Cargando…
Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols
Studies on genetic diversity, adaptive potential and fitness of species have become a major tool in conservation biology. These studies require biological material containing a reliable source of DNA which can be extracted and analysed. Recently, non-invasive sampling has become the preferred sampli...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06889-y |
_version_ | 1784654001422204928 |
---|---|
author | Shuttleworth, Loraine Oosthuizen, Carel Jakobus |
author_facet | Shuttleworth, Loraine Oosthuizen, Carel Jakobus |
author_sort | Shuttleworth, Loraine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Studies on genetic diversity, adaptive potential and fitness of species have become a major tool in conservation biology. These studies require biological material containing a reliable source of DNA which can be extracted and analysed. Recently, non-invasive sampling has become the preferred sampling method of such biological material; particularly when studying endangered species. Elasmoid scales from teleost fish are an example of non-invasive samples from which DNA can successfully be extracted. This study compared different extraction protocols to find an optimal method for extracting DNA from teleost fish scales. This was done with the intent to use the protocol that yielded the highest quantity of DNA on dried, archived scales. The protocols tested in this study included (1) phenol/chloroform with a TNES-urea digestion buffer, (2) phenol/chloroform with an amniocyte digestion buffer and (3) Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit with variations in incubation times and temperatures of each protocol. While the phenol/chloroform with TNES-urea digestion buffer yielded significantly higher concentrations of DNA compared to the other protocols, all protocols followed in this study yielded sufficient quantities of DNA for further downstream applications. Therefore, while there are multiple viable options when selecting a DNA extraction protocol, each research project’s individual needs, requirements and resources need to be carefully considered in order to choose the most effective protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8857249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88572492022-02-22 Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols Shuttleworth, Loraine Oosthuizen, Carel Jakobus Sci Rep Article Studies on genetic diversity, adaptive potential and fitness of species have become a major tool in conservation biology. These studies require biological material containing a reliable source of DNA which can be extracted and analysed. Recently, non-invasive sampling has become the preferred sampling method of such biological material; particularly when studying endangered species. Elasmoid scales from teleost fish are an example of non-invasive samples from which DNA can successfully be extracted. This study compared different extraction protocols to find an optimal method for extracting DNA from teleost fish scales. This was done with the intent to use the protocol that yielded the highest quantity of DNA on dried, archived scales. The protocols tested in this study included (1) phenol/chloroform with a TNES-urea digestion buffer, (2) phenol/chloroform with an amniocyte digestion buffer and (3) Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit with variations in incubation times and temperatures of each protocol. While the phenol/chloroform with TNES-urea digestion buffer yielded significantly higher concentrations of DNA compared to the other protocols, all protocols followed in this study yielded sufficient quantities of DNA for further downstream applications. Therefore, while there are multiple viable options when selecting a DNA extraction protocol, each research project’s individual needs, requirements and resources need to be carefully considered in order to choose the most effective protocol. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8857249/ /pubmed/35181723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06889-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Shuttleworth, Loraine Oosthuizen, Carel Jakobus Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols |
title | Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols |
title_full | Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols |
title_fullStr | Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols |
title_short | Comparing DNA yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols |
title_sort | comparing dna yield from fish scales following different extraction protocols |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06889-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shuttleworthloraine comparingdnayieldfromfishscalesfollowingdifferentextractionprotocols AT oosthuizencareljakobus comparingdnayieldfromfishscalesfollowingdifferentextractionprotocols |