Cargando…

Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era

PURPOSE: We aimed to develop and prospectively validate a risk score model to guide individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 1220 patients who received...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Shan‐Shan, Pang, Ya‐Jun, Wang, Zhi‐Qiang, Zhang, Bao‐Yu, Liu, Zhi‐Qiao, Chen, En‐Ni, OuYang, Pu‐Yun, Xie, Fang‐Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4520
_version_ 1784653735685783552
author Yang, Shan‐Shan
Pang, Ya‐Jun
Wang, Zhi‐Qiang
Zhang, Bao‐Yu
Liu, Zhi‐Qiao
Chen, En‐Ni
OuYang, Pu‐Yun
Xie, Fang‐Yun
author_facet Yang, Shan‐Shan
Pang, Ya‐Jun
Wang, Zhi‐Qiang
Zhang, Bao‐Yu
Liu, Zhi‐Qiao
Chen, En‐Ni
OuYang, Pu‐Yun
Xie, Fang‐Yun
author_sort Yang, Shan‐Shan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We aimed to develop and prospectively validate a risk score model to guide individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 1220 patients who received CCRT or IMRT alone were enrolled in this study, including a training cohort (n = 719), a validation cohort (n = 307), and a prospective test cohort (n = 194). Patients were stratified into different risk groups by a risk score model based on independent prognostic factors, which were developed in the training cohort. Survival rates were compared by the log‐rank test. The validation and prospective test cohorts were used for validation. RESULTS: Total tumor volume, Epstein–Barr virus DNA, and lactate dehydrogenase were independent risk factors for failure‐free survival (FFS, all p < 0.05). A risk score model based on these three risk factors was developed to classify patients into low‐risk group (no risk factor, n = 337) and high‐risk group (one or more factors, n = 382) in the training cohort. In the high‐risk group, CCRT had better survival rates than IMRT alone (5‐year FFS: 82.6% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.028). However, there was no survival difference between CCRT and IMRT alone either in the whole training cohort (p = 0.15) or in the low‐risk group (p = 0.15). The results were verified in the validation and prospective test cohorts. CONCLUSION: A risk score model was developed and prospectively validated to precisely select high‐risk stage II NPC patients who can benefit from CCRT, and thus guided individualized treatment in IMRT era.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8855903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88559032022-02-25 Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era Yang, Shan‐Shan Pang, Ya‐Jun Wang, Zhi‐Qiang Zhang, Bao‐Yu Liu, Zhi‐Qiao Chen, En‐Ni OuYang, Pu‐Yun Xie, Fang‐Yun Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research PURPOSE: We aimed to develop and prospectively validate a risk score model to guide individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 1220 patients who received CCRT or IMRT alone were enrolled in this study, including a training cohort (n = 719), a validation cohort (n = 307), and a prospective test cohort (n = 194). Patients were stratified into different risk groups by a risk score model based on independent prognostic factors, which were developed in the training cohort. Survival rates were compared by the log‐rank test. The validation and prospective test cohorts were used for validation. RESULTS: Total tumor volume, Epstein–Barr virus DNA, and lactate dehydrogenase were independent risk factors for failure‐free survival (FFS, all p < 0.05). A risk score model based on these three risk factors was developed to classify patients into low‐risk group (no risk factor, n = 337) and high‐risk group (one or more factors, n = 382) in the training cohort. In the high‐risk group, CCRT had better survival rates than IMRT alone (5‐year FFS: 82.6% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.028). However, there was no survival difference between CCRT and IMRT alone either in the whole training cohort (p = 0.15) or in the low‐risk group (p = 0.15). The results were verified in the validation and prospective test cohorts. CONCLUSION: A risk score model was developed and prospectively validated to precisely select high‐risk stage II NPC patients who can benefit from CCRT, and thus guided individualized treatment in IMRT era. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8855903/ /pubmed/34953045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4520 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Yang, Shan‐Shan
Pang, Ya‐Jun
Wang, Zhi‐Qiang
Zhang, Bao‐Yu
Liu, Zhi‐Qiao
Chen, En‐Ni
OuYang, Pu‐Yun
Xie, Fang‐Yun
Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era
title Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era
title_full Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era
title_fullStr Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era
title_full_unstemmed Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era
title_short Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era
title_sort development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage ii nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy era
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4520
work_keys_str_mv AT yangshanshan developmentandprospectivevalidationofariskscoremodelinguidingindividualizedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyinstageiinasopharyngealcarcinomainintensitymodulatedradiotherapyera
AT pangyajun developmentandprospectivevalidationofariskscoremodelinguidingindividualizedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyinstageiinasopharyngealcarcinomainintensitymodulatedradiotherapyera
AT wangzhiqiang developmentandprospectivevalidationofariskscoremodelinguidingindividualizedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyinstageiinasopharyngealcarcinomainintensitymodulatedradiotherapyera
AT zhangbaoyu developmentandprospectivevalidationofariskscoremodelinguidingindividualizedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyinstageiinasopharyngealcarcinomainintensitymodulatedradiotherapyera
AT liuzhiqiao developmentandprospectivevalidationofariskscoremodelinguidingindividualizedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyinstageiinasopharyngealcarcinomainintensitymodulatedradiotherapyera
AT chenenni developmentandprospectivevalidationofariskscoremodelinguidingindividualizedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyinstageiinasopharyngealcarcinomainintensitymodulatedradiotherapyera
AT ouyangpuyun developmentandprospectivevalidationofariskscoremodelinguidingindividualizedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyinstageiinasopharyngealcarcinomainintensitymodulatedradiotherapyera
AT xiefangyun developmentandprospectivevalidationofariskscoremodelinguidingindividualizedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyinstageiinasopharyngealcarcinomainintensitymodulatedradiotherapyera