Cargando…
Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has a pharmacological profile that should allow rapid recovery and prevent undesirable outcomes such as pulmonary complications. METHODS: This large retrospective study compared the beneficial effects of perioperative infusion of DEX with propofol on the postoperati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35183122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01589-6 |
_version_ | 1784654122355523584 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Jie Lv, Bingfeng West, Raha Chen, Xingpeng Yan, Yali Pac Soo, Chen Ma, Daqing |
author_facet | Hu, Jie Lv, Bingfeng West, Raha Chen, Xingpeng Yan, Yali Pac Soo, Chen Ma, Daqing |
author_sort | Hu, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has a pharmacological profile that should allow rapid recovery and prevent undesirable outcomes such as pulmonary complications. METHODS: This large retrospective study compared the beneficial effects of perioperative infusion of DEX with propofol on the postoperative outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We reviewed patients’ medical notes at Luoyang Central Hospital from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2019. All continuous variables, if normally distributed, were presented as mean ± SD; Otherwise, the non-normally distributed data and categorical data were presented as median (25-75 IQR) or number (percentage). The Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate the difference of variables between the DEX and propofol groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the main related and differential factors in the perioperative period. RESULTS: A total of 1388 patients were included in the study; of those, 557 patients received propofol infusion, and 831 patients received dexmedetomidine. DEX significantly reduced postoperative pulmonary complications compared with propofol, 7.82% vs 13.29%; P < 0.01, respectively. When compared with propofol, DEX significantly shortened the duration of mechanical lung ventilation, 18 (13,25) hours vs 21 (16,37) hours; P < 0.001, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, 51 (42,90) vs 59 (46,94.5) hours; P = 0.001 and hospital stay, 20 (17,24) vs 22 (17,28) days; P < 0.001, respectively. The incidences of postoperative wound dehiscence and infection were significantly reduced with DEX compared with propofol groups, 2.53% vs 6.64%; P < 0.001, respectively. Interestingly, patients receiving DEX had significantly shorter surgical time compared to propofol; 275 (240,310) vs 280 (250,320) minutes respectively (P = 0.005) and less estimated blood loss (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative infusion of dexmedetomidine improved the desirable outcomes in patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with propofol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8857833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88578332022-02-23 Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study Hu, Jie Lv, Bingfeng West, Raha Chen, Xingpeng Yan, Yali Pac Soo, Chen Ma, Daqing BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has a pharmacological profile that should allow rapid recovery and prevent undesirable outcomes such as pulmonary complications. METHODS: This large retrospective study compared the beneficial effects of perioperative infusion of DEX with propofol on the postoperative outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We reviewed patients’ medical notes at Luoyang Central Hospital from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2019. All continuous variables, if normally distributed, were presented as mean ± SD; Otherwise, the non-normally distributed data and categorical data were presented as median (25-75 IQR) or number (percentage). The Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate the difference of variables between the DEX and propofol groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the main related and differential factors in the perioperative period. RESULTS: A total of 1388 patients were included in the study; of those, 557 patients received propofol infusion, and 831 patients received dexmedetomidine. DEX significantly reduced postoperative pulmonary complications compared with propofol, 7.82% vs 13.29%; P < 0.01, respectively. When compared with propofol, DEX significantly shortened the duration of mechanical lung ventilation, 18 (13,25) hours vs 21 (16,37) hours; P < 0.001, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, 51 (42,90) vs 59 (46,94.5) hours; P = 0.001 and hospital stay, 20 (17,24) vs 22 (17,28) days; P < 0.001, respectively. The incidences of postoperative wound dehiscence and infection were significantly reduced with DEX compared with propofol groups, 2.53% vs 6.64%; P < 0.001, respectively. Interestingly, patients receiving DEX had significantly shorter surgical time compared to propofol; 275 (240,310) vs 280 (250,320) minutes respectively (P = 0.005) and less estimated blood loss (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative infusion of dexmedetomidine improved the desirable outcomes in patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with propofol. BioMed Central 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8857833/ /pubmed/35183122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01589-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hu, Jie Lv, Bingfeng West, Raha Chen, Xingpeng Yan, Yali Pac Soo, Chen Ma, Daqing Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study |
title | Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study |
title_full | Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study |
title_short | Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study |
title_sort | comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35183122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01589-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hujie comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT lvbingfeng comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT westraha comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT chenxingpeng comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT yanyali comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT pacsoochen comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT madaqing comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy |