Cargando…

Effects of Physicians’ Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Providing diagnostic and treatment information to patients is a core clinical skill, but evidence for the effectiveness of different information-giving strategies is inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to investigate the reported effects of empirically tested communication strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lie, Hanne C., Juvet, Lene K., Street, Richard L., Gulbrandsen, Pål, Mellblom, Anneli V., Brembo, Espen Andreas, Eide, Hilde, Heyn, Lena, Saltveit, Kristina H., Strømme, Hilde, Sundling, Vibeke, Turk, Eva, Menichetti, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34355348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07044-5
_version_ 1784654226515820544
author Lie, Hanne C.
Juvet, Lene K.
Street, Richard L.
Gulbrandsen, Pål
Mellblom, Anneli V.
Brembo, Espen Andreas
Eide, Hilde
Heyn, Lena
Saltveit, Kristina H.
Strømme, Hilde
Sundling, Vibeke
Turk, Eva
Menichetti, Julia
author_facet Lie, Hanne C.
Juvet, Lene K.
Street, Richard L.
Gulbrandsen, Pål
Mellblom, Anneli V.
Brembo, Espen Andreas
Eide, Hilde
Heyn, Lena
Saltveit, Kristina H.
Strømme, Hilde
Sundling, Vibeke
Turk, Eva
Menichetti, Julia
author_sort Lie, Hanne C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providing diagnostic and treatment information to patients is a core clinical skill, but evidence for the effectiveness of different information-giving strategies is inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to investigate the reported effects of empirically tested communication strategies for providing information on patient-related outcomes: information recall and (health-related) behaviors. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and relevant bibliographies were systematically searched from the inception to April 24, 2020, without restrictions, for articles testing information-giving strategies for physicians (PROSPERO ID: CRD42019115791). Pairs of independent reviewers identified randomized controlled studies with a low risk of selection bias as from the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Main outcomes were grouped into patient information recall and behavioral outcomes (e.g., alcohol consumption, weight loss, participation in screening). Due to high heterogeneity in the data on effects of interventions, these outcomes were descriptively reported, together with studies’, interventions’, and information-giving strategies’ characteristics. PRISMA guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Seventeen of 9423 articles were included. Eight studies, reporting 10 interventions, assessed patient information recall: mostly conducted in experimental settings and testing a single information-giving strategy. Four of the ten interventions reported significant increase in recall. Nine studies assessed behavioral outcomes, mostly in real-life clinical settings and testing multiple information-giving strategies simultaneously. The heterogeneity in this group of studies was high. Eight of the nine interventions reported a significant positive effect on objectively and subjectively measured patients’ behavioral outcomes. DISCUSSION: Using specific framing strategies for achieving specific communication goals when providing information to patients appears to have positive effects on information recall and patient health–related behaviors. The heterogeneity observed in this group of studies testifies the need for a more consistent methodological and conceptual agenda when testing medical information-giving strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019115791 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07044-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8858343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88583432022-02-23 Effects of Physicians’ Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review Lie, Hanne C. Juvet, Lene K. Street, Richard L. Gulbrandsen, Pål Mellblom, Anneli V. Brembo, Espen Andreas Eide, Hilde Heyn, Lena Saltveit, Kristina H. Strømme, Hilde Sundling, Vibeke Turk, Eva Menichetti, Julia J Gen Intern Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Providing diagnostic and treatment information to patients is a core clinical skill, but evidence for the effectiveness of different information-giving strategies is inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to investigate the reported effects of empirically tested communication strategies for providing information on patient-related outcomes: information recall and (health-related) behaviors. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and relevant bibliographies were systematically searched from the inception to April 24, 2020, without restrictions, for articles testing information-giving strategies for physicians (PROSPERO ID: CRD42019115791). Pairs of independent reviewers identified randomized controlled studies with a low risk of selection bias as from the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Main outcomes were grouped into patient information recall and behavioral outcomes (e.g., alcohol consumption, weight loss, participation in screening). Due to high heterogeneity in the data on effects of interventions, these outcomes were descriptively reported, together with studies’, interventions’, and information-giving strategies’ characteristics. PRISMA guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Seventeen of 9423 articles were included. Eight studies, reporting 10 interventions, assessed patient information recall: mostly conducted in experimental settings and testing a single information-giving strategy. Four of the ten interventions reported significant increase in recall. Nine studies assessed behavioral outcomes, mostly in real-life clinical settings and testing multiple information-giving strategies simultaneously. The heterogeneity in this group of studies was high. Eight of the nine interventions reported a significant positive effect on objectively and subjectively measured patients’ behavioral outcomes. DISCUSSION: Using specific framing strategies for achieving specific communication goals when providing information to patients appears to have positive effects on information recall and patient health–related behaviors. The heterogeneity observed in this group of studies testifies the need for a more consistent methodological and conceptual agenda when testing medical information-giving strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019115791 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07044-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-05 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8858343/ /pubmed/34355348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07044-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lie, Hanne C.
Juvet, Lene K.
Street, Richard L.
Gulbrandsen, Pål
Mellblom, Anneli V.
Brembo, Espen Andreas
Eide, Hilde
Heyn, Lena
Saltveit, Kristina H.
Strømme, Hilde
Sundling, Vibeke
Turk, Eva
Menichetti, Julia
Effects of Physicians’ Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review
title Effects of Physicians’ Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review
title_full Effects of Physicians’ Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effects of Physicians’ Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Physicians’ Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review
title_short Effects of Physicians’ Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review
title_sort effects of physicians’ information giving on patient outcomes: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34355348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07044-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liehannec effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT juvetlenek effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT streetrichardl effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT gulbrandsenpal effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT mellblomanneliv effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT bremboespenandreas effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT eidehilde effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT heynlena effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT saltveitkristinah effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT strømmehilde effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT sundlingvibeke effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT turkeva effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview
AT menichettijulia effectsofphysiciansinformationgivingonpatientoutcomesasystematicreview