Cargando…

Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry

BACKGROUND: Radiation dose metrics vary by the calibration reference phantom used to report doses. By convention, 16-cm diameter cylindrical polymethyl-methacyrlate phantoms are used for head imaging and 32-cm diameter phantoms are used for body imaging in adults. Actual usage patterns in children r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chu, Philip W., Yu, Sophronia, Wang, Yifei, Seibert, J. Anthony, Cervantes, Luisa F., Kasraie, Nima, Chu, Cameron A., Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05227-0
_version_ 1784653985861337088
author Chu, Philip W.
Yu, Sophronia
Wang, Yifei
Seibert, J. Anthony
Cervantes, Luisa F.
Kasraie, Nima
Chu, Cameron A.
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
author_facet Chu, Philip W.
Yu, Sophronia
Wang, Yifei
Seibert, J. Anthony
Cervantes, Luisa F.
Kasraie, Nima
Chu, Cameron A.
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
author_sort Chu, Philip W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiation dose metrics vary by the calibration reference phantom used to report doses. By convention, 16-cm diameter cylindrical polymethyl-methacyrlate phantoms are used for head imaging and 32-cm diameter phantoms are used for body imaging in adults. Actual usage patterns in children remain under-documented. OBJECTIVE: This study uses the University of California San Francisco International CT Dose Registry to describe phantom selection in children by patient age, body region and scanner manufacturer, and the consequent impact on radiation doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 106,837 pediatric computed tomography (CT) exams collected between Jan. 1, 2015, and Nov. 2, 2020, in children up to 17 years of age from 118 hospitals and imaging facilities, we describe reference phantom use patterns by body region, age and manufacturer, and median and 75th-percentile dose–length product (DLP) and volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) doses when using 16-cm vs. 32-cm phantoms. RESULTS: There was relatively consistent phantom selection by body region. Overall, 98.0% of brain and skull examinations referenced 16-cm phantoms, and 95.7% of chest, 94.4% of abdomen and 100% of cervical-spine examinations referenced 32-cm phantoms. Only GE deviated from this practice, reporting chest and abdomen scans using 16-cm phantoms with some frequency in children up to 10 years of age. DLP and CTDI(vol) values from 16-cm phantom-referenced scans were 2–3 times higher than 32-cm phantom-referenced scans. CONCLUSION: REFERENCE PHANTOM SELECTION IS HIGHLY CONSISTENT, WITH A SMALL BUT SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF ABDOMEN AND CHEST SCANS (~5%) USING 16-CM PHANTOMS IN YOUNGER CHILDREN, WHICH PRODUCES DLP VALUES APPROXIMATELY TWICE AS HIGH AS EXAMS REFERENCED TO 32-CM PHANTOMS: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00247-021-05227-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8857172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88571722022-02-23 Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry Chu, Philip W. Yu, Sophronia Wang, Yifei Seibert, J. Anthony Cervantes, Luisa F. Kasraie, Nima Chu, Cameron A. Smith-Bindman, Rebecca Pediatr Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Radiation dose metrics vary by the calibration reference phantom used to report doses. By convention, 16-cm diameter cylindrical polymethyl-methacyrlate phantoms are used for head imaging and 32-cm diameter phantoms are used for body imaging in adults. Actual usage patterns in children remain under-documented. OBJECTIVE: This study uses the University of California San Francisco International CT Dose Registry to describe phantom selection in children by patient age, body region and scanner manufacturer, and the consequent impact on radiation doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 106,837 pediatric computed tomography (CT) exams collected between Jan. 1, 2015, and Nov. 2, 2020, in children up to 17 years of age from 118 hospitals and imaging facilities, we describe reference phantom use patterns by body region, age and manufacturer, and median and 75th-percentile dose–length product (DLP) and volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) doses when using 16-cm vs. 32-cm phantoms. RESULTS: There was relatively consistent phantom selection by body region. Overall, 98.0% of brain and skull examinations referenced 16-cm phantoms, and 95.7% of chest, 94.4% of abdomen and 100% of cervical-spine examinations referenced 32-cm phantoms. Only GE deviated from this practice, reporting chest and abdomen scans using 16-cm phantoms with some frequency in children up to 10 years of age. DLP and CTDI(vol) values from 16-cm phantom-referenced scans were 2–3 times higher than 32-cm phantom-referenced scans. CONCLUSION: REFERENCE PHANTOM SELECTION IS HIGHLY CONSISTENT, WITH A SMALL BUT SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF ABDOMEN AND CHEST SCANS (~5%) USING 16-CM PHANTOMS IN YOUNGER CHILDREN, WHICH PRODUCES DLP VALUES APPROXIMATELY TWICE AS HIGH AS EXAMS REFERENCED TO 32-CM PHANTOMS: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00247-021-05227-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8857172/ /pubmed/34866159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05227-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Chu, Philip W.
Yu, Sophronia
Wang, Yifei
Seibert, J. Anthony
Cervantes, Luisa F.
Kasraie, Nima
Chu, Cameron A.
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry
title Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry
title_full Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry
title_fullStr Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry
title_full_unstemmed Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry
title_short Reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry
title_sort reference phantom selection in pediatric computed tomography using data from a large, multicenter registry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05227-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chuphilipw referencephantomselectioninpediatriccomputedtomographyusingdatafromalargemulticenterregistry
AT yusophronia referencephantomselectioninpediatriccomputedtomographyusingdatafromalargemulticenterregistry
AT wangyifei referencephantomselectioninpediatriccomputedtomographyusingdatafromalargemulticenterregistry
AT seibertjanthony referencephantomselectioninpediatriccomputedtomographyusingdatafromalargemulticenterregistry
AT cervantesluisaf referencephantomselectioninpediatriccomputedtomographyusingdatafromalargemulticenterregistry
AT kasraienima referencephantomselectioninpediatriccomputedtomographyusingdatafromalargemulticenterregistry
AT chucamerona referencephantomselectioninpediatriccomputedtomographyusingdatafromalargemulticenterregistry
AT smithbindmanrebecca referencephantomselectioninpediatriccomputedtomographyusingdatafromalargemulticenterregistry