Cargando…
How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis
BACKGROUND: Malawi is one of a handful of countries that had resisted the implementation of user fees, showing a commitment to providing free healthcare to its population even before the concept of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) acquired global popularity. Several evaluations have investigated the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8856874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35180861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01624-5 |
_version_ | 1784653934793588736 |
---|---|
author | Rudasingwa, Martin Yeboah, Edmund Ridde, Valéry Bonnet, Emmanuel De Allegri, Manuela Muula, Adamson Sinjani |
author_facet | Rudasingwa, Martin Yeboah, Edmund Ridde, Valéry Bonnet, Emmanuel De Allegri, Manuela Muula, Adamson Sinjani |
author_sort | Rudasingwa, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Malawi is one of a handful of countries that had resisted the implementation of user fees, showing a commitment to providing free healthcare to its population even before the concept of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) acquired global popularity. Several evaluations have investigated the effects of key policies, such as the essential health package or performance-based financing, in sustaining and expanding access to quality health services in the country. Understanding the distributional impact of health spending over time due to these policies has received limited attention. Our study fills this knowledge gap by assessing the distributional incidence of public and overall health spending between 2004 and 2016. METHODS: We relied on a Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) to measure the socioeconomic inequality of public and overall health spending on curative services and institutional delivery across different health facility typologies. We used data from household surveys and National Health Accounts. We used a concentration index (CI) to determine the health benefits accrued by each socioeconomic group. RESULTS: Socioeconomic inequality in both public and overall health spending substantially decreased over time, with higher inequality observed in overall spending, non-public health facilities, curative health services, and at higher levels of care. Between 2004 and 2016, the inequality in public spending on curative services decreased from a CI of 0.037 (SE 0.013) to a CI of 0.004 (SE 0.011). Whiles, it decreased from a CI of 0.084 (SE 0.014) to a CI of 0.068 (SE 0.015) for overall spending in the same period. For institutional delivery, inequality in public and overall spending decreased between 2004 and 2016 from a CI of 0.032 (SE 0.028) to a CI of -0.057 (SE 0.014) and from a CI of 0.036 (SE 0.022) to a CI of 0.028 (SE 0.018), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Through its free healthcare policy, Malawi has reduced socioeconomic inequality in health spending over time, but some challenges still need to be addressed to achieve a truly egalitarian health system. Our findings indicate a need to increase public funding for the health sector to ensure access to care and financial protection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-022-01624-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8856874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88568742022-02-22 How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis Rudasingwa, Martin Yeboah, Edmund Ridde, Valéry Bonnet, Emmanuel De Allegri, Manuela Muula, Adamson Sinjani Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Malawi is one of a handful of countries that had resisted the implementation of user fees, showing a commitment to providing free healthcare to its population even before the concept of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) acquired global popularity. Several evaluations have investigated the effects of key policies, such as the essential health package or performance-based financing, in sustaining and expanding access to quality health services in the country. Understanding the distributional impact of health spending over time due to these policies has received limited attention. Our study fills this knowledge gap by assessing the distributional incidence of public and overall health spending between 2004 and 2016. METHODS: We relied on a Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) to measure the socioeconomic inequality of public and overall health spending on curative services and institutional delivery across different health facility typologies. We used data from household surveys and National Health Accounts. We used a concentration index (CI) to determine the health benefits accrued by each socioeconomic group. RESULTS: Socioeconomic inequality in both public and overall health spending substantially decreased over time, with higher inequality observed in overall spending, non-public health facilities, curative health services, and at higher levels of care. Between 2004 and 2016, the inequality in public spending on curative services decreased from a CI of 0.037 (SE 0.013) to a CI of 0.004 (SE 0.011). Whiles, it decreased from a CI of 0.084 (SE 0.014) to a CI of 0.068 (SE 0.015) for overall spending in the same period. For institutional delivery, inequality in public and overall spending decreased between 2004 and 2016 from a CI of 0.032 (SE 0.028) to a CI of -0.057 (SE 0.014) and from a CI of 0.036 (SE 0.022) to a CI of 0.028 (SE 0.018), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Through its free healthcare policy, Malawi has reduced socioeconomic inequality in health spending over time, but some challenges still need to be addressed to achieve a truly egalitarian health system. Our findings indicate a need to increase public funding for the health sector to ensure access to care and financial protection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-022-01624-5. BioMed Central 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8856874/ /pubmed/35180861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01624-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Rudasingwa, Martin Yeboah, Edmund Ridde, Valéry Bonnet, Emmanuel De Allegri, Manuela Muula, Adamson Sinjani How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis |
title | How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis |
title_full | How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis |
title_fullStr | How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis |
title_short | How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis |
title_sort | how equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in malawi? evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8856874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35180861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01624-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudasingwamartin howequitableishealthspendingoncurativeservicesandinstitutionaldeliveryinmalawievidencefromaquasilongitudinalbenefitincidenceanalysis AT yeboahedmund howequitableishealthspendingoncurativeservicesandinstitutionaldeliveryinmalawievidencefromaquasilongitudinalbenefitincidenceanalysis AT riddevalery howequitableishealthspendingoncurativeservicesandinstitutionaldeliveryinmalawievidencefromaquasilongitudinalbenefitincidenceanalysis AT bonnetemmanuel howequitableishealthspendingoncurativeservicesandinstitutionaldeliveryinmalawievidencefromaquasilongitudinalbenefitincidenceanalysis AT deallegrimanuela howequitableishealthspendingoncurativeservicesandinstitutionaldeliveryinmalawievidencefromaquasilongitudinalbenefitincidenceanalysis AT muulaadamsonsinjani howequitableishealthspendingoncurativeservicesandinstitutionaldeliveryinmalawievidencefromaquasilongitudinalbenefitincidenceanalysis |