Screening of psychiatric disorders in women with high‐risk pregnancy: Accuracy of three psychological tools

PURPOSE: This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high‐risk pregnancy. DESIGN AND METHODS: In this cross‐sectional study (N = 155), sensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamidia, Angela, Kheirkhah, Farzan, Chehrazi, Mohammad, Basirat, Zahra, Ghadimi, Reza, Barat, Shahnaz, Cuijpers, Pim, O'Connor, Elizabeth, Mirtabar, Seyyedeh Mahboubeh, Faramarzi, Mahbobeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Original Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.518
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high‐risk pregnancy. DESIGN AND METHODS: In this cross‐sectional study (N = 155), sensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Brief Symptom Inventory 53‐items (BSI‐53), and the BSI‐18 were computed with respect to having a psychiatric diagnosis based on the clinical interview. RESULTS: The usual cutoffs (≥13 for EPDS, T‐score of 63 for BSI‐53) demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy. The optimal thresholds were computed for EPDS cutoff of 6.5, GSI = 0.47 for BSI‐53, and GSI = 0.5 for BSI‐18. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The use of psychological tools among pregnant women with high‐risk pregnancy may need to be modified in order to accurately identify psychiatric disorders.

Ejemplares similares