Management and Outcomes of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis at a Tertiary Healthcare Facility

RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in the final study. Cyclophosphamide was used in 24 patients (66.7%) and, comparatively, rituximab in 7 patients (19.4%) for induction. Seven patients (19.4%) had a documented relapse, and six patients (85.7%) had rituximab as induction therapy for relapse. The majority of patients were on azathioprine (61.1%, 57.1% relapse population) as maintenance therapy. Progression to ESRD occurred in 11 (30.6%), death in 4 (11.1%), established CKD in 15 (41.7%), and preservation of renal function in 6 (16.7%) patients by the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: While cyclophosphamide remains the choice of induction immunosuppression therapy, we favour rituximab as an induction agent in the relapse of AAV. Despite aggressive immunosuppression therapy, the incidence of ESRD and death remains high in these patients.