Cargando…

Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this literature review was to identify preoperative risk factors associated with recurrent instability after Bankart repair. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for potentially eligible articles. Two reviewers independently...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Mingtao, Liu, Jiaxin, Jia, Yaofei, Zhang, Guangrui, Zhou, Jianping, Wu, Ding, Jiang, Jin, Yun, Xiangdong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03011-w
_version_ 1784654554991689728
author Zhang, Mingtao
Liu, Jiaxin
Jia, Yaofei
Zhang, Guangrui
Zhou, Jianping
Wu, Ding
Jiang, Jin
Yun, Xiangdong
author_facet Zhang, Mingtao
Liu, Jiaxin
Jia, Yaofei
Zhang, Guangrui
Zhou, Jianping
Wu, Ding
Jiang, Jin
Yun, Xiangdong
author_sort Zhang, Mingtao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this literature review was to identify preoperative risk factors associated with recurrent instability after Bankart repair. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for potentially eligible articles. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts using prespecified criteria. Articles were included if they clearly stated the risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair. Data on patient characteristics and recurrence rate were collected from each study. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis and the statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. RESULTS: Nineteen studies that included 2922 participants met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of recurrent instability was 15.3% (range 6.9–42). The mean follow-up duration was 40.5 months (18–108). Twenty-one risk factors were identified, 10 of which were explored quantitatively. Statistically significant risk factors for recurrent instability following a Bankart procedure were age under 20 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8–96.23, p < 0.00001), a Hill-Sachs lesion (OR 3.61, 95% CI 2.06–6.33, p < 0.00001), a glenoid bone lesion (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.96–4.01, p < 0.00001), shoulder hyperlaxity (OR 4.55, 95% CI 2.19–9.44, p < 0.0001), and an off-track lesion (OR 5.53, 95% CI 2.21–13.86, p = 0.0003). There was moderate evidence indicating that male sex (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.07–2.37, p = 0.02) and playing contact sports (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.96–2.45, p = 0.07) were further risk factors. Dominant side, a superior labrum from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesion, and more than five preoperative dislocations were not found to be risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients younger than 20 years of age, a Hill–Sachs lesion, a glenoid bone lesion, shoulder hyperlaxity, and an off-track lesion appear to be significant predictors of recurrent instability following a Bankart procedure. Factors such as male sex and playing contact sports were associated with recurrent instability. Dominant side, a SLAP lesion, and more than five preoperative dislocations were not significant risk factors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03011-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8859902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88599022022-02-23 Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Mingtao Liu, Jiaxin Jia, Yaofei Zhang, Guangrui Zhou, Jianping Wu, Ding Jiang, Jin Yun, Xiangdong J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The aim of this literature review was to identify preoperative risk factors associated with recurrent instability after Bankart repair. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for potentially eligible articles. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts using prespecified criteria. Articles were included if they clearly stated the risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair. Data on patient characteristics and recurrence rate were collected from each study. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis and the statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. RESULTS: Nineteen studies that included 2922 participants met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of recurrent instability was 15.3% (range 6.9–42). The mean follow-up duration was 40.5 months (18–108). Twenty-one risk factors were identified, 10 of which were explored quantitatively. Statistically significant risk factors for recurrent instability following a Bankart procedure were age under 20 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8–96.23, p < 0.00001), a Hill-Sachs lesion (OR 3.61, 95% CI 2.06–6.33, p < 0.00001), a glenoid bone lesion (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.96–4.01, p < 0.00001), shoulder hyperlaxity (OR 4.55, 95% CI 2.19–9.44, p < 0.0001), and an off-track lesion (OR 5.53, 95% CI 2.21–13.86, p = 0.0003). There was moderate evidence indicating that male sex (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.07–2.37, p = 0.02) and playing contact sports (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.96–2.45, p = 0.07) were further risk factors. Dominant side, a superior labrum from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesion, and more than five preoperative dislocations were not found to be risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients younger than 20 years of age, a Hill–Sachs lesion, a glenoid bone lesion, shoulder hyperlaxity, and an off-track lesion appear to be significant predictors of recurrent instability following a Bankart procedure. Factors such as male sex and playing contact sports were associated with recurrent instability. Dominant side, a SLAP lesion, and more than five preoperative dislocations were not significant risk factors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03011-w. BioMed Central 2022-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8859902/ /pubmed/35184753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03011-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Zhang, Mingtao
Liu, Jiaxin
Jia, Yaofei
Zhang, Guangrui
Zhou, Jianping
Wu, Ding
Jiang, Jin
Yun, Xiangdong
Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort risk factors for recurrence after bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03011-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangmingtao riskfactorsforrecurrenceafterbankartrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujiaxin riskfactorsforrecurrenceafterbankartrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiayaofei riskfactorsforrecurrenceafterbankartrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangguangrui riskfactorsforrecurrenceafterbankartrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhoujianping riskfactorsforrecurrenceafterbankartrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuding riskfactorsforrecurrenceafterbankartrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangjin riskfactorsforrecurrenceafterbankartrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yunxiangdong riskfactorsforrecurrenceafterbankartrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis