Cargando…
Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry
Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for poultry in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on diseas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228848 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7127 |
_version_ | 1784654557660315648 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Alvarez, Julio |
author_facet | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Alvarez, Julio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for poultry in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR E. faecalis can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 4 (Categories A, B and D; 0–5%, 5–10% and 1–10% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 3 and 5 (Categories C and E, 33–66% and 33–66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for AMR E. faecalis according to Article 8 criteria are mostly birds of the orders Galliformes and Anseriformes, but also mammals and reptiles can serve as reservoirs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8859914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88599142022-02-27 Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Alvarez, Julio EFSA J Scientific Opinion Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for poultry in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR E. faecalis can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 4 (Categories A, B and D; 0–5%, 5–10% and 1–10% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 3 and 5 (Categories C and E, 33–66% and 33–66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for AMR E. faecalis according to Article 8 criteria are mostly birds of the orders Galliformes and Anseriformes, but also mammals and reptiles can serve as reservoirs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8859914/ /pubmed/35228848 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7127 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Kohnle, Lisa Alvarez, Julio Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry |
title | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry |
title_full | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry |
title_fullStr | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry |
title_short | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry |
title_sort | assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the animal health law (regulation (eu) no 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant enterococcus faecalis in poultry |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35228848 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT bicoutdominiquejoseph assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT calistripaolo assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT canalielisabetta assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT drewejulianashley assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT garinbastujibruno assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT gortazarchristian assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT herskinmette assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT michelvirginie assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT mirandachuecamiguelangel assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT padalinobarbara assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT pasqualipaolo assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT robertshelenclare assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT spoolderhans assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT stahlkarl assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT velardeantonio assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT viltroparvo assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT wincklerchristoph assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT baldinellifrancesca assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT brogliaalessandro assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT kohnlelisa assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry AT alvarezjulio assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantenterococcusfaecalisinpoultry |