Cargando…

Study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient Egypt and the modern era

It is widely recognized that today people around the world still admire the Egyptian civilization and wonder how Egyptians came to manufacture mortar. The present work aims to study the construction materials that were used in ancient Egypt and their development over time. To do this, it was decided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaabane, Lynda Amel, Soualhi, Hamza, Matari, Nabil, Benmokhtar, Nelia, Bouayed, Nadia Sirine, Bendisari, Tedjeddine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855030/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09648-5
_version_ 1784653566417305600
author Chaabane, Lynda Amel
Soualhi, Hamza
Matari, Nabil
Benmokhtar, Nelia
Bouayed, Nadia Sirine
Bendisari, Tedjeddine
author_facet Chaabane, Lynda Amel
Soualhi, Hamza
Matari, Nabil
Benmokhtar, Nelia
Bouayed, Nadia Sirine
Bendisari, Tedjeddine
author_sort Chaabane, Lynda Amel
collection PubMed
description It is widely recognized that today people around the world still admire the Egyptian civilization and wonder how Egyptians came to manufacture mortar. The present work aims to study the construction materials that were used in ancient Egypt and their development over time. To do this, it was decided to first evaluate the physical and mechanical performances of the building materials used at that time and then try to investigate and understand the handling process as well as the construction methods adopted currently. For this, cement (NA442 CEM II/B-L 42.5 N) and local sand were replaced at different proportions with lime in the formulation of mortar, the sand used whose mixture was relative to that of the sand (0/4) and (0/1) values of 65% and 35%, respectively. A number of tests were carried out on two types of mortar prepared with two different formulations. The first formulation, which included quicklime, was subjected to a simple treatment in order to obtain aerial lime and to understand the different formulation stages that were followed in the Ancient Egyptian times. Knowing that the objective was to revive the method of manufacturing works from the ancient era, thus using a variable rate of substitution (0%, 50% to 70%) of lime, limestone and gypsum to obtain the binder by also studying the stakes of this variation on the reduction of the quantity of cement in the mortar which consisted in the preparation of fourteen test series in order to converge on the impact of the experiments sought. The second one consisted, at a later time, in preparing some series of mortar incorporating aerial lime brought from the manufacturing plant. After analyzing the prepared material, it was deemed interesting to attempt to quantitatively reconstruct the composition of the material using the Vicat test for the purpose of assessing the cement slurry setting process for stylolithic joints which, to the best of our knowledge, are very well developed only in limestones. Also noting that, the composition of the mortar and the rate of substitution evolved according to the results obtained upstream while keeping the objective of this research which was to reproduce a composition compatible with the old days.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8855030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88550302022-02-18 Study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient Egypt and the modern era Chaabane, Lynda Amel Soualhi, Hamza Matari, Nabil Benmokhtar, Nelia Bouayed, Nadia Sirine Bendisari, Tedjeddine Arab J Geosci Original Paper It is widely recognized that today people around the world still admire the Egyptian civilization and wonder how Egyptians came to manufacture mortar. The present work aims to study the construction materials that were used in ancient Egypt and their development over time. To do this, it was decided to first evaluate the physical and mechanical performances of the building materials used at that time and then try to investigate and understand the handling process as well as the construction methods adopted currently. For this, cement (NA442 CEM II/B-L 42.5 N) and local sand were replaced at different proportions with lime in the formulation of mortar, the sand used whose mixture was relative to that of the sand (0/4) and (0/1) values of 65% and 35%, respectively. A number of tests were carried out on two types of mortar prepared with two different formulations. The first formulation, which included quicklime, was subjected to a simple treatment in order to obtain aerial lime and to understand the different formulation stages that were followed in the Ancient Egyptian times. Knowing that the objective was to revive the method of manufacturing works from the ancient era, thus using a variable rate of substitution (0%, 50% to 70%) of lime, limestone and gypsum to obtain the binder by also studying the stakes of this variation on the reduction of the quantity of cement in the mortar which consisted in the preparation of fourteen test series in order to converge on the impact of the experiments sought. The second one consisted, at a later time, in preparing some series of mortar incorporating aerial lime brought from the manufacturing plant. After analyzing the prepared material, it was deemed interesting to attempt to quantitatively reconstruct the composition of the material using the Vicat test for the purpose of assessing the cement slurry setting process for stylolithic joints which, to the best of our knowledge, are very well developed only in limestones. Also noting that, the composition of the mortar and the rate of substitution evolved according to the results obtained upstream while keeping the objective of this research which was to reproduce a composition compatible with the old days. Springer International Publishing 2022-02-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8855030/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09648-5 Text en © Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Chaabane, Lynda Amel
Soualhi, Hamza
Matari, Nabil
Benmokhtar, Nelia
Bouayed, Nadia Sirine
Bendisari, Tedjeddine
Study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient Egypt and the modern era
title Study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient Egypt and the modern era
title_full Study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient Egypt and the modern era
title_fullStr Study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient Egypt and the modern era
title_full_unstemmed Study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient Egypt and the modern era
title_short Study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient Egypt and the modern era
title_sort study and comparative approach to materials used in ancient egypt and the modern era
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855030/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09648-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chaabanelyndaamel studyandcomparativeapproachtomaterialsusedinancientegyptandthemodernera
AT soualhihamza studyandcomparativeapproachtomaterialsusedinancientegyptandthemodernera
AT matarinabil studyandcomparativeapproachtomaterialsusedinancientegyptandthemodernera
AT benmokhtarnelia studyandcomparativeapproachtomaterialsusedinancientegyptandthemodernera
AT bouayednadiasirine studyandcomparativeapproachtomaterialsusedinancientegyptandthemodernera
AT bendisaritedjeddine studyandcomparativeapproachtomaterialsusedinancientegyptandthemodernera