Cargando…
Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study
PURPOSE: The nutritional risk index (NRI) and handgrip strength (HGS) are useful indicators of nutritional and physical status, respectively, both of them can predict the prognosis of many cancers; however, the predictive accuracy of a single indicator is unsatisfactory. Whether the combination of N...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S352250 |
_version_ | 1784654163523665920 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Hailun Ruan, Guotian Zhang, Qi Ge, Yizhong Song, Mengmeng Zhang, Xi Liu, Xiaoyue Lin, Shiqi Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Xiangrui Zhang, Kangping Yang, Ming Tang, Meng Cong, Minghua Shi, Hanping |
author_facet | Xie, Hailun Ruan, Guotian Zhang, Qi Ge, Yizhong Song, Mengmeng Zhang, Xi Liu, Xiaoyue Lin, Shiqi Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Xiangrui Zhang, Kangping Yang, Ming Tang, Meng Cong, Minghua Shi, Hanping |
author_sort | Xie, Hailun |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The nutritional risk index (NRI) and handgrip strength (HGS) are useful indicators of nutritional and physical status, respectively, both of them can predict the prognosis of many cancers; however, the predictive accuracy of a single indicator is unsatisfactory. Whether the combination of NRI and HGS could enhance the stratification of the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. We combined NRI and HGS and constructed the NRI–HGS score. Restricted cubic splines were used to assess the associations between NRI, HGS, and all-cause mortality. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival probability of the patients. The Cox proportional hazards risk model was used to analyze survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Low NRI and low HGS were independent predictors of poor prognosis in patients with cancer cachexia. The NRI–HGS score showed a better prognostic stratification than either NRI or HGS. The co-occurrence of low NRI and low HGS was associated with an approximately 1.8-fold increased risk of mortality. The NRI–HGS score could effectively distinguish patients with a poor prognosis at different pathological stages. Furthermore, we constructed a novel prognostic nomogram based on NRI and HGS. The concordance index and calibration plot confirmed that the nomogram had good prognostic accuracy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram reached >0.8, which was much higher than that of the traditional tumor–node–metastasis staging system. The nomogram provided better prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. CONCLUSION: Low NRI and low HGS are independent prognostic indicators in cancer cachexia. The combination of NRI and HGS improve prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. Our study suggests combining nutritional and physical status in future cachexia research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8858023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88580232022-02-23 Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study Xie, Hailun Ruan, Guotian Zhang, Qi Ge, Yizhong Song, Mengmeng Zhang, Xi Liu, Xiaoyue Lin, Shiqi Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Xiangrui Zhang, Kangping Yang, Ming Tang, Meng Cong, Minghua Shi, Hanping J Inflamm Res Original Research PURPOSE: The nutritional risk index (NRI) and handgrip strength (HGS) are useful indicators of nutritional and physical status, respectively, both of them can predict the prognosis of many cancers; however, the predictive accuracy of a single indicator is unsatisfactory. Whether the combination of NRI and HGS could enhance the stratification of the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. We combined NRI and HGS and constructed the NRI–HGS score. Restricted cubic splines were used to assess the associations between NRI, HGS, and all-cause mortality. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival probability of the patients. The Cox proportional hazards risk model was used to analyze survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Low NRI and low HGS were independent predictors of poor prognosis in patients with cancer cachexia. The NRI–HGS score showed a better prognostic stratification than either NRI or HGS. The co-occurrence of low NRI and low HGS was associated with an approximately 1.8-fold increased risk of mortality. The NRI–HGS score could effectively distinguish patients with a poor prognosis at different pathological stages. Furthermore, we constructed a novel prognostic nomogram based on NRI and HGS. The concordance index and calibration plot confirmed that the nomogram had good prognostic accuracy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram reached >0.8, which was much higher than that of the traditional tumor–node–metastasis staging system. The nomogram provided better prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. CONCLUSION: Low NRI and low HGS are independent prognostic indicators in cancer cachexia. The combination of NRI and HGS improve prognostic stratification for patients with cancer cachexia. Our study suggests combining nutritional and physical status in future cachexia research. Dove 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8858023/ /pubmed/35210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S352250 Text en © 2022 Xie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Xie, Hailun Ruan, Guotian Zhang, Qi Ge, Yizhong Song, Mengmeng Zhang, Xi Liu, Xiaoyue Lin, Shiqi Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Xiangrui Zhang, Kangping Yang, Ming Tang, Meng Cong, Minghua Shi, Hanping Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study |
title | Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study |
title_full | Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study |
title_short | Combination of Nutritional Risk Index and Handgrip Strength on the Survival of Patients with Cancer Cachexia: A Multi- Center Cohort Study |
title_sort | combination of nutritional risk index and handgrip strength on the survival of patients with cancer cachexia: a multi- center cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210808 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S352250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiehailun combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT ruanguotian combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT zhangqi combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT geyizhong combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT songmengmeng combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT zhangxi combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT liuxiaoyue combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT linshiqi combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT zhangxiaowei combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT lixiangrui combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT zhangkangping combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT yangming combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT tangmeng combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT congminghua combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy AT shihanping combinationofnutritionalriskindexandhandgripstrengthonthesurvivalofpatientswithcancercachexiaamulticentercohortstudy |