Cargando…

PrEP distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Novel mechanisms of service delivery are needed to expand access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. Providing PrEP directly through pharmacies could offer an additional option for reaching potential users. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies examini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Caitlin E, Yeh, Ping Teresa, Atkins, Kaitlyn, Ferguson, Laura, Baggaley, Rachel, Narasimhan, Manjulaa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35190430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054121
_version_ 1784654585412976640
author Kennedy, Caitlin E
Yeh, Ping Teresa
Atkins, Kaitlyn
Ferguson, Laura
Baggaley, Rachel
Narasimhan, Manjulaa
author_facet Kennedy, Caitlin E
Yeh, Ping Teresa
Atkins, Kaitlyn
Ferguson, Laura
Baggaley, Rachel
Narasimhan, Manjulaa
author_sort Kennedy, Caitlin E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Novel mechanisms of service delivery are needed to expand access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. Providing PrEP directly through pharmacies could offer an additional option for reaching potential users. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies examining effectiveness, values and preferences of end users and health workers, and cost of PrEP initiation and continuation through pharmacies (pharmacy access). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE through 2 December 2020. We also searched clinical trial registries and recent HIV conference abstracts. Standardised methods were used to search, screen and extract data from included studies. RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria for the effectiveness review, for either PrEP initiation or continuation. However, six ‘case studies’ presenting non-comparative data from PrEP pharmacy programmes demonstrated feasibility of this model in the USA. Eleven studies reported values and preferences of end users and health workers. In the USA, Kenya and South Africa, potential PrEP clients generally supported pharmacy access, although some preferred clinics. One study of PrEP pharmacy clients found all would ‘definitely recommend’ the programme. Six studies found pharmacists were generally supportive of offering PrEP; one study including doctors found more limited favour, while one study of diverse Kenyan stakeholders found broad support. Three studies reported cost data indicating client willingness to pay in the USA and Kenya and initial sustainability of a clinic financial model in the USA. CONCLUSION: Provision of PrEP through pharmacies has been demonstrated to be feasible in the USA and acceptable to potential end users and stakeholders in multiple settings. Limited evidence on effectiveness and requirements for laboratory testing and assurance of high-quality services may limit enthusiasm for this approach. Further research is needed to determine if pharmacy access is a safe and effective way to help achieve global HIV prevention goals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021231650.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8860049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88600492022-03-08 PrEP distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review Kennedy, Caitlin E Yeh, Ping Teresa Atkins, Kaitlyn Ferguson, Laura Baggaley, Rachel Narasimhan, Manjulaa BMJ Open HIV/AIDS INTRODUCTION: Novel mechanisms of service delivery are needed to expand access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. Providing PrEP directly through pharmacies could offer an additional option for reaching potential users. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies examining effectiveness, values and preferences of end users and health workers, and cost of PrEP initiation and continuation through pharmacies (pharmacy access). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE through 2 December 2020. We also searched clinical trial registries and recent HIV conference abstracts. Standardised methods were used to search, screen and extract data from included studies. RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria for the effectiveness review, for either PrEP initiation or continuation. However, six ‘case studies’ presenting non-comparative data from PrEP pharmacy programmes demonstrated feasibility of this model in the USA. Eleven studies reported values and preferences of end users and health workers. In the USA, Kenya and South Africa, potential PrEP clients generally supported pharmacy access, although some preferred clinics. One study of PrEP pharmacy clients found all would ‘definitely recommend’ the programme. Six studies found pharmacists were generally supportive of offering PrEP; one study including doctors found more limited favour, while one study of diverse Kenyan stakeholders found broad support. Three studies reported cost data indicating client willingness to pay in the USA and Kenya and initial sustainability of a clinic financial model in the USA. CONCLUSION: Provision of PrEP through pharmacies has been demonstrated to be feasible in the USA and acceptable to potential end users and stakeholders in multiple settings. Limited evidence on effectiveness and requirements for laboratory testing and assurance of high-quality services may limit enthusiasm for this approach. Further research is needed to determine if pharmacy access is a safe and effective way to help achieve global HIV prevention goals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021231650. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8860049/ /pubmed/35190430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054121 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS
Kennedy, Caitlin E
Yeh, Ping Teresa
Atkins, Kaitlyn
Ferguson, Laura
Baggaley, Rachel
Narasimhan, Manjulaa
PrEP distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review
title PrEP distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review
title_full PrEP distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review
title_fullStr PrEP distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed PrEP distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review
title_short PrEP distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review
title_sort prep distribution in pharmacies: a systematic review
topic HIV/AIDS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35190430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054121
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedycaitline prepdistributioninpharmaciesasystematicreview
AT yehpingteresa prepdistributioninpharmaciesasystematicreview
AT atkinskaitlyn prepdistributioninpharmaciesasystematicreview
AT fergusonlaura prepdistributioninpharmaciesasystematicreview
AT baggaleyrachel prepdistributioninpharmaciesasystematicreview
AT narasimhanmanjulaa prepdistributioninpharmaciesasystematicreview