Cargando…

Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has a pharmacological profile that should allow rapid recovery and prevent undesirable outcomes such as pulmonary complications. METHODS: This large retrospective study compared the beneficial effects of perioperative infusion of DEX with propofol on the postoperati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Jie, Lv, Bingfeng, West, Raha, Chen, Xingpeng, Yan, Yali, Pac Soo, Chen, Ma, Daqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35183122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01589-6
_version_ 1784654122355523584
author Hu, Jie
Lv, Bingfeng
West, Raha
Chen, Xingpeng
Yan, Yali
Pac Soo, Chen
Ma, Daqing
author_facet Hu, Jie
Lv, Bingfeng
West, Raha
Chen, Xingpeng
Yan, Yali
Pac Soo, Chen
Ma, Daqing
author_sort Hu, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has a pharmacological profile that should allow rapid recovery and prevent undesirable outcomes such as pulmonary complications. METHODS: This large retrospective study compared the beneficial effects of perioperative infusion of DEX with propofol on the postoperative outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We reviewed patients’ medical notes at Luoyang Central Hospital from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2019. All continuous variables, if normally distributed, were presented as mean ± SD; Otherwise, the non-normally distributed data and categorical data were presented as median (25-75 IQR) or number (percentage). The Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate the difference of variables between the DEX and propofol groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the main related and differential factors in the perioperative period. RESULTS: A total of 1388 patients were included in the study; of those, 557 patients received propofol infusion, and 831 patients received dexmedetomidine. DEX significantly reduced postoperative pulmonary complications compared with propofol, 7.82% vs 13.29%; P < 0.01, respectively. When compared with propofol, DEX significantly shortened the duration of mechanical lung ventilation, 18 (13,25) hours vs 21 (16,37) hours; P < 0.001, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, 51 (42,90) vs 59 (46,94.5) hours; P = 0.001 and hospital stay, 20 (17,24) vs 22 (17,28) days; P < 0.001, respectively. The incidences of postoperative wound dehiscence and infection were significantly reduced with DEX compared with propofol groups, 2.53% vs 6.64%; P < 0.001, respectively. Interestingly, patients receiving DEX had significantly shorter surgical time compared to propofol; 275 (240,310) vs 280 (250,320) minutes respectively (P = 0.005) and less estimated blood loss (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative infusion of dexmedetomidine improved the desirable outcomes in patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with propofol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8857833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88578332022-02-23 Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study Hu, Jie Lv, Bingfeng West, Raha Chen, Xingpeng Yan, Yali Pac Soo, Chen Ma, Daqing BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has a pharmacological profile that should allow rapid recovery and prevent undesirable outcomes such as pulmonary complications. METHODS: This large retrospective study compared the beneficial effects of perioperative infusion of DEX with propofol on the postoperative outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We reviewed patients’ medical notes at Luoyang Central Hospital from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2019. All continuous variables, if normally distributed, were presented as mean ± SD; Otherwise, the non-normally distributed data and categorical data were presented as median (25-75 IQR) or number (percentage). The Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate the difference of variables between the DEX and propofol groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the main related and differential factors in the perioperative period. RESULTS: A total of 1388 patients were included in the study; of those, 557 patients received propofol infusion, and 831 patients received dexmedetomidine. DEX significantly reduced postoperative pulmonary complications compared with propofol, 7.82% vs 13.29%; P < 0.01, respectively. When compared with propofol, DEX significantly shortened the duration of mechanical lung ventilation, 18 (13,25) hours vs 21 (16,37) hours; P < 0.001, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, 51 (42,90) vs 59 (46,94.5) hours; P = 0.001 and hospital stay, 20 (17,24) vs 22 (17,28) days; P < 0.001, respectively. The incidences of postoperative wound dehiscence and infection were significantly reduced with DEX compared with propofol groups, 2.53% vs 6.64%; P < 0.001, respectively. Interestingly, patients receiving DEX had significantly shorter surgical time compared to propofol; 275 (240,310) vs 280 (250,320) minutes respectively (P = 0.005) and less estimated blood loss (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative infusion of dexmedetomidine improved the desirable outcomes in patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with propofol. BioMed Central 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8857833/ /pubmed/35183122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01589-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Jie
Lv, Bingfeng
West, Raha
Chen, Xingpeng
Yan, Yali
Pac Soo, Chen
Ma, Daqing
Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study
title Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35183122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01589-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hujie comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT lvbingfeng comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT westraha comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT chenxingpeng comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT yanyali comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT pacsoochen comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT madaqing comparisonbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolonoutcomesaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivestudy