Cargando…

Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation

AIM: To evaluate an intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use and prevent catheter‐associated urinary‐tract infections (CAUTI) in hospitalized patients across an academic health science centre. METHODS: We conducted a one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Backman, Chantal, Wooller, Krista R., Hasimja‐Saraqini, Delvina, Demery Varin, Melissa, Crick, Michelle, Cho‐Young, Danielle, Freeman, Lisa, Delaney, Lori, Squires, Janet E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33988900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.920
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To evaluate an intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use and prevent catheter‐associated urinary‐tract infections (CAUTI) in hospitalized patients across an academic health science centre. METHODS: We conducted a one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation. Phase 1 consisted of a pre/postintervention to test the impact of a CAUTI protocol. Audits on four units were conducted, and data were analysed descriptively. Phase 2 consisted of a theory‐based process evaluation to understand the barriers/enablers to the implementation. Semistructured interviews were conducted and then analysed using a systematic approach. RESULTS: In Phase 1, all inpatients with urinary catheters admitted to the units (N = 4) during the study period (N = 99, pre) and (N = 99, post) were included. CAUTI prevalence rate was 18.2% pre versus 14.1% post (p = .563). In Phase 2, participants (N = 18) who worked on the units were interviewed, and a total of 13 barriers and 19 enablers were found.