Cargando…

Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation

AIM: To evaluate an intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use and prevent catheter‐associated urinary‐tract infections (CAUTI) in hospitalized patients across an academic health science centre. METHODS: We conducted a one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Backman, Chantal, Wooller, Krista R., Hasimja‐Saraqini, Delvina, Demery Varin, Melissa, Crick, Michelle, Cho‐Young, Danielle, Freeman, Lisa, Delaney, Lori, Squires, Janet E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33988900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.920
_version_ 1784654369273151488
author Backman, Chantal
Wooller, Krista R.
Hasimja‐Saraqini, Delvina
Demery Varin, Melissa
Crick, Michelle
Cho‐Young, Danielle
Freeman, Lisa
Delaney, Lori
Squires, Janet E.
author_facet Backman, Chantal
Wooller, Krista R.
Hasimja‐Saraqini, Delvina
Demery Varin, Melissa
Crick, Michelle
Cho‐Young, Danielle
Freeman, Lisa
Delaney, Lori
Squires, Janet E.
author_sort Backman, Chantal
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate an intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use and prevent catheter‐associated urinary‐tract infections (CAUTI) in hospitalized patients across an academic health science centre. METHODS: We conducted a one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation. Phase 1 consisted of a pre/postintervention to test the impact of a CAUTI protocol. Audits on four units were conducted, and data were analysed descriptively. Phase 2 consisted of a theory‐based process evaluation to understand the barriers/enablers to the implementation. Semistructured interviews were conducted and then analysed using a systematic approach. RESULTS: In Phase 1, all inpatients with urinary catheters admitted to the units (N = 4) during the study period (N = 99, pre) and (N = 99, post) were included. CAUTI prevalence rate was 18.2% pre versus 14.1% post (p = .563). In Phase 2, participants (N = 18) who worked on the units were interviewed, and a total of 13 barriers and 19 enablers were found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8859062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88590622022-03-31 Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation Backman, Chantal Wooller, Krista R. Hasimja‐Saraqini, Delvina Demery Varin, Melissa Crick, Michelle Cho‐Young, Danielle Freeman, Lisa Delaney, Lori Squires, Janet E. Nurs Open Research Articles AIM: To evaluate an intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use and prevent catheter‐associated urinary‐tract infections (CAUTI) in hospitalized patients across an academic health science centre. METHODS: We conducted a one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation. Phase 1 consisted of a pre/postintervention to test the impact of a CAUTI protocol. Audits on four units were conducted, and data were analysed descriptively. Phase 2 consisted of a theory‐based process evaluation to understand the barriers/enablers to the implementation. Semistructured interviews were conducted and then analysed using a systematic approach. RESULTS: In Phase 1, all inpatients with urinary catheters admitted to the units (N = 4) during the study period (N = 99, pre) and (N = 99, post) were included. CAUTI prevalence rate was 18.2% pre versus 14.1% post (p = .563). In Phase 2, participants (N = 18) who worked on the units were interviewed, and a total of 13 barriers and 19 enablers were found. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8859062/ /pubmed/33988900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.920 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Backman, Chantal
Wooller, Krista R.
Hasimja‐Saraqini, Delvina
Demery Varin, Melissa
Crick, Michelle
Cho‐Young, Danielle
Freeman, Lisa
Delaney, Lori
Squires, Janet E.
Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation
title Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation
title_full Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation
title_fullStr Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation
title_short Intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: A one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation
title_sort intervention to reduce unnecessary urinary catheter use in a large academic health science centre: a one‐group, pretest, posttest study with a theory‐based process evaluation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33988900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.920
work_keys_str_mv AT backmanchantal interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation
AT woollerkristar interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation
AT hasimjasaraqinidelvina interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation
AT demeryvarinmelissa interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation
AT crickmichelle interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation
AT choyoungdanielle interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation
AT freemanlisa interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation
AT delaneylori interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation
AT squiresjanete interventiontoreduceunnecessaryurinarycatheteruseinalargeacademichealthsciencecentreaonegrouppretestpostteststudywithatheorybasedprocessevaluation