Cargando…

Submucosal protuberance caused by a fish bone in the absence of preoperative positive signs: A case report

BACKGROUND: Submucosal protuberance caused by fish bone insertion into the digestive tract has rarely been reported. These cases usually include patients with clear signs such as a history of fish intake, pain, and dysphagia, as well as positive findings on endoscopy and imaging. Here, we report a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Wei-Wei, Huang, Tao, Yang, Guo-Dong, Zhang, Jing, Chen, Jing, Wang, Ying-Bang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211596
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1586
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Submucosal protuberance caused by fish bone insertion into the digestive tract has rarely been reported. These cases usually include patients with clear signs such as a history of fish intake, pain, and dysphagia, as well as positive findings on endoscopy and imaging. Here, we report a case of a fish bone hidden in the submucosal protuberance of the gastric antrum during endoscopic submucosal dissection without preoperative obvious positive signs. CASE SUMMARY: A 58-year-old woman presented with epigastric pain for the past 20 d and a submucosal protuberance. Abdominal computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography did not indicate the presence of a fish bone. We assumed the cause to be an ordinary submucosal eminence and performed an endoscopic submucosal dissection to confirm its essence. During the operation, a fish bone approximately 20 mm in length was found incidentally. CONCLUSION: Our report could potentially prevent the oversight of embedded fish bones and associated adverse effects in patients with similar presentation.