Cargando…
Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8856822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825 |
_version_ | 1784653923863232512 |
---|---|
author | Lukarcanin, Jusuf Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat Yaşa, Bilal Türkün, Lezize Şebnem Türkün, Murat |
author_facet | Lukarcanin, Jusuf Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat Yaşa, Bilal Türkün, Lezize Şebnem Türkün, Murat |
author_sort | Lukarcanin, Jusuf |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa (p < 0.05). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8856822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88568222022-02-19 Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth Lukarcanin, Jusuf Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat Yaşa, Bilal Türkün, Lezize Şebnem Türkün, Murat Int J Biomater Research Article The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa (p < 0.05). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT. Hindawi 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8856822/ /pubmed/35186088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jusuf Lukarcanin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lukarcanin, Jusuf Sadıkoğlu, İsmail Serhat Yaşa, Bilal Türkün, Lezize Şebnem Türkün, Murat Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_full | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_short | Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_sort | comparison of different restoration techniques for endodontically treated teeth |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8856822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6643825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lukarcaninjusuf comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth AT sadıkogluismailserhat comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth AT yasabilal comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth AT turkunlezizesebnem comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth AT turkunmurat comparisonofdifferentrestorationtechniquesforendodonticallytreatedteeth |