Cargando…

A98 FECAL LEUKOCYTE ESTERASE: AN ALTERNATIVE BIOMARKER TO FECAL CALPROTECTIN IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non-invasive biomarker used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management and risk stratification of non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms. Leukocyte esterase is an inexpensive and widely available point-of-care inflammatory marker present on urinalysis tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klemm, N K, Trasolini, R, Zhu, K, Wong, S, Salh, B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859202/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwab049.097
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non-invasive biomarker used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management and risk stratification of non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms. Leukocyte esterase is an inexpensive and widely available point-of-care inflammatory marker present on urinalysis test strips. AIMS: We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of fecal leukocyte esterase (FLE) relative to FC and endoscopy and demonstrate its use as an alternative biomarker for IBD. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 70 patients who had FC ordered as part of standard clinical care also received FLE testing. FLE levels were compared to various FC cut-off values, endoscopy and pathology findings as gold standard. RESULTS: As the FC cut-off increased from 50 to 500 μg/g, FLE sensitivity increased from 67% to 95% while the specificity decreased from 86% to 76%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) increased from 0.79 to 0.90. An FLE of ≥1+ had the best test characteristics. Amongst patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation, FLE demonstrated an identical sensitivity (75%) and specificity (86%) to FC in predicting endoscopic inflammation. AUROC was 0.80 for FLE and 0.85 for FC with an optimal cut-off of ≥2+ and 301 μg/g, respectively. When used to distinguish between active IBD and no/inactive IBD patients, FLE had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 90%, comparable to the 84% and 83%, respectively, of FC. AUROC was 0.88 for FLE and 0.91 for FC with an optimal cut-off of ≥2+ and 145 μg/g, respectively CONCLUSIONS: FLE demonstrates adequate correlation and comparable accuracy to FC in predicting endoscopic inflammation and distinguishing between patients with active versus inactive IBD. [Image: see text] FUNDING AGENCIES: None