Cargando…

Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of different mHealth interventions in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. METHODS: A literature search for eligible studies was done in ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Scopus in October 2020....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elepaño, Anton, Fusingan, Alyssa Samantha, Yasay, Eric, Sahagun, Jereel Aron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710983
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.10.3093
_version_ 1784654207703318528
author Elepaño, Anton
Fusingan, Alyssa Samantha
Yasay, Eric
Sahagun, Jereel Aron
author_facet Elepaño, Anton
Fusingan, Alyssa Samantha
Yasay, Eric
Sahagun, Jereel Aron
author_sort Elepaño, Anton
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of different mHealth interventions in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. METHODS: A literature search for eligible studies was done in ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Scopus in October 2020. Included studies were randomized controlled trials done on adults due for CRC screening, who received either an mHealth intervention to promote screening or usual care. The primary outcome from these studies was completion of CRC screening. Two reviewers independently worked on selecting studies, collecting data, and determining risk of bias. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for CRC screening rates were summarized into a Forest plot. RESULTS: A total of ten trials from three continents were included in the qualitative analysis. Risk of bias is low in terms of randomization, but high in terms of participant blinding, due to the nature of the interventions. Meta-analysis of four trials showed low clinical and statistical heterogeneity (I(2)=0%). Overall, the use of mHealth interventions is associated with higher CRC screening uptake when compared to usual care (AOR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.46). This effect was seen across different types of mHealth interventions, which included automated and non-automated telephone education and text-message reminders. CONCLUSION: This study showed that mHealth is associated with increased CRC screening participation regardless of the type of intervention used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8858239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88582392022-04-04 Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Elepaño, Anton Fusingan, Alyssa Samantha Yasay, Eric Sahagun, Jereel Aron Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Review Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of different mHealth interventions in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. METHODS: A literature search for eligible studies was done in ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Scopus in October 2020. Included studies were randomized controlled trials done on adults due for CRC screening, who received either an mHealth intervention to promote screening or usual care. The primary outcome from these studies was completion of CRC screening. Two reviewers independently worked on selecting studies, collecting data, and determining risk of bias. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for CRC screening rates were summarized into a Forest plot. RESULTS: A total of ten trials from three continents were included in the qualitative analysis. Risk of bias is low in terms of randomization, but high in terms of participant blinding, due to the nature of the interventions. Meta-analysis of four trials showed low clinical and statistical heterogeneity (I(2)=0%). Overall, the use of mHealth interventions is associated with higher CRC screening uptake when compared to usual care (AOR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.46). This effect was seen across different types of mHealth interventions, which included automated and non-automated telephone education and text-message reminders. CONCLUSION: This study showed that mHealth is associated with increased CRC screening participation regardless of the type of intervention used. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8858239/ /pubmed/34710983 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.10.3093 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Elepaño, Anton
Fusingan, Alyssa Samantha
Yasay, Eric
Sahagun, Jereel Aron
Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort mobile health interventions for improving colorectal cancer screening rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710983
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.10.3093
work_keys_str_mv AT elepanoanton mobilehealthinterventionsforimprovingcolorectalcancerscreeningratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fusinganalyssasamantha mobilehealthinterventionsforimprovingcolorectalcancerscreeningratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yasayeric mobilehealthinterventionsforimprovingcolorectalcancerscreeningratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sahagunjereelaron mobilehealthinterventionsforimprovingcolorectalcancerscreeningratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis