Cargando…

Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study

This observational cohort study investigates neurocognitive functioning (NCF) and its associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and patient-reported psychological toxicities in locally-advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients receiving loco-regio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Weijst, Lotte, Lievens, Yolande, Surmont, Veerle, Schrauwen, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.02.004
_version_ 1784654057459154944
author van der Weijst, Lotte
Lievens, Yolande
Surmont, Veerle
Schrauwen, Wim
author_facet van der Weijst, Lotte
Lievens, Yolande
Surmont, Veerle
Schrauwen, Wim
author_sort van der Weijst, Lotte
collection PubMed
description This observational cohort study investigates neurocognitive functioning (NCF) and its associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and patient-reported psychological toxicities in locally-advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients receiving loco-regional radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy. Objective NCF data was collected with six psychometrically validated neurocognitive tests. Subjective NCF was assessed with the cognitive domain of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items. Psychological toxicity data was collected with the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events. Meaningful clinical important differences were determined for changes in NCF. Univariate Cox proportional hazards models and generalized linear models were used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.01). In total, 50 patients were recruited. At baseline, 13 (26%) patients had an impaired objective NCF. Over time, deterioration was seen in 11% (n = 3), 5% (n = 1) and 6% (n = 1) of patients at 2–3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The OS of patients with a normal NCF at baseline was longer than those with an impaired baseline NCF (29.5 vs 17.1 months). No statistical significance has been reached between NCF and OS (p = .353) nor NCF and DFS (p = .251). Objective NCF was not correlated with subjective NCF (p = .193), nor anxiety (p = .504), depression (p = .513), memory problems (p = .813) and concentration problems (p = .813). Systemic treatment and loco-regional radiotherapy may have a temporarily negative impact on NCF in a small proportion of locally-advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Baseline NCF could be a predictor for OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8857514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88575142022-03-02 Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study van der Weijst, Lotte Lievens, Yolande Surmont, Veerle Schrauwen, Wim Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Research article This observational cohort study investigates neurocognitive functioning (NCF) and its associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and patient-reported psychological toxicities in locally-advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients receiving loco-regional radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy. Objective NCF data was collected with six psychometrically validated neurocognitive tests. Subjective NCF was assessed with the cognitive domain of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items. Psychological toxicity data was collected with the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events. Meaningful clinical important differences were determined for changes in NCF. Univariate Cox proportional hazards models and generalized linear models were used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.01). In total, 50 patients were recruited. At baseline, 13 (26%) patients had an impaired objective NCF. Over time, deterioration was seen in 11% (n = 3), 5% (n = 1) and 6% (n = 1) of patients at 2–3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The OS of patients with a normal NCF at baseline was longer than those with an impaired baseline NCF (29.5 vs 17.1 months). No statistical significance has been reached between NCF and OS (p = .353) nor NCF and DFS (p = .251). Objective NCF was not correlated with subjective NCF (p = .193), nor anxiety (p = .504), depression (p = .513), memory problems (p = .813) and concentration problems (p = .813). Systemic treatment and loco-regional radiotherapy may have a temporarily negative impact on NCF in a small proportion of locally-advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Baseline NCF could be a predictor for OS. Elsevier 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8857514/ /pubmed/35243042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.02.004 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research article
van der Weijst, Lotte
Lievens, Yolande
Surmont, Veerle
Schrauwen, Wim
Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study
title Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study
title_full Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study
title_fullStr Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study
title_full_unstemmed Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study
title_short Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study
title_sort neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: the pro-long study
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.02.004
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderweijstlotte neurocognitivefunctioningfollowinglungcancertreatmenttheprolongstudy
AT lievensyolande neurocognitivefunctioningfollowinglungcancertreatmenttheprolongstudy
AT surmontveerle neurocognitivefunctioningfollowinglungcancertreatmenttheprolongstudy
AT schrauwenwim neurocognitivefunctioningfollowinglungcancertreatmenttheprolongstudy