Cargando…
Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests
Since autumn 2020, rapid antigen tests (RATs) have been implemented in several countries as an important pillar of the national testing strategy to rapidly screen for infections on site during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The current surge in infection rates around the globe is driven by the variant of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00430-022-00730-z |
_version_ | 1784654275600711680 |
---|---|
author | Osterman, Andreas Badell, Irina Basara, Elif Stern, Marcel Kriesel, Fabian Eletreby, Marwa Öztan, Gamze Naz Huber, Melanie Autenrieth, Hanna Knabe, Ricarda Späth, Patricia M. Muenchhoff, Maximilian Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Durner, Jürgen Czibere, Ludwig Dächert, Christopher Kaderali, Lars Baldauf, Hanna-Mari Keppler, Oliver T. |
author_facet | Osterman, Andreas Badell, Irina Basara, Elif Stern, Marcel Kriesel, Fabian Eletreby, Marwa Öztan, Gamze Naz Huber, Melanie Autenrieth, Hanna Knabe, Ricarda Späth, Patricia M. Muenchhoff, Maximilian Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Durner, Jürgen Czibere, Ludwig Dächert, Christopher Kaderali, Lars Baldauf, Hanna-Mari Keppler, Oliver T. |
author_sort | Osterman, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since autumn 2020, rapid antigen tests (RATs) have been implemented in several countries as an important pillar of the national testing strategy to rapidly screen for infections on site during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The current surge in infection rates around the globe is driven by the variant of concern (VoC) omicron (B.1.1.529). Here, we evaluated the performance of nine SARS-CoV-2 RATs in a single-centre laboratory study. We examined a total of 115 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative and 166 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive respiratory swab samples (101 omicron, 65 delta (B.1.617.2)) collected from October 2021 until January 2022 as well as cell culture-expanded clinical isolates of both VoCs. In an assessment of the analytical sensitivity in clinical specimen, the 50% limit of detection (LoD50) ranged from 1.77 × 10(6) to 7.03 × 10(7) RNA copies subjected to the RAT for omicron compared to 1.32 × 10(5) to 2.05 × 10(6) for delta. To score positive in these point-of-care tests, up to 10-fold (LoD50) or 101-fold (LoD95) higher virus loads were required for omicron- compared to delta-containing samples. The rates of true positive test results for omicron samples in the highest virus load category (Ct values < 25) ranged between 31.4 and 77.8%, while they dropped to 0–8.3% for samples with intermediate Ct values (25–30). Of note, testing of expanded virus stocks suggested a comparable RAT sensitivity of both VoCs, questioning the predictive value of this type of in vitro-studies for clinical performance. Given their importance for national test strategies in the current omicron wave, awareness must be increased for the reduced detection rate of omicron infections by RATs and a short list of suitable RATs that fulfill the minimal requirements of performance should be rapidly disclosed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00430-022-00730-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8858605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88586052022-02-22 Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests Osterman, Andreas Badell, Irina Basara, Elif Stern, Marcel Kriesel, Fabian Eletreby, Marwa Öztan, Gamze Naz Huber, Melanie Autenrieth, Hanna Knabe, Ricarda Späth, Patricia M. Muenchhoff, Maximilian Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Durner, Jürgen Czibere, Ludwig Dächert, Christopher Kaderali, Lars Baldauf, Hanna-Mari Keppler, Oliver T. Med Microbiol Immunol Original Article Since autumn 2020, rapid antigen tests (RATs) have been implemented in several countries as an important pillar of the national testing strategy to rapidly screen for infections on site during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The current surge in infection rates around the globe is driven by the variant of concern (VoC) omicron (B.1.1.529). Here, we evaluated the performance of nine SARS-CoV-2 RATs in a single-centre laboratory study. We examined a total of 115 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative and 166 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive respiratory swab samples (101 omicron, 65 delta (B.1.617.2)) collected from October 2021 until January 2022 as well as cell culture-expanded clinical isolates of both VoCs. In an assessment of the analytical sensitivity in clinical specimen, the 50% limit of detection (LoD50) ranged from 1.77 × 10(6) to 7.03 × 10(7) RNA copies subjected to the RAT for omicron compared to 1.32 × 10(5) to 2.05 × 10(6) for delta. To score positive in these point-of-care tests, up to 10-fold (LoD50) or 101-fold (LoD95) higher virus loads were required for omicron- compared to delta-containing samples. The rates of true positive test results for omicron samples in the highest virus load category (Ct values < 25) ranged between 31.4 and 77.8%, while they dropped to 0–8.3% for samples with intermediate Ct values (25–30). Of note, testing of expanded virus stocks suggested a comparable RAT sensitivity of both VoCs, questioning the predictive value of this type of in vitro-studies for clinical performance. Given their importance for national test strategies in the current omicron wave, awareness must be increased for the reduced detection rate of omicron infections by RATs and a short list of suitable RATs that fulfill the minimal requirements of performance should be rapidly disclosed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00430-022-00730-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8858605/ /pubmed/35187580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00430-022-00730-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Osterman, Andreas Badell, Irina Basara, Elif Stern, Marcel Kriesel, Fabian Eletreby, Marwa Öztan, Gamze Naz Huber, Melanie Autenrieth, Hanna Knabe, Ricarda Späth, Patricia M. Muenchhoff, Maximilian Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Durner, Jürgen Czibere, Ludwig Dächert, Christopher Kaderali, Lars Baldauf, Hanna-Mari Keppler, Oliver T. Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests |
title | Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests |
title_full | Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests |
title_fullStr | Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests |
title_short | Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests |
title_sort | impaired detection of omicron by sars-cov-2 rapid antigen tests |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00430-022-00730-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ostermanandreas impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT badellirina impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT basaraelif impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT sternmarcel impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT krieselfabian impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT eletrebymarwa impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT oztangamzenaz impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT hubermelanie impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT autenriethhanna impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT knabericarda impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT spathpatriciam impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT muenchhoffmaximilian impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT grafalexander impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT krebsstefan impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT blumhelmut impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT durnerjurgen impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT czibereludwig impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT dachertchristopher impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT kaderalilars impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT baldaufhannamari impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests AT kepplerolivert impaireddetectionofomicronbysarscov2rapidantigentests |