Cargando…

How is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in primary healthcare in Norway: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To examine the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary healthcare in Norway. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey study examin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frisk, Bente, Sundør, Ingrid Elise, Dønåsen, Mette Ramstad, Refvem, Olav Kåre, Borge, Christine Råheim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053503
_version_ 1784654579958284288
author Frisk, Bente
Sundør, Ingrid Elise
Dønåsen, Mette Ramstad
Refvem, Olav Kåre
Borge, Christine Råheim
author_facet Frisk, Bente
Sundør, Ingrid Elise
Dønåsen, Mette Ramstad
Refvem, Olav Kåre
Borge, Christine Råheim
author_sort Frisk, Bente
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary healthcare in Norway. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey study examining the content, organisational settings and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary PR for people with COPD. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: When the survey was conducted, Norway had 436 municipalities/primary healthcare services who were invited to participate. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the question related to accessibility to a PR programme in primary healthcare. We also examined in what degree the single interventions which are a part of a PR programme were one of the municipalities services and if there were regional differences regarding PR. RESULTS: Of the 436 municipalities, 158 answered the survey (36% response rate), and the survey covered for 45% of the total population in Norway. Five per cent of the responders reported having multidisciplinary PR for patients with COPD. The most frequently reported single interventions that can be a part of a multidisciplinary PR programme were reported as follows: group exercise training for all diagnoses (27%), reablement (25%) and home-care treatment by a physiotherapist and/or occupational therapist (24%). Southern-Eastern Norway had a significantly lower number of these interventions than Western Norway, Central Norway, and Northern Norway (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Only 5% of the Norwegian primary healthcare services (municipalities) had a multidisciplinary PR programme for patients with COPD. PR is the most important and cost-effective treatment within integrated care of patients with COPD. National strategies are therefore needed to increase the availability of PR for patients with COPD in Norwegian municipalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8860025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88600252022-03-08 How is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in primary healthcare in Norway: a cross-sectional study Frisk, Bente Sundør, Ingrid Elise Dønåsen, Mette Ramstad Refvem, Olav Kåre Borge, Christine Råheim BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary healthcare in Norway. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey study examining the content, organisational settings and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary PR for people with COPD. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: When the survey was conducted, Norway had 436 municipalities/primary healthcare services who were invited to participate. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the question related to accessibility to a PR programme in primary healthcare. We also examined in what degree the single interventions which are a part of a PR programme were one of the municipalities services and if there were regional differences regarding PR. RESULTS: Of the 436 municipalities, 158 answered the survey (36% response rate), and the survey covered for 45% of the total population in Norway. Five per cent of the responders reported having multidisciplinary PR for patients with COPD. The most frequently reported single interventions that can be a part of a multidisciplinary PR programme were reported as follows: group exercise training for all diagnoses (27%), reablement (25%) and home-care treatment by a physiotherapist and/or occupational therapist (24%). Southern-Eastern Norway had a significantly lower number of these interventions than Western Norway, Central Norway, and Northern Norway (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Only 5% of the Norwegian primary healthcare services (municipalities) had a multidisciplinary PR programme for patients with COPD. PR is the most important and cost-effective treatment within integrated care of patients with COPD. National strategies are therefore needed to increase the availability of PR for patients with COPD in Norwegian municipalities. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8860025/ /pubmed/35177448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053503 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Frisk, Bente
Sundør, Ingrid Elise
Dønåsen, Mette Ramstad
Refvem, Olav Kåre
Borge, Christine Råheim
How is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in primary healthcare in Norway: a cross-sectional study
title How is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in primary healthcare in Norway: a cross-sectional study
title_full How is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in primary healthcare in Norway: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr How is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in primary healthcare in Norway: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed How is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in primary healthcare in Norway: a cross-sectional study
title_short How is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD in primary healthcare in Norway: a cross-sectional study
title_sort how is the organisational settings, content and availability of comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation for people with copd in primary healthcare in norway: a cross-sectional study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053503
work_keys_str_mv AT friskbente howistheorganisationalsettingscontentandavailabilityofcomprehensivemultidisciplinarypulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithcopdinprimaryhealthcareinnorwayacrosssectionalstudy
AT sundøringridelise howistheorganisationalsettingscontentandavailabilityofcomprehensivemultidisciplinarypulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithcopdinprimaryhealthcareinnorwayacrosssectionalstudy
AT dønasenmetteramstad howistheorganisationalsettingscontentandavailabilityofcomprehensivemultidisciplinarypulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithcopdinprimaryhealthcareinnorwayacrosssectionalstudy
AT refvemolavkare howistheorganisationalsettingscontentandavailabilityofcomprehensivemultidisciplinarypulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithcopdinprimaryhealthcareinnorwayacrosssectionalstudy
AT borgechristineraheim howistheorganisationalsettingscontentandavailabilityofcomprehensivemultidisciplinarypulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithcopdinprimaryhealthcareinnorwayacrosssectionalstudy