Cargando…

Force Distribution Within Spinal Tissues During Posterior to Anterior Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Secondary Analysis

BACKGROUND: Previous studies observed that the intervertebral disc experiences the greatest forces during spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and that the distribution of forces among spinal tissues changes as a function of the SMT parameters. However, contextualized SMT forces, relative to the ones a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Funabashi, Martha, Breen, Alexander Cleveland, De Carvalho, Diana, Pagé, Isabelle, Nougarou, François, Descarreaux, Martin, Kawchuk, Gregory N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2021.809372
_version_ 1784653571488219136
author Funabashi, Martha
Breen, Alexander Cleveland
De Carvalho, Diana
Pagé, Isabelle
Nougarou, François
Descarreaux, Martin
Kawchuk, Gregory N.
author_facet Funabashi, Martha
Breen, Alexander Cleveland
De Carvalho, Diana
Pagé, Isabelle
Nougarou, François
Descarreaux, Martin
Kawchuk, Gregory N.
author_sort Funabashi, Martha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies observed that the intervertebral disc experiences the greatest forces during spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and that the distribution of forces among spinal tissues changes as a function of the SMT parameters. However, contextualized SMT forces, relative to the ones applied to and experienced by the whole functional spinal unit, is needed to understand SMT’s underlying mechanisms. AIM: To describe the percentage force distribution between spinal tissues relative to the applied SMT forces and total force experienced by the functional unit. METHODS: This secondary analysis combined data from 35 fresh porcine cadavers exposed to a simulated 300N SMT to the skin overlying the L3/L4 facet joint via servo-controlled linear motor actuator. Vertebral kinematics were tracked optically using indwelling bone pins. The functional spinal unit was then removed and mounted on a parallel robotic platform equipped with a 6-axis load cell. The kinematics of the spine during SMT were replayed by the robotic platform. By using serial dissection, peak and mean forces induced by the simulated SMT experienced by spinal structures in all three axes of motion were recorded. Forces experienced by spinal structures were analyzed descriptively and the resultant force magnitude was calculated. RESULTS: During SMT, the functional spinal unit experienced a median peak resultant force of 36.4N (IQR: 14.1N) and a mean resultant force of 25.4N (IQR: 11.9N). Peak resultant force experienced by the spinal segment corresponded to 12.1% of the total applied SMT force (300N). When the resultant force experienced by the functional spinal unit was considered to be 100%, the supra and interspinous ligaments experienced 0.3% of the peak forces and 0.5% of the mean forces. Facet joints and ligamentum flavum experienced 0.7% of the peak forces and 3% of the mean forces. Intervertebral disc and longitudinal ligaments experienced 99% of the peak and 96.5% of the mean forces. CONCLUSION: In this animal model, a small percentage of the forces applied during a posterior-to-anterior SMT reached spinal structures in the lumbar spine. Most SMT forces (over 96%) are experienced by the intervertebral disc. This study provides a novel perspective on SMT force distribution within spinal tissues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8855051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88550512022-02-19 Force Distribution Within Spinal Tissues During Posterior to Anterior Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Secondary Analysis Funabashi, Martha Breen, Alexander Cleveland De Carvalho, Diana Pagé, Isabelle Nougarou, François Descarreaux, Martin Kawchuk, Gregory N. Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Previous studies observed that the intervertebral disc experiences the greatest forces during spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and that the distribution of forces among spinal tissues changes as a function of the SMT parameters. However, contextualized SMT forces, relative to the ones applied to and experienced by the whole functional spinal unit, is needed to understand SMT’s underlying mechanisms. AIM: To describe the percentage force distribution between spinal tissues relative to the applied SMT forces and total force experienced by the functional unit. METHODS: This secondary analysis combined data from 35 fresh porcine cadavers exposed to a simulated 300N SMT to the skin overlying the L3/L4 facet joint via servo-controlled linear motor actuator. Vertebral kinematics were tracked optically using indwelling bone pins. The functional spinal unit was then removed and mounted on a parallel robotic platform equipped with a 6-axis load cell. The kinematics of the spine during SMT were replayed by the robotic platform. By using serial dissection, peak and mean forces induced by the simulated SMT experienced by spinal structures in all three axes of motion were recorded. Forces experienced by spinal structures were analyzed descriptively and the resultant force magnitude was calculated. RESULTS: During SMT, the functional spinal unit experienced a median peak resultant force of 36.4N (IQR: 14.1N) and a mean resultant force of 25.4N (IQR: 11.9N). Peak resultant force experienced by the spinal segment corresponded to 12.1% of the total applied SMT force (300N). When the resultant force experienced by the functional spinal unit was considered to be 100%, the supra and interspinous ligaments experienced 0.3% of the peak forces and 0.5% of the mean forces. Facet joints and ligamentum flavum experienced 0.7% of the peak forces and 3% of the mean forces. Intervertebral disc and longitudinal ligaments experienced 99% of the peak and 96.5% of the mean forces. CONCLUSION: In this animal model, a small percentage of the forces applied during a posterior-to-anterior SMT reached spinal structures in the lumbar spine. Most SMT forces (over 96%) are experienced by the intervertebral disc. This study provides a novel perspective on SMT force distribution within spinal tissues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8855051/ /pubmed/35185486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2021.809372 Text en Copyright © 2022 Funabashi, Breen, De Carvalho, Pagé, Nougarou, Descarreaux and Kawchuk. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Funabashi, Martha
Breen, Alexander Cleveland
De Carvalho, Diana
Pagé, Isabelle
Nougarou, François
Descarreaux, Martin
Kawchuk, Gregory N.
Force Distribution Within Spinal Tissues During Posterior to Anterior Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Secondary Analysis
title Force Distribution Within Spinal Tissues During Posterior to Anterior Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Secondary Analysis
title_full Force Distribution Within Spinal Tissues During Posterior to Anterior Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Secondary Analysis
title_fullStr Force Distribution Within Spinal Tissues During Posterior to Anterior Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Secondary Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Force Distribution Within Spinal Tissues During Posterior to Anterior Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Secondary Analysis
title_short Force Distribution Within Spinal Tissues During Posterior to Anterior Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Secondary Analysis
title_sort force distribution within spinal tissues during posterior to anterior spinal manipulative therapy: a secondary analysis
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185486
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2021.809372
work_keys_str_mv AT funabashimartha forcedistributionwithinspinaltissuesduringposteriortoanteriorspinalmanipulativetherapyasecondaryanalysis
AT breenalexandercleveland forcedistributionwithinspinaltissuesduringposteriortoanteriorspinalmanipulativetherapyasecondaryanalysis
AT decarvalhodiana forcedistributionwithinspinaltissuesduringposteriortoanteriorspinalmanipulativetherapyasecondaryanalysis
AT pageisabelle forcedistributionwithinspinaltissuesduringposteriortoanteriorspinalmanipulativetherapyasecondaryanalysis
AT nougaroufrancois forcedistributionwithinspinaltissuesduringposteriortoanteriorspinalmanipulativetherapyasecondaryanalysis
AT descarreauxmartin forcedistributionwithinspinaltissuesduringposteriortoanteriorspinalmanipulativetherapyasecondaryanalysis
AT kawchukgregoryn forcedistributionwithinspinaltissuesduringposteriortoanteriorspinalmanipulativetherapyasecondaryanalysis