Cargando…

Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence()

Giving is essential for forming and maintaining social relationships, which is an important developmental task for adolescents. This pre-registered fMRI study investigated behavioral and neural correlates of adolescents’ (N = 128, ages 9 – 19 years) small versus large size giving in different social...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Groep, Suzanne, Zanolie, Kiki, Burke, Sarah M., Brandner, Philip, Fuligni, Andrew J., Crone, Eveline A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35180635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101084
_version_ 1784654054792626176
author van de Groep, Suzanne
Zanolie, Kiki
Burke, Sarah M.
Brandner, Philip
Fuligni, Andrew J.
Crone, Eveline A.
author_facet van de Groep, Suzanne
Zanolie, Kiki
Burke, Sarah M.
Brandner, Philip
Fuligni, Andrew J.
Crone, Eveline A.
author_sort van de Groep, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description Giving is essential for forming and maintaining social relationships, which is an important developmental task for adolescents. This pre-registered fMRI study investigated behavioral and neural correlates of adolescents’ (N = 128, ages 9 – 19 years) small versus large size giving in different social contexts related to target (i.e., giving to a friend or unfamiliar peer) and peer presence (i.e., anonymous versus audience giving). Participants gave more in the small size than large size condition, more to friends than to unfamiliar peers, and more in the audience compared to anonymous condition. Giving very small or large amounts was associated with increased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and anterior insula (AI), and older adolescents showed increased lateral and anterior PFC activation for small size giving. We observed activity in the intraparietal cortex (IPL), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and AI for giving to friends, but no age-related differences in this activity. Behaviorally, in contrast, we observed that older adolescents differentiated more in giving between friends and unfamiliar peers. Finally, we observed interactions between peer presence and target in the AI, and between giving magnitude and target in the precuneus. Together, findings reveal higher context-dependency of giving and more lateral PFC activity for small versus large giving in older adolescents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8857499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88574992022-03-02 Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence() van de Groep, Suzanne Zanolie, Kiki Burke, Sarah M. Brandner, Philip Fuligni, Andrew J. Crone, Eveline A. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Giving is essential for forming and maintaining social relationships, which is an important developmental task for adolescents. This pre-registered fMRI study investigated behavioral and neural correlates of adolescents’ (N = 128, ages 9 – 19 years) small versus large size giving in different social contexts related to target (i.e., giving to a friend or unfamiliar peer) and peer presence (i.e., anonymous versus audience giving). Participants gave more in the small size than large size condition, more to friends than to unfamiliar peers, and more in the audience compared to anonymous condition. Giving very small or large amounts was associated with increased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and anterior insula (AI), and older adolescents showed increased lateral and anterior PFC activation for small size giving. We observed activity in the intraparietal cortex (IPL), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and AI for giving to friends, but no age-related differences in this activity. Behaviorally, in contrast, we observed that older adolescents differentiated more in giving between friends and unfamiliar peers. Finally, we observed interactions between peer presence and target in the AI, and between giving magnitude and target in the precuneus. Together, findings reveal higher context-dependency of giving and more lateral PFC activity for small versus large giving in older adolescents. Elsevier 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8857499/ /pubmed/35180635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101084 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
van de Groep, Suzanne
Zanolie, Kiki
Burke, Sarah M.
Brandner, Philip
Fuligni, Andrew J.
Crone, Eveline A.
Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence()
title Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence()
title_full Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence()
title_fullStr Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence()
title_full_unstemmed Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence()
title_short Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence()
title_sort growing in generosity? the effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence()
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35180635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101084
work_keys_str_mv AT vandegroepsuzanne growingingenerositytheeffectsofgivingmagnitudetargetandaudienceontheneuralsignatureofgivinginadolescence
AT zanoliekiki growingingenerositytheeffectsofgivingmagnitudetargetandaudienceontheneuralsignatureofgivinginadolescence
AT burkesarahm growingingenerositytheeffectsofgivingmagnitudetargetandaudienceontheneuralsignatureofgivinginadolescence
AT brandnerphilip growingingenerositytheeffectsofgivingmagnitudetargetandaudienceontheneuralsignatureofgivinginadolescence
AT fuligniandrewj growingingenerositytheeffectsofgivingmagnitudetargetandaudienceontheneuralsignatureofgivinginadolescence
AT croneevelinea growingingenerositytheeffectsofgivingmagnitudetargetandaudienceontheneuralsignatureofgivinginadolescence