Cargando…

Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine

The aim of the study was to assess clinical decision support system (CDSS) in spinal surgery for personalized minimally invasive technologies on lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study involved 59 patients operated on using CDSS based on a personalized surgical algorithm consideri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byvaltsev, V.А., Kalinin, А.А.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Privolzhsky Research Medical University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265345
http://dx.doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.02
_version_ 1784654236972220416
author Byvaltsev, V.А.
Kalinin, А.А.
author_facet Byvaltsev, V.А.
Kalinin, А.А.
author_sort Byvaltsev, V.А.
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to assess clinical decision support system (CDSS) in spinal surgery for personalized minimally invasive technologies on lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study involved 59 patients operated on using CDSS based on a personalized surgical algorithm considering patient-specific parameters of lumbar segments. Among them, 11 patients underwent total disk replacement (TDR), 25 and 23 patients had minimally invasive (MI-TLIF) and open (O-TLIF) dorsal rigid stabilization, respectively, according to an original technology. The comparative analysis was carried out using retrospective findings of 196 patients operated on involving TDR (n=42), MI-TLIF (n=79), and O-TLIF (n=75). The efficiency of CDSS medical algorithms was assessed by pain syndrome in the lumbar spine and lower limbs, as well as by patients’ functional status on discharge according to ODI, 3 and 6 months after the operation. RESULTS: The comparison by gender characteristics and anthropometric data revealed no significant intergroup differences among the groups under study (p>0.05). Intergroup analysis of functional status by ODI, pain intensity in lower limbs and lumbar spine showed better clinical outcomes in patients operated using CDSS compared to a retrospective group (p<0.05): 6 months after TDR and O-TLIF, and 3 months after MI-TLIF. CONCLUSION: The study findings demonstrated high efficiency of CDSS developed for personalized surgical treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases taking into consideration individual biometric parameters of lumbar segments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8858415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Privolzhsky Research Medical University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88584152022-03-08 Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine Byvaltsev, V.А. Kalinin, А.А. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med Modern Spine Surgery The aim of the study was to assess clinical decision support system (CDSS) in spinal surgery for personalized minimally invasive technologies on lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study involved 59 patients operated on using CDSS based on a personalized surgical algorithm considering patient-specific parameters of lumbar segments. Among them, 11 patients underwent total disk replacement (TDR), 25 and 23 patients had minimally invasive (MI-TLIF) and open (O-TLIF) dorsal rigid stabilization, respectively, according to an original technology. The comparative analysis was carried out using retrospective findings of 196 patients operated on involving TDR (n=42), MI-TLIF (n=79), and O-TLIF (n=75). The efficiency of CDSS medical algorithms was assessed by pain syndrome in the lumbar spine and lower limbs, as well as by patients’ functional status on discharge according to ODI, 3 and 6 months after the operation. RESULTS: The comparison by gender characteristics and anthropometric data revealed no significant intergroup differences among the groups under study (p>0.05). Intergroup analysis of functional status by ODI, pain intensity in lower limbs and lumbar spine showed better clinical outcomes in patients operated using CDSS compared to a retrospective group (p<0.05): 6 months after TDR and O-TLIF, and 3 months after MI-TLIF. CONCLUSION: The study findings demonstrated high efficiency of CDSS developed for personalized surgical treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases taking into consideration individual biometric parameters of lumbar segments. Privolzhsky Research Medical University 2021 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8858415/ /pubmed/35265345 http://dx.doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.02 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Modern Spine Surgery
Byvaltsev, V.А.
Kalinin, А.А.
Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine
title Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine
title_full Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine
title_fullStr Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine
title_short Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine
title_sort assessment of clinical decision support system efficiency in spinal neurosurgery for personalized minimally invasive technologies used on lumbar spine
topic Modern Spine Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265345
http://dx.doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.02
work_keys_str_mv AT byvaltsevva assessmentofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemefficiencyinspinalneurosurgeryforpersonalizedminimallyinvasivetechnologiesusedonlumbarspine
AT kalininaa assessmentofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemefficiencyinspinalneurosurgeryforpersonalizedminimallyinvasivetechnologiesusedonlumbarspine