Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashedi, Sina, Tavolinejad, Hamed, Kazemian, Sina, Mardani, Mahta, Masoudi, Maryam, Masoudkabir, Farzad, Haghjoo, Majid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23778
_version_ 1784654683859582976
author Rashedi, Sina
Tavolinejad, Hamed
Kazemian, Sina
Mardani, Mahta
Masoudi, Maryam
Masoudkabir, Farzad
Haghjoo, Majid
author_facet Rashedi, Sina
Tavolinejad, Hamed
Kazemian, Sina
Mardani, Mahta
Masoudi, Maryam
Masoudkabir, Farzad
Haghjoo, Majid
author_sort Rashedi, Sina
collection PubMed
description Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and efficacy of SDD after AF catheter ablation. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library until August 21, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed with the “Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies” (MINORS). The pooled efficacy rate of SDD protocol (defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day of ablation among the patients who were planned for SDD) was calculated. Meanwhile, pooled major complication rates and early readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates were evaluated in successful and planned SDD groups separately. Overall, 12 observational studies consisting of 18,065 catheter ablations were included, among which 7320 (40.52%) were discharged the same‐day after ablation. The pooled efficacy was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] [82.7–96.0]). The major complication rates were 1.1% (95%CI [0.5–1.9]), and 0.7% (95% CI [0.0–3.1]) in planned SDD and successful SDD groups, respectively. In addition, readmission/ED visit rate were 3.0% (95%CI [0.9–6.1]), and 3.1% (95% CI [0.8–6.5]) in the same groups. There were no significant differences between planned SDD and overnight groups with respect to major complication rate (risk ratio = 0.70, 95%CI [0.35–1.42], p‐value = .369). The available data indicates that SDD after AF ablation is safe and efficient. Further prospective and randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the safety of SDD after AF ablation and develop a standardized SDD protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8860483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88604832022-02-27 Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Rashedi, Sina Tavolinejad, Hamed Kazemian, Sina Mardani, Mahta Masoudi, Maryam Masoudkabir, Farzad Haghjoo, Majid Clin Cardiol Reviews Conventionally, patients have been admitted overnight after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several centers have recently adopted a same‐day discharge (SDD) protocol for patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for the safety and efficacy of SDD after AF catheter ablation. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library until August 21, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed with the “Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies” (MINORS). The pooled efficacy rate of SDD protocol (defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day of ablation among the patients who were planned for SDD) was calculated. Meanwhile, pooled major complication rates and early readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates were evaluated in successful and planned SDD groups separately. Overall, 12 observational studies consisting of 18,065 catheter ablations were included, among which 7320 (40.52%) were discharged the same‐day after ablation. The pooled efficacy was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] [82.7–96.0]). The major complication rates were 1.1% (95%CI [0.5–1.9]), and 0.7% (95% CI [0.0–3.1]) in planned SDD and successful SDD groups, respectively. In addition, readmission/ED visit rate were 3.0% (95%CI [0.9–6.1]), and 3.1% (95% CI [0.8–6.5]) in the same groups. There were no significant differences between planned SDD and overnight groups with respect to major complication rate (risk ratio = 0.70, 95%CI [0.35–1.42], p‐value = .369). The available data indicates that SDD after AF ablation is safe and efficient. Further prospective and randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the safety of SDD after AF ablation and develop a standardized SDD protocol. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8860483/ /pubmed/35084049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23778 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Rashedi, Sina
Tavolinejad, Hamed
Kazemian, Sina
Mardani, Mahta
Masoudi, Maryam
Masoudkabir, Farzad
Haghjoo, Majid
Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of same‐day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8860483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23778
work_keys_str_mv AT rashedisina efficacyandsafetyofsamedaydischargeafteratrialfibrillationablationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tavolinejadhamed efficacyandsafetyofsamedaydischargeafteratrialfibrillationablationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kazemiansina efficacyandsafetyofsamedaydischargeafteratrialfibrillationablationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mardanimahta efficacyandsafetyofsamedaydischargeafteratrialfibrillationablationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT masoudimaryam efficacyandsafetyofsamedaydischargeafteratrialfibrillationablationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT masoudkabirfarzad efficacyandsafetyofsamedaydischargeafteratrialfibrillationablationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haghjoomajid efficacyandsafetyofsamedaydischargeafteratrialfibrillationablationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis