Cargando…

Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukarcanin, Jusuf, Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat, Yaşa, Bilal, Türkün, Lezize Şebnem, Türkün, Murat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8856822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825
_version_ 1784653923863232512
author Lukarcanin, Jusuf
Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat
Yaşa, Bilal
Türkün, Lezize Şebnem
Türkün, Murat
author_facet Lukarcanin, Jusuf
Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat
Yaşa, Bilal
Türkün, Lezize Şebnem
Türkün, Murat
author_sort Lukarcanin, Jusuf
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa (p < 0.05). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8856822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88568222022-02-19 Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth Lukarcanin, Jusuf Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat Yaşa, Bilal Türkün, Lezize Şebnem Türkün, Murat Int J Biomater Research Article The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa (p < 0.05). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT. Hindawi 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8856822/ /pubmed/35186088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jusuf Lukarcanin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lukarcanin, Jusuf
Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat
Yaşa, Bilal
Türkün, Lezize Şebnem
Türkün, Murat
Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
title Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_full Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_short Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_sort comparison of different restoration techniques for endodontically treated teeth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8856822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825
work_keys_str_mv AT lukarcaninjusuf comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT sadıkogluismailserhat comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT yasabilal comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT turkunlezizesebnem comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT turkunmurat comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth