Cargando…
FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was undertaken of the lateral flow-based FebriDx immunoassay for triaging patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon admission to healthcare facilities. An electronic search was conducted in Scopus and Medline using the keywords...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35202747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.009 |
_version_ | 1784654307087351808 |
---|---|
author | Lippi, G. Nocini, R. Mattiuzzi, C. Henry, B.M. |
author_facet | Lippi, G. Nocini, R. Mattiuzzi, C. Henry, B.M. |
author_sort | Lippi, G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was undertaken of the lateral flow-based FebriDx immunoassay for triaging patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon admission to healthcare facilities. An electronic search was conducted in Scopus and Medline using the keywords ‘FebriDx’ AND ‘COVID-19’ OR ‘SARS-CoV-2’, with no language or date (i.e. up to 4(th) February 2022) limits, selecting studies where FebriDx was used for triaging patients with suspected COVID-19 in acute care settings, and reporting sufficient data to construct a 2×2 table. Five studies were included in the final analysis, totalling 2309 patients. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88–0.93] and 0.92 (95% CI 0.90–0.93), whilst the area under the curve, accuracy and kappa statistics were 0.971 (95% CI 0.962–0.980), 91.4% (95% CI 90.2–92.5%) and 0.762 (95% CI 0.731–0.793), respectively, thus reflecting substantial agreement with reference molecular testing techniques. Negative and positive predictive values were 0.974 (95% CI 0.966–0.981) and 0.742 (95% CI 0.711–0.770), respectively. This pooled analysis demonstrated that FebriDx has clinical value for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 in acute care settings, especially in regions with high viral circulation in which the pre-test probability is high, and enables prioritization for confirmatory laboratory testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8858770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88587702022-02-22 FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis Lippi, G. Nocini, R. Mattiuzzi, C. Henry, B.M. J Hosp Infect Systematic Review A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was undertaken of the lateral flow-based FebriDx immunoassay for triaging patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon admission to healthcare facilities. An electronic search was conducted in Scopus and Medline using the keywords ‘FebriDx’ AND ‘COVID-19’ OR ‘SARS-CoV-2’, with no language or date (i.e. up to 4(th) February 2022) limits, selecting studies where FebriDx was used for triaging patients with suspected COVID-19 in acute care settings, and reporting sufficient data to construct a 2×2 table. Five studies were included in the final analysis, totalling 2309 patients. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88–0.93] and 0.92 (95% CI 0.90–0.93), whilst the area under the curve, accuracy and kappa statistics were 0.971 (95% CI 0.962–0.980), 91.4% (95% CI 90.2–92.5%) and 0.762 (95% CI 0.731–0.793), respectively, thus reflecting substantial agreement with reference molecular testing techniques. Negative and positive predictive values were 0.974 (95% CI 0.966–0.981) and 0.742 (95% CI 0.711–0.770), respectively. This pooled analysis demonstrated that FebriDx has clinical value for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 in acute care settings, especially in regions with high viral circulation in which the pre-test probability is high, and enables prioritization for confirmatory laboratory testing. The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-05 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8858770/ /pubmed/35202747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.009 Text en © 2022 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Lippi, G. Nocini, R. Mattiuzzi, C. Henry, B.M. FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title | FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_full | FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_short | FebriDx for rapid screening of patients with suspected COVID-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | febridx for rapid screening of patients with suspected covid-19 upon hospital admission: systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35202747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lippig febridxforrapidscreeningofpatientswithsuspectedcovid19uponhospitaladmissionsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT nocinir febridxforrapidscreeningofpatientswithsuspectedcovid19uponhospitaladmissionsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT mattiuzzic febridxforrapidscreeningofpatientswithsuspectedcovid19uponhospitaladmissionsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT henrybm febridxforrapidscreeningofpatientswithsuspectedcovid19uponhospitaladmissionsystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis |