Cargando…

Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study

PURPOSE: The nutritional risk index (NRI) and handgrip strength (HGS) are useful indicators of nutritional and physical status, respectively, both of them can predict the prognosis of many cancers; however, the predictive accuracy of a single indicator is unsatisfactory. Whether the combination of N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Hailun, Ruan, Guotian, Zhang, Qi, Ge, Yizhong, Song, Mengmeng, Zhang, Xi, Liu, Xiaoyue, Lin, Shiqi, Zhang, Xiaowei, Li, Xiangrui, Zhang, Kangping, Yang, Ming, Tang, Meng, Cong, Minghua, Shi, Hanping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210808
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S352250
_version_ 1784654163523665920
author Xie, Hailun
Ruan, Guotian
Zhang, Qi
Ge, Yizhong
Song, Mengmeng
Zhang, Xi
Liu, Xiaoyue
Lin, Shiqi
Zhang, Xiaowei
Li, Xiangrui
Zhang, Kangping
Yang, Ming
Tang, Meng
Cong, Minghua
Shi, Hanping
author_facet Xie, Hailun
Ruan, Guotian
Zhang, Qi
Ge, Yizhong
Song, Mengmeng
Zhang, Xi
Liu, Xiaoyue
Lin, Shiqi
Zhang, Xiaowei
Li, Xiangrui
Zhang, Kangping
Yang, Ming
Tang, Meng
Cong, Minghua
Shi, Hanping
author_sort Xie, Hailun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The nutritional risk index (NRI) and handgrip strength (HGS) are useful indicators of nutritional and physical status, respectively, both of them can predict the prognosis of many cancers; however, the predictive accuracy of a single indicator is unsatisfactory. Whether the combination of NRI and HGS could enhance the stratification of the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. We combined NRI and HGS and constructed the NRI–HGS score. Restricted cubic splines were used to assess the associations between NRI, HGS, and all-cause mortality. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival probability of the patients. The Cox proportional hazards risk model was used to analyze survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Low NRI and low HGS were independent predictors of poor prognosis in patients with cancer cachexia. The NRI–HGS score showed a better prognostic stratification than either NRI or HGS. The co-occurrence of low NRI and low HGS was associated with an approximately 1.8-fold increased risk of mortality. The NRI–HGS score could effectively distinguish patients with a poor prognosis at different pathological stages. Furthermore, we constructed a novel prognostic nomogram based on NRI and HGS. The concordance index and calibration plot confirmed that the nomogram had good prognostic accuracy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram reached >0.8, which was much higher than that of the traditional tumor–node–metastasis staging system. The nomogram provided better prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. CONCLUSION: Low NRI and low HGS are independent prognostic indicators in cancer cachexia. The combination of NRI and HGS improve prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. Our study suggests combining nutritional and physical status in future cachexia research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8858023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88580232022-02-23 Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study Xie, Hailun Ruan, Guotian Zhang, Qi Ge, Yizhong Song, Mengmeng Zhang, Xi Liu, Xiaoyue Lin, Shiqi Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Xiangrui Zhang, Kangping Yang, Ming Tang, Meng Cong, Minghua Shi, Hanping J Inflamm Res Original Research PURPOSE: The nutritional risk index (NRI) and handgrip strength (HGS) are useful indicators of nutritional and physical status, respectively, both of them can predict the prognosis of many cancers; however, the predictive accuracy of a single indicator is unsatisfactory. Whether the combination of NRI and HGS could enhance the stratification of the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. We combined NRI and HGS and constructed the NRI–HGS score. Restricted cubic splines were used to assess the associations between NRI, HGS, and all-cause mortality. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival probability of the patients. The Cox proportional hazards risk model was used to analyze survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Low NRI and low HGS were independent predictors of poor prognosis in patients with cancer cachexia. The NRI–HGS score showed a better prognostic stratification than either NRI or HGS. The co-occurrence of low NRI and low HGS was associated with an approximately 1.8-fold increased risk of mortality. The NRI–HGS score could effectively distinguish patients with a poor prognosis at different pathological stages. Furthermore, we constructed a novel prognostic nomogram based on NRI and HGS. The concordance index and calibration plot confirmed that the nomogram had good prognostic accuracy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram reached >0.8, which was much higher than that of the traditional tumor–node–metastasis staging system. The nomogram provided better prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. CONCLUSION: Low NRI and low HGS are independent prognostic indicators in cancer cachexia. The combination of NRI and HGS improve prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. Our study suggests combining nutritional and physical status in future cachexia research. Dove 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8858023/ /pubmed/35210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S352250 Text en © 2022 Xie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Xie, Hailun
Ruan, Guotian
Zhang, Qi
Ge, Yizhong
Song, Mengmeng
Zhang, Xi
Liu, Xiaoyue
Lin, Shiqi
Zhang, Xiaowei
Li, Xiangrui
Zhang, Kangping
Yang, Ming
Tang, Meng
Cong, Minghua
Shi, Hanping
Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study
title Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study
title_full Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study
title_fullStr Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study
title_short Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study
title_sort combination of nutritional risk index and handgrip strength on the survival of patients with cancer cachexia: a multi- center cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210808
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S352250
work_keys_str_mv AT xiehailun combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT ruanguotian combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT zhangqi combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT geyizhong combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT songmengmeng combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT zhangxi combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT liuxiaoyue combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT linshiqi combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT zhangxiaowei combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT lixiangrui combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT zhangkangping combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT yangming combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT tangmeng combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT congminghua combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy
AT shihanping combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy