Brand interchangeability of pepsinogen tests in the real-world setting after eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a community-based study

BACKGROUND: Serum pepsinogen (PG) is recommended as a screening test for premalignant gastric lesions. However, real-world evidence demonstrating its applicability and equivalence between different test brands is limited. METHODS: Mass screening began in 2018 in a high-risk Taiwanese population after eradication of Helicobacter pylori, with the first stage of two PG tests (GastroPanel(®), Helsinki, Finland and LZ-Test(®), Tokyo, Japan) and the second stage of endoscopy. A positive test was defined as PG-I < 30 ng/mL or PG-I/II ratio < 3 for GastroPanel(®) and PG-I ≤ 70 ng/mL and PG-I/II ratio ≤ 3 for LZ-Test(®). Index lesions included atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. Test performance was evaluated based on the participation rate, positivity rate, referral rate, positive predictive value (PPV), and the detection rate. RESULTS: Among 7616 eligible participants, 5117 (67.2%) received PG tests and 284 (5.6%) tested positive. Of those who tested positive, 105 (37.0%) underwent endoscopy. Overall PPVs for atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia were 12.4% and 18.9%, respectively, with detection rates of 2.5 and 3.9 per 1000, respectively. Correlations of numerical measures between tests were high and the agreements of test results were substantial. The PPVs (16.3% vs. 16.3% and 23.8% vs. 21.3%, P = 1.00 and 0.71, respectively), detection rates (2.5 vs. 2.5 and 3.7 vs. 3.3 per 1000, P = 1.00 and 0.27, respectively), and the stage distributions of gastritis were all comparable, which were confirmed by multiple regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PG testing is effective for mass screening after eradication of H. pylori. Tests from different manufacturers, even using different analytical methods and cutoff criteria, can perform equivalently. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02155-7.