Cargando…

Differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma

BACKGROUND: Despite of a multimodal approach, recurrences can hardly be prevented in glioblastoma. This may be in part due to so called glioma stem cells. However, there is no established marker to identify these stem cells. METHODS: Paired samples from glioma patients were analyzed by immunohistoch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polat, Bülent, Wohlleben, Gisela, Kosmala, Rebekka, Lisowski, Dominik, Mantel, Frederick, Lewitzki, Victor, Löhr, Mario, Blum, Robert, Herud, Petra, Flentje, Michael, Monoranu, Camelia-Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35183162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02510-4
_version_ 1784654249209102336
author Polat, Bülent
Wohlleben, Gisela
Kosmala, Rebekka
Lisowski, Dominik
Mantel, Frederick
Lewitzki, Victor
Löhr, Mario
Blum, Robert
Herud, Petra
Flentje, Michael
Monoranu, Camelia-Maria
author_facet Polat, Bülent
Wohlleben, Gisela
Kosmala, Rebekka
Lisowski, Dominik
Mantel, Frederick
Lewitzki, Victor
Löhr, Mario
Blum, Robert
Herud, Petra
Flentje, Michael
Monoranu, Camelia-Maria
author_sort Polat, Bülent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite of a multimodal approach, recurrences can hardly be prevented in glioblastoma. This may be in part due to so called glioma stem cells. However, there is no established marker to identify these stem cells. METHODS: Paired samples from glioma patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of the following stem cell markers: CD133, Musashi, Nanog, Nestin, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4), and sex determining region Y-box 2 (Sox2). In addition, the expression of osteopontin (OPN) was investigated. The relative number of positively stained cells was determined. By means of Kaplan–Meier analysis, a possible association with overall survival by marker expression was investigated. RESULTS: Sixty tissue samples from 30 patients (17 male, 13 female) were available for analysis. For Nestin, Musashi and OPN a significant increase was seen. There was also an increase (not significant) for CD133 and Oct4. Patients with mutated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-1/2 (IDH-1/2) status had a reduced expression for CD133 and Nestin in their recurrent tumors. Significant correlations were seen for CD133 and Nanog between OPN in the primary and recurrent tumor and between CD133 and Nestin in recurrent tumors. By confocal imaging we could demonstrate a co-expression of CD133 and Nestin within recurrent glioma cells. Patients with high CD133 expression had a worse prognosis (22.6 vs 41.1 months, p = 0.013). A similar trend was seen for elevated Nestin levels (24.9 vs 41.1 months, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the evaluated markers showed an increased expression in their recurrent tumor. CD133 and Nestin were associated with survival and are candidate markers for further clinical investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02510-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8858483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88584832022-02-23 Differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma Polat, Bülent Wohlleben, Gisela Kosmala, Rebekka Lisowski, Dominik Mantel, Frederick Lewitzki, Victor Löhr, Mario Blum, Robert Herud, Petra Flentje, Michael Monoranu, Camelia-Maria Cancer Cell Int Primary Research BACKGROUND: Despite of a multimodal approach, recurrences can hardly be prevented in glioblastoma. This may be in part due to so called glioma stem cells. However, there is no established marker to identify these stem cells. METHODS: Paired samples from glioma patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of the following stem cell markers: CD133, Musashi, Nanog, Nestin, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4), and sex determining region Y-box 2 (Sox2). In addition, the expression of osteopontin (OPN) was investigated. The relative number of positively stained cells was determined. By means of Kaplan–Meier analysis, a possible association with overall survival by marker expression was investigated. RESULTS: Sixty tissue samples from 30 patients (17 male, 13 female) were available for analysis. For Nestin, Musashi and OPN a significant increase was seen. There was also an increase (not significant) for CD133 and Oct4. Patients with mutated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-1/2 (IDH-1/2) status had a reduced expression for CD133 and Nestin in their recurrent tumors. Significant correlations were seen for CD133 and Nanog between OPN in the primary and recurrent tumor and between CD133 and Nestin in recurrent tumors. By confocal imaging we could demonstrate a co-expression of CD133 and Nestin within recurrent glioma cells. Patients with high CD133 expression had a worse prognosis (22.6 vs 41.1 months, p = 0.013). A similar trend was seen for elevated Nestin levels (24.9 vs 41.1 months, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the evaluated markers showed an increased expression in their recurrent tumor. CD133 and Nestin were associated with survival and are candidate markers for further clinical investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02510-4. BioMed Central 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8858483/ /pubmed/35183162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02510-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Primary Research
Polat, Bülent
Wohlleben, Gisela
Kosmala, Rebekka
Lisowski, Dominik
Mantel, Frederick
Lewitzki, Victor
Löhr, Mario
Blum, Robert
Herud, Petra
Flentje, Michael
Monoranu, Camelia-Maria
Differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma
title Differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma
title_full Differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma
title_fullStr Differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma
title_short Differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma
title_sort differences in stem cell marker and osteopontin expression in primary and recurrent glioblastoma
topic Primary Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35183162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02510-4
work_keys_str_mv AT polatbulent differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT wohllebengisela differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT kosmalarebekka differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT lisowskidominik differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT mantelfrederick differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT lewitzkivictor differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT lohrmario differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT blumrobert differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT herudpetra differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT flentjemichael differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma
AT monoranucameliamaria differencesinstemcellmarkerandosteopontinexpressioninprimaryandrecurrentglioblastoma