Cargando…

Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks

When knowledge has advanced to a state that includes a predictive understanding of the relationship between genome sequence and organism phenotype it will be possible for future engineers to design and produce synthetic organisms. However, the possibility of synthetic biology does not necessarily gu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riolo, Joseph, Steckl, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06723-5
_version_ 1784654014146674688
author Riolo, Joseph
Steckl, Andrew J.
author_facet Riolo, Joseph
Steckl, Andrew J.
author_sort Riolo, Joseph
collection PubMed
description When knowledge has advanced to a state that includes a predictive understanding of the relationship between genome sequence and organism phenotype it will be possible for future engineers to design and produce synthetic organisms. However, the possibility of synthetic biology does not necessarily guarantee its feasibility, in much the same way that the possibility of a brute force attack fails to ensure the timely breaking of robust encryption. The size and range of natural genomes, from a few million base pairs for bacteria to over 100 billion base pairs for some plants, suggests it is necessary to evaluate the practical limits of designing genomes of similar complexity. This analysis characterizes the complexity of natural genomes, compares them to existing engineering benchmarks, and shows that existing large software programs are on similar scale with the genome of complex natural organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8857313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88573132022-02-22 Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks Riolo, Joseph Steckl, Andrew J. Sci Rep Article When knowledge has advanced to a state that includes a predictive understanding of the relationship between genome sequence and organism phenotype it will be possible for future engineers to design and produce synthetic organisms. However, the possibility of synthetic biology does not necessarily guarantee its feasibility, in much the same way that the possibility of a brute force attack fails to ensure the timely breaking of robust encryption. The size and range of natural genomes, from a few million base pairs for bacteria to over 100 billion base pairs for some plants, suggests it is necessary to evaluate the practical limits of designing genomes of similar complexity. This analysis characterizes the complexity of natural genomes, compares them to existing engineering benchmarks, and shows that existing large software programs are on similar scale with the genome of complex natural organisms. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8857313/ /pubmed/35181687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06723-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Riolo, Joseph
Steckl, Andrew J.
Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks
title Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks
title_full Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks
title_short Comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks
title_sort comparative analysis of genome code complexity and manufacturability with engineering benchmarks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06723-5
work_keys_str_mv AT riolojoseph comparativeanalysisofgenomecodecomplexityandmanufacturabilitywithengineeringbenchmarks
AT stecklandrewj comparativeanalysisofgenomecodecomplexityandmanufacturabilitywithengineeringbenchmarks