Cargando…

Data on the Human Versus artificial intelligence process management experiment

Human subject experiments are performed to evaluate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) process management on human design teams solving a complex engineering problem and compare that to the influence of human process management. Participants are grouped into teams of five individuals and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soria Zurita, Nicolas F., Gyory, Joshua T., Balon, Corey, Martin, Jay, Kotovsky, Kenneth, Cagan, Jonathan, McComb, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.107917
_version_ 1784654036433108992
author Soria Zurita, Nicolas F.
Gyory, Joshua T.
Balon, Corey
Martin, Jay
Kotovsky, Kenneth
Cagan, Jonathan
McComb, Christopher
author_facet Soria Zurita, Nicolas F.
Gyory, Joshua T.
Balon, Corey
Martin, Jay
Kotovsky, Kenneth
Cagan, Jonathan
McComb, Christopher
author_sort Soria Zurita, Nicolas F.
collection PubMed
description Human subject experiments are performed to evaluate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) process management on human design teams solving a complex engineering problem and compare that to the influence of human process management. Participants are grouped into teams of five individuals and asked to generate a drone fleet and plan routes to deliver parcels to a given customer market. The teams are placed under the guidance of either a human or an AI external process manager. Halfway through the experiment, the customer market is changed unexpectedly, requiring teams to adjust their strategy. During the experiment, participants can create, evaluate, share their drone designs and delivery routes, and communicate with their team through a text chat tool using a collaborative research platform called HyForm. The research platform collects step-by-step logs of the actions made by and communication amongst participants in both the design team's roles and the process managers. This article presents the data sets collected for 171 participants assigned to 31 design teams, 15 teams under the guidance of an AI agent (5 participants), and 16 teams under the guidance of a human manager (6 participants). These data sets can be used for data-driven design, behavioral analyses, sequence-based analyses, and natural language processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8857413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88574132022-03-02 Data on the Human Versus artificial intelligence process management experiment Soria Zurita, Nicolas F. Gyory, Joshua T. Balon, Corey Martin, Jay Kotovsky, Kenneth Cagan, Jonathan McComb, Christopher Data Brief Data Article Human subject experiments are performed to evaluate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) process management on human design teams solving a complex engineering problem and compare that to the influence of human process management. Participants are grouped into teams of five individuals and asked to generate a drone fleet and plan routes to deliver parcels to a given customer market. The teams are placed under the guidance of either a human or an AI external process manager. Halfway through the experiment, the customer market is changed unexpectedly, requiring teams to adjust their strategy. During the experiment, participants can create, evaluate, share their drone designs and delivery routes, and communicate with their team through a text chat tool using a collaborative research platform called HyForm. The research platform collects step-by-step logs of the actions made by and communication amongst participants in both the design team's roles and the process managers. This article presents the data sets collected for 171 participants assigned to 31 design teams, 15 teams under the guidance of an AI agent (5 participants), and 16 teams under the guidance of a human manager (6 participants). These data sets can be used for data-driven design, behavioral analyses, sequence-based analyses, and natural language processing. Elsevier 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8857413/ /pubmed/35242909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.107917 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Data Article
Soria Zurita, Nicolas F.
Gyory, Joshua T.
Balon, Corey
Martin, Jay
Kotovsky, Kenneth
Cagan, Jonathan
McComb, Christopher
Data on the Human Versus artificial intelligence process management experiment
title Data on the Human Versus artificial intelligence process management experiment
title_full Data on the Human Versus artificial intelligence process management experiment
title_fullStr Data on the Human Versus artificial intelligence process management experiment
title_full_unstemmed Data on the Human Versus artificial intelligence process management experiment
title_short Data on the Human Versus artificial intelligence process management experiment
title_sort data on the human versus artificial intelligence process management experiment
topic Data Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.107917
work_keys_str_mv AT soriazuritanicolasf dataonthehumanversusartificialintelligenceprocessmanagementexperiment
AT gyoryjoshuat dataonthehumanversusartificialintelligenceprocessmanagementexperiment
AT baloncorey dataonthehumanversusartificialintelligenceprocessmanagementexperiment
AT martinjay dataonthehumanversusartificialintelligenceprocessmanagementexperiment
AT kotovskykenneth dataonthehumanversusartificialintelligenceprocessmanagementexperiment
AT caganjonathan dataonthehumanversusartificialintelligenceprocessmanagementexperiment
AT mccombchristopher dataonthehumanversusartificialintelligenceprocessmanagementexperiment