Cargando…

A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is curable by standard surgery with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). However, there are well known associated long-term bowel and sexual dysfunctions. Non-operative management (NOM) is an emerging treatment for patients with operable rectal cancer. There is evidence support...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vuong, T, Garant, A, Khosrow-Khavar, F, Devic, S, Enger, S, Boutros, M, Cohen, A, Miller, C S, Friedman, G, Galiatsatos, P, Nguyen, V, Benoit, N, Lan Thai, H, Diec, H, Desgroseilliers, C, Faria, J, Vasilevsky, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859336/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwab049.140
_version_ 1784654435642769408
author Vuong, T
Garant, A
Khosrow-Khavar, F
Devic, S
Enger, S
Boutros, M
Cohen, A
Miller, C S
Friedman, G
Galiatsatos, P
Nguyen, V
Benoit, N
Lan Thai, H
Diec, H
Desgroseilliers, C
Faria, J
Vasilevsky, C
author_facet Vuong, T
Garant, A
Khosrow-Khavar, F
Devic, S
Enger, S
Boutros, M
Cohen, A
Miller, C S
Friedman, G
Galiatsatos, P
Nguyen, V
Benoit, N
Lan Thai, H
Diec, H
Desgroseilliers, C
Faria, J
Vasilevsky, C
author_sort Vuong, T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is curable by standard surgery with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). However, there are well known associated long-term bowel and sexual dysfunctions. Non-operative management (NOM) is an emerging treatment for patients with operable rectal cancer. There is evidence supporting dose response for tumor control in rectal adenocarcinoma. AIMS: In the era of modern technologies, Image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy is a means to deliver local radiotherapy boost treatments. We explored its role in a randomized phase II/III trial (NCT03051464) for patients aiming to achieve cure without surgery. Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) free survival at 2 years was the primary endpoint. We now present the interim analysis upon accrual of the first 40 patients. METHODS: In randomized trial, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent 5-FU/ Capecitabine. They were randomized to receive either an EBRT boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm A), or three weekly adaptive brachytherapy boosts for a total of 30 Gy in 3 fractions (Arm B). RESULTS: Forty patients were included (20 per arm). The median age was 66 years; baseline characteristics were well balanced in terms of age, tumor location, T stage and tumor size (Table 1). The acute treatment related toxicities are similar as shown in table 2 but in arm B, there were two deaths: one patient died during his chemotherapy and external beam treatment from congestive heart failure and one patient from a heart attack after treatment prior to salvage TME surgery. The proportion of complete clinical response was 50% (n=10/20) in Arm A and 90% in Arm B (n=18/20). With a median follow-up of 2.2 years, local regrowth at 2 years occurred in 4/10 patients (40%) in Arm A and 4/18 patients (22%) in Arm B. TME-free survival rate at 2 years was 45.9% in Arm A and 85.1% in Arm B (p=0.0036) (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: The interim analysis of this trial suggests that these two strategies of radiation dose escalation are feasible and lead to high chances of organ preservation in patients with operable rectal cancer. The Independent Monitoring Comittee (IDMC) approved the continuation of patient recruitment in the phase III study as planned. [Image: see text] FUNDING AGENCIES: Elekta
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8859336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88593362022-02-22 A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER? Vuong, T Garant, A Khosrow-Khavar, F Devic, S Enger, S Boutros, M Cohen, A Miller, C S Friedman, G Galiatsatos, P Nguyen, V Benoit, N Lan Thai, H Diec, H Desgroseilliers, C Faria, J Vasilevsky, C J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Poster of Distinction BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is curable by standard surgery with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). However, there are well known associated long-term bowel and sexual dysfunctions. Non-operative management (NOM) is an emerging treatment for patients with operable rectal cancer. There is evidence supporting dose response for tumor control in rectal adenocarcinoma. AIMS: In the era of modern technologies, Image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy is a means to deliver local radiotherapy boost treatments. We explored its role in a randomized phase II/III trial (NCT03051464) for patients aiming to achieve cure without surgery. Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) free survival at 2 years was the primary endpoint. We now present the interim analysis upon accrual of the first 40 patients. METHODS: In randomized trial, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent 5-FU/ Capecitabine. They were randomized to receive either an EBRT boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm A), or three weekly adaptive brachytherapy boosts for a total of 30 Gy in 3 fractions (Arm B). RESULTS: Forty patients were included (20 per arm). The median age was 66 years; baseline characteristics were well balanced in terms of age, tumor location, T stage and tumor size (Table 1). The acute treatment related toxicities are similar as shown in table 2 but in arm B, there were two deaths: one patient died during his chemotherapy and external beam treatment from congestive heart failure and one patient from a heart attack after treatment prior to salvage TME surgery. The proportion of complete clinical response was 50% (n=10/20) in Arm A and 90% in Arm B (n=18/20). With a median follow-up of 2.2 years, local regrowth at 2 years occurred in 4/10 patients (40%) in Arm A and 4/18 patients (22%) in Arm B. TME-free survival rate at 2 years was 45.9% in Arm A and 85.1% in Arm B (p=0.0036) (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: The interim analysis of this trial suggests that these two strategies of radiation dose escalation are feasible and lead to high chances of organ preservation in patients with operable rectal cancer. The Independent Monitoring Comittee (IDMC) approved the continuation of patient recruitment in the phase III study as planned. [Image: see text] FUNDING AGENCIES: Elekta Oxford University Press 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8859336/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwab049.140 Text en ڣ The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster of Distinction
Vuong, T
Garant, A
Khosrow-Khavar, F
Devic, S
Enger, S
Boutros, M
Cohen, A
Miller, C S
Friedman, G
Galiatsatos, P
Nguyen, V
Benoit, N
Lan Thai, H
Diec, H
Desgroseilliers, C
Faria, J
Vasilevsky, C
A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?
title A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?
title_full A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?
title_fullStr A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?
title_full_unstemmed A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?
title_short A141 IS SURGERY STILL THE ONLY TREATMENT OPTION FOR CURABLE RECTAL CANCER?
title_sort a141 is surgery still the only treatment option for curable rectal cancer?
topic Poster of Distinction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859336/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwab049.140
work_keys_str_mv AT vuongt a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT garanta a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT khosrowkhavarf a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT devics a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT engers a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT boutrosm a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT cohena a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT millercs a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT friedmang a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT galiatsatosp a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT nguyenv a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT benoitn a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT lanthaih a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT diech a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT desgroseilliersc a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT fariaj a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer
AT vasilevskyc a141issurgerystilltheonlytreatmentoptionforcurablerectalcancer