Cargando…

Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes

PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to answer whether early closure of defunctioning ileostomy may be suitable after low anterior resection. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, up...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podda, Mauro, Coccolini, Federico, Gerardi, Chiara, Castellini, Greta, Wilson, Michael Samuel James, Sartelli, Massimo, Pacella, Daniela, Catena, Fausto, Peltrini, Roberto, Bracale, Umberto, Pisanu, Adolfo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35190885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04106-w
_version_ 1784654606865793024
author Podda, Mauro
Coccolini, Federico
Gerardi, Chiara
Castellini, Greta
Wilson, Michael Samuel James
Sartelli, Massimo
Pacella, Daniela
Catena, Fausto
Peltrini, Roberto
Bracale, Umberto
Pisanu, Adolfo
author_facet Podda, Mauro
Coccolini, Federico
Gerardi, Chiara
Castellini, Greta
Wilson, Michael Samuel James
Sartelli, Massimo
Pacella, Daniela
Catena, Fausto
Peltrini, Roberto
Bracale, Umberto
Pisanu, Adolfo
author_sort Podda, Mauro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to answer whether early closure of defunctioning ileostomy may be suitable after low anterior resection. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, up to October 2021, for RCTs comparing early closure (EC ≤ 30 days) and delayed closure (DC ≥ 60 days) of defunctioning ileostomy. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI was calculated for dichotomous variables and the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. The GRADE methodology was implemented for assessing Quality of Evidence (QoE). TSA was implemented to address the risk of random error associated with sparse data and/or multiple testing. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were included for quantitative synthesis. 599 patients were allocated to either EC (n = 306) or DC (n = 293). EC was associated with a higher rate of wound complications compared to DC (RR 2.56; 95% CI 1.33 to 4.93; P = 0.005; I(2) = 0%, QoE High), a lower incidence of postoperative small bowel obstruction (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.89; P = 0.02; I(2) = 0%, QoE moderate), and a lower rate of stoma-related complications (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 0%, QoE moderate). The rate of minor low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.55 to 2.33; P = 0.74; I(2) = 0%, QoE low) and major LARS (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.09; P = 0.16; I(2) = 0%, QoE low) did not differ between the two groups. TSA demonstrated inconclusive evidence with insufficient sample sizes to detect the observed effects. CONCLUSION: EC may confer some advantages compared with a DC. However, TSA advocated a cautious interpretation of the results. PROSPERO REGISTER ID: CRD42021276557 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-022-04106-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8860143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88601432022-02-22 Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes Podda, Mauro Coccolini, Federico Gerardi, Chiara Castellini, Greta Wilson, Michael Samuel James Sartelli, Massimo Pacella, Daniela Catena, Fausto Peltrini, Roberto Bracale, Umberto Pisanu, Adolfo Int J Colorectal Dis Review PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to answer whether early closure of defunctioning ileostomy may be suitable after low anterior resection. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, up to October 2021, for RCTs comparing early closure (EC ≤ 30 days) and delayed closure (DC ≥ 60 days) of defunctioning ileostomy. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI was calculated for dichotomous variables and the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. The GRADE methodology was implemented for assessing Quality of Evidence (QoE). TSA was implemented to address the risk of random error associated with sparse data and/or multiple testing. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were included for quantitative synthesis. 599 patients were allocated to either EC (n = 306) or DC (n = 293). EC was associated with a higher rate of wound complications compared to DC (RR 2.56; 95% CI 1.33 to 4.93; P = 0.005; I(2) = 0%, QoE High), a lower incidence of postoperative small bowel obstruction (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.89; P = 0.02; I(2) = 0%, QoE moderate), and a lower rate of stoma-related complications (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 0%, QoE moderate). The rate of minor low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.55 to 2.33; P = 0.74; I(2) = 0%, QoE low) and major LARS (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.09; P = 0.16; I(2) = 0%, QoE low) did not differ between the two groups. TSA demonstrated inconclusive evidence with insufficient sample sizes to detect the observed effects. CONCLUSION: EC may confer some advantages compared with a DC. However, TSA advocated a cautious interpretation of the results. PROSPERO REGISTER ID: CRD42021276557 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-022-04106-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8860143/ /pubmed/35190885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04106-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Podda, Mauro
Coccolini, Federico
Gerardi, Chiara
Castellini, Greta
Wilson, Michael Samuel James
Sartelli, Massimo
Pacella, Daniela
Catena, Fausto
Peltrini, Roberto
Bracale, Umberto
Pisanu, Adolfo
Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes
title Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes
title_full Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes
title_fullStr Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes
title_short Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes
title_sort early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35190885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04106-w
work_keys_str_mv AT poddamauro earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT coccolinifederico earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT gerardichiara earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT castellinigreta earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT wilsonmichaelsamueljames earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT sartellimassimo earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT pacelladaniela earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT catenafausto earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT peltriniroberto earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT bracaleumberto earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes
AT pisanuadolfo earlyversusdelayeddefunctioningileostomyclosureafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofsafetyandfunctionaloutcomes