjanis evaluationofpotentialtissueheatingduringpercutaneousdrillassistedbonesamplinginaninvivoporcinestudy
AT adamslisac evaluationofpotentialtissueheatingduringpercutaneousdrillassistedbonesamplinginaninvivoporcinestudy