Cargando…

Bridging troubled water ‐ exploring improvement and patients' experiences using patient‐reported outcome measures in physiotherapy: A mixed‐method study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increased use of patient‐reported outcomes in health care has been emphasized. Our aim was to use the Patient‐Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) to examine improvement in neck pain patients' activity limitations during physiotherapy treatment, with the purpose to explore the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjorbækmo, Wenche Schrøder, Mengshoel, Anne Marit, Robinson, Hilde Stendal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.530
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increased use of patient‐reported outcomes in health care has been emphasized. Our aim was to use the Patient‐Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) to examine improvement in neck pain patients' activity limitations during physiotherapy treatment, with the purpose to explore the patients' experiences of using PSFS. The study illuminates whether and how PSFS can be useful in clinical physiotherapy. METHODS: Six patients participated. A mixed‐method study design was applied, triangulating ontological perspectives of realism and phenomenology, quantitative and qualitative methods. Single Subject Experimental Design with PSFS as outcome measure examined changes over time and phenomenological interviews examined its meaningfulness for patients. Patients defined their personal activity limitations due to neck pain and scored difficulties several times, during the physiotherapy treatment period, using PSFS. We used visual analyses of the quantitative data and thematic analyses of the qualitative data. Integration and combination of the results from the two designs are presented in the discussion. RESULTS: In the quantitative analyses, PSFS showed improvement in most activity limitations during treatment. The qualitative analyses revealed that using PSFS required the patient to engage in different bodily awareness processes and handle the dilemma of a possible double function of scoring chosen activities. The mixed findings revealed improved functionality and that the context and the interaction between patient and therapist have a significant influence on the assessment process. CONCLUSIONS: To be able to improve the utilization of PSFS, communication between patients and physiotherapists is of vital importance. When using PSFS, physiotherapists should direct their attention to the importance of interaction as always present and vital in assessments.