Cargando…

Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?*

To evaluate whether the recommended observation period of 7 days for cardiac arrest survivors is sufficient for conscious recovery and to identify the variables associated with eventual neurologic recovery among patients with delayed awakening. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Min-Shan, Chen, Wen-Jone, Chen, Wei-Ting, Tien, Yu-Tzu, Chang, Wei-Tien, Ong, Hooi-Nee, Huang, Chien-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005264
_version_ 1784653743997845504
author Tsai, Min-Shan
Chen, Wen-Jone
Chen, Wei-Ting
Tien, Yu-Tzu
Chang, Wei-Tien
Ong, Hooi-Nee
Huang, Chien-Hua
author_facet Tsai, Min-Shan
Chen, Wen-Jone
Chen, Wei-Ting
Tien, Yu-Tzu
Chang, Wei-Tien
Ong, Hooi-Nee
Huang, Chien-Hua
author_sort Tsai, Min-Shan
collection PubMed
description To evaluate whether the recommended observation period of 7 days for cardiac arrest survivors is sufficient for conscious recovery and to identify the variables associated with eventual neurologic recovery among patients with delayed awakening. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Five-hundred twenty-nine nontraumatic adult cardiac arrest survivors with prearrest favorable neurologic function (Cerebral Performance Category 1–2) who survived to hospital discharge during 2011–2019. INTERVENTIONS: The enrolled patients were classified into favorable (Cerebral Performance Category 1–2) and poor (Cerebral Performance Category 3–4) neurologic recovery according to their neurologic function at hospital discharge. Among patients with favorable neurologic recovery, those who recovered within 7 days were assigned to the early recovery group or after 7 days as the late recovery group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 395 patients exhibiting favorable neurologic recovery (n = 357 in the early group, n = 38 in late group) and 134 patients exhibiting poor neurologic recovery (poor recovery group). Among patients who remained unconscious on day 7, delayed awakening was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.905; 95% CI, 1.153–13.221), prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (OR, 7.628; 95% CI, 2.084–27.922), therapeutic hypothermia (OR, 4.320; 95% CI, 1.624–11.488), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR, 4.508; 95% CI, 1.414–14.371). Being transferred from another hospital, however, was less likely to be associated with delayed awakening (OR, 0.061; 95% CI, 0.009–0.431). The median duration for patients to regain clear consciousness in the late recovery group was 12.12 days. No patient who recovered consciousness had an unfavorable electroencephalography pattern, however, in patients with poor recovery, the 7-day electroencephalography showed 45 patients with generalized suppression (33.6%), two with burst suppression (1.5%), 14 with seizure/epileptic discharge (10.5%), and one with status epilepticus (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Up to 9.6% of cardiac arrest patients with favorable outcomes recover consciousness after the recommended 7 days of observation, indicating the observation time of 7 days seems justified but longer duration may be needed. The results of the culturally and clinically isolated population may limit the application to other population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8855944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88559442022-02-24 Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?* Tsai, Min-Shan Chen, Wen-Jone Chen, Wei-Ting Tien, Yu-Tzu Chang, Wei-Tien Ong, Hooi-Nee Huang, Chien-Hua Crit Care Med Feature Articles To evaluate whether the recommended observation period of 7 days for cardiac arrest survivors is sufficient for conscious recovery and to identify the variables associated with eventual neurologic recovery among patients with delayed awakening. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Five-hundred twenty-nine nontraumatic adult cardiac arrest survivors with prearrest favorable neurologic function (Cerebral Performance Category 1–2) who survived to hospital discharge during 2011–2019. INTERVENTIONS: The enrolled patients were classified into favorable (Cerebral Performance Category 1–2) and poor (Cerebral Performance Category 3–4) neurologic recovery according to their neurologic function at hospital discharge. Among patients with favorable neurologic recovery, those who recovered within 7 days were assigned to the early recovery group or after 7 days as the late recovery group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 395 patients exhibiting favorable neurologic recovery (n = 357 in the early group, n = 38 in late group) and 134 patients exhibiting poor neurologic recovery (poor recovery group). Among patients who remained unconscious on day 7, delayed awakening was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.905; 95% CI, 1.153–13.221), prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (OR, 7.628; 95% CI, 2.084–27.922), therapeutic hypothermia (OR, 4.320; 95% CI, 1.624–11.488), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR, 4.508; 95% CI, 1.414–14.371). Being transferred from another hospital, however, was less likely to be associated with delayed awakening (OR, 0.061; 95% CI, 0.009–0.431). The median duration for patients to regain clear consciousness in the late recovery group was 12.12 days. No patient who recovered consciousness had an unfavorable electroencephalography pattern, however, in patients with poor recovery, the 7-day electroencephalography showed 45 patients with generalized suppression (33.6%), two with burst suppression (1.5%), 14 with seizure/epileptic discharge (10.5%), and one with status epilepticus (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Up to 9.6% of cardiac arrest patients with favorable outcomes recover consciousness after the recommended 7 days of observation, indicating the observation time of 7 days seems justified but longer duration may be needed. The results of the culturally and clinically isolated population may limit the application to other population. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-04 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8855944/ /pubmed/34342303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005264 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Feature Articles
Tsai, Min-Shan
Chen, Wen-Jone
Chen, Wei-Ting
Tien, Yu-Tzu
Chang, Wei-Tien
Ong, Hooi-Nee
Huang, Chien-Hua
Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?*
title Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?*
title_full Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?*
title_fullStr Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?*
title_full_unstemmed Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?*
title_short Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?*
title_sort should we prolong the observation period for neurological recovery after cardiac arrest?*
topic Feature Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005264
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaiminshan shouldweprolongtheobservationperiodforneurologicalrecoveryaftercardiacarrest
AT chenwenjone shouldweprolongtheobservationperiodforneurologicalrecoveryaftercardiacarrest
AT chenweiting shouldweprolongtheobservationperiodforneurologicalrecoveryaftercardiacarrest
AT tienyutzu shouldweprolongtheobservationperiodforneurologicalrecoveryaftercardiacarrest
AT changweitien shouldweprolongtheobservationperiodforneurologicalrecoveryaftercardiacarrest
AT onghooinee shouldweprolongtheobservationperiodforneurologicalrecoveryaftercardiacarrest
AT huangchienhua shouldweprolongtheobservationperiodforneurologicalrecoveryaftercardiacarrest